Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cell Sci ; 136(13)2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37387255

ABSTRACT

Cell division involves separating the genetic material and cytoplasm of a mother cell into two daughter cells. The last step of cell division, abscission, consists of cutting the cytoplasmic bridge, a microtubule-rich membranous tube connecting the two cells, which contains the midbody, a dense proteinaceous structure. Canonically, abscission occurs 1-3 h after anaphase. However, in certain cases, abscission can be severely delayed or incomplete. Abscission delays can be caused by mitotic defects that activate the abscission 'NoCut' checkpoint in tumor cells, as well as when cells exert abnormally strong pulling forces on the bridge. Delayed abscission can also occur during normal organism development. Here, we compare the mechanisms triggering delayed and incomplete abscission in healthy and disease scenarios. We propose that NoCut is not a bona fide cell cycle checkpoint, but a general mechanism that can control the dynamics of abscission in multiple contexts.


Subject(s)
Microtubules , Stem Cells , Animals , Cytoplasm , Cytosol , Anaphase
2.
STAR Protoc ; 4(1): 102000, 2023 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853702

ABSTRACT

Immunofluorescent labeling is a widely used method to visualize endogenous proteins. It can be expensive and difficult to stain mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) because they require expensive growth media, prefer specific substrates, grow in 3D, and have loose cell-substrate adhesion. Here we propose a half-a-day, cheap, easy-to-follow, and reproducible protocol for immunofluorescence of mESCs. This protocol has been streamlined to allow a fast visualization of the investigated proteins, and we provide tips specific to stem cell culture. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Chaigne et al. (2021).1.


Subject(s)
Cell Culture Techniques , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , Animals , Mice , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Cell Differentiation , Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique
3.
Nature ; 607(7919): 604-609, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831506

ABSTRACT

Chromosome segregation errors during cell divisions generate aneuploidies and micronuclei, which can undergo extensive chromosomal rearrangements such as chromothripsis1-5. Selective pressures then shape distinct aneuploidy and rearrangement patterns-for example, in cancer6,7-but it is unknown whether initial biases in segregation errors and micronucleation exist for particular chromosomes. Using single-cell DNA sequencing8 after an error-prone mitosis in untransformed, diploid cell lines and organoids, we show that chromosomes have different segregation error frequencies that result in non-random aneuploidy landscapes. Isolation and sequencing of single micronuclei from these cells showed that mis-segregating chromosomes frequently also preferentially become entrapped in micronuclei. A similar bias was found in naturally occurring micronuclei of two cancer cell lines. We find that segregation error frequencies of individual chromosomes correlate with their location in the interphase nucleus, and show that this is highest for peripheral chromosomes behind spindle poles. Randomization of chromosome positions, Cas9-mediated live tracking and forced repositioning of individual chromosomes showed that a greater distance from the nuclear centre directly increases the propensity to mis-segregate. Accordingly, chromothripsis in cancer genomes9 and aneuploidies in early development10 occur more frequently for larger chromosomes, which are preferentially located near the nuclear periphery. Our findings reveal a direct link between nuclear chromosome positions, segregation error frequencies and micronucleus content, with implications for our understanding of tumour genome evolution and the origins of specific aneuploidies during development.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Chromosome Positioning , Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9 , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Chromosomes/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Chromothripsis , Growth and Development/genetics , Humans , Interphase , Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective , Mitosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Organoids/cytology , Organoids/metabolism , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Single-Cell Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...