Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 39(6): 1343-50, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21336116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether prehospital statin use is associated with a lower risk of sepsis, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality in critically ill patients. We also investigated the effect of combined prehospital use of both statins and aspirin. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort. PATIENTS: A total of 575 critically ill patients admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit of an academic tertiary-care hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 575 patients, 149 (26%) were on statin therapy before hospitalization. A multivariable analysis including age, gender, current tobacco use, prehospital aspirin use, race, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score revealed that patients on statin therapy before hospitalization were less likely to have or develop severe sepsis (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.96) or acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.99) during the first four intensive care unit days. In-hospital mortalities for patients with and without prehospital statin use (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.83) were similar. Patients who had prehospital use of both statins and aspirin had the lowest rates of severe sepsis, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital use of statins may be protective against sepsis and acute lung injury. This effect may be potentiated by prehospital aspirin use.


Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury/epidemiology , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 92(13): 2263-9, 2010 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20807919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether immobilization of an arm has detrimental effects on driving performance. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy officers-in-training were assigned a sequence of fiberglass splints (left and right-sided above-the-elbow thumb spica and below-the-elbow splints) with use of a randomized higher-order crossover design. Runs were scored on a cone-marked driving course used for officer certification with predetermined passing requirements. Driving time, the number of cones hit per course section, and the cone-adjusted total time (a five-second penalty per hit cone) were recorded. A linear mixed-effect model with random environmental and learning effects for cone-adjusted time analysis was used. Participants rated perceived driving difficulty and safety with each splint, and ratings were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed the entire set of runs. Analysis of total cone-adjusted time revealed a significant performance decrease with the left arm in an above-the-elbow thumb spica splint (average, 22.2 seconds; p < 0.001) and with the left arm in a below-the-elbow splint (average, 16.2; p = 0.007). Analysis of forward-only course sections revealed poorer performance trends with all splints, with the worst performance with the left arm in an above-the-elbow thumb spica splint. Driving with the left arm in an above-the-elbow thumb spica splint had the highest perceived difficulty (median, 8.0) and lowest perceived safety (median, 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Driving performance as measured with a standardized track and scoring system was significantly degraded with splint immobilization of the left arm. Further studies are required to determine the effect of arm immobilization on normal driving conditions.


Subject(s)
Arm , Automobile Driving , Immobilization , Splints , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Linear Models , Statistics, Nonparametric , Task Performance and Analysis
3.
Surgery ; 148(2): 354-63, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20580047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer mortality. The role of dopamine and cAMP regulated phosphoprotein MW 32 kDa (DARPP-32) overexpression in the gastric tumorigenesis cascade remains unclear. METHODS: The expression of DARPP-32 in the multistep carcinogenesis cascade was examined using immunohistochemistry analysis on 533 samples. The contribution of DARPP-32 in cellular transformation and molecular signaling was investigated using NIH3T3, AGS, and SNU16 cells. RESULTS: The composite expression score (CES), calculated from immunostaining patterns, increased significantly from normal or gastritis to metaplasia, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma (P < .001). In patients with normal stomach or gastritis and tumor samples, a 76% and 77% chance, respectively, was found (P < .001) that CES was higher in the tumor. High median CES correlated with well- or moderately differentiated (P = .03) gastric adenocarcinomas. NIH3T3 cells transfected with DARPP-32 demonstrated increased levels of phospho-AKT and a 5-fold increase in the number of foci as compared with the control (P = .02). DARPP-32 expression in AGS cells led to increased protein levels of phospho-AKT and BCL-2. For validation, the knockdown of endogenous DARPP-32 expression in SNU16 cells using shRNA resulted in decreased levels of phospho-AKT phosphorylation and BCL-2. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DARPP-32 overexpression may participate in the transition to intestinal metaplasia and in the progression to neoplasia. The ability of DARPP-32 to transform NIH3T3 cells and to regulate AKT and BCL-2 underscores its possible oncogenic potential.


Subject(s)
Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32/antagonists & inhibitors , Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32/genetics , Gastritis/genetics , Gastritis/metabolism , Gastritis/pathology , Gene Expression , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Metaplasia , Mice , NIH 3T3 Cells , Phosphorylation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Signal Transduction , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Tissue Array Analysis
4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 208(5): 829-38; discussion 838-41, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19476845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in pancreatic cancer remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine if CRT improved survival in patients with resected pancreatic cancer in a large, multiinstitutional cohort of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from seven academic medical institutions were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with T4 or M1 disease, R2 resection margin, preoperative therapy, chemotherapy alone, or if adjuvant therapy status was unknown. RESULTS: There were 747 patients included in the initial evaluation. Primary analysis was performed between patients that had surgery alone (n=374) and those receiving adjuvant CRT (n=299). Median followup time was 12.2 months and 14.5 months for survivors. Median overall survival for patients receiving adjuvant CRT was significantly longer than for those undergoing operation alone (20.0 months versus 14.5 months, p=0.001). On subset and multivariate analysis, adjuvant CRT demonstrated a significant survival advantage only among patients who had lymph node (LN)-positive disease (hazard ratio 0.477, 95% CI 0.357 to 0.638) and not for LN-negative patients (hazard ratio 0.810, 95% CI 0.556 to 1.181). Disease-free survival in patients with LN-negative disease who received adjuvant CRT was significantly worse than in patients who had surgery alone (14.5 months versus 18.6 months, p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: This large multiinstitutional study emphasizes the importance of analyzing subsets of patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma who have LN metastasis. Benefit of adjuvant CRT is seen only in patients with LN-positive disease, regardless of resection margin status. CRT in patients with LN-negative disease may contribute to reduced disease-free survival.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL