Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades.

Background: Medical school clerkship grades are used to evaluate orthopedic surgery residency applicants, however, high interinstitutional variability in grade distribution calls into question the utility of clerkship grades when evaluating applicants from different medical schools. This study aims to evaluate the variability in grade distribution among medical schools and look for trends in grade distribution over recent years. Methods: Applications submitted to Rush University's orthopedic surgery residency program from 2015, 2019, and 2022 were collected from the Electronic Residency Application Service. Applications from the top 100 schools according to the 2023-2024 U.S. News and World Report Research Rankings were reviewed. The percentage of "honors" grades awarded by medical schools for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships were extracted from applicants' Medical Student Performance Evaluation letters. Results: The median percentage of honors given in 2022 was 36.0 % (range 10.0-82.0) for the surgery clerkship and 33.0 % (range 6.7-80.0) for the internal medicine clerkship. Honors were given 6.6 % more in the surgery clerkship in 2022 compared to 2015. There was a negative correlation between a higher (worse) U.S. News and World Report research ranking and the percentage of honors awarded in 2022 for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships. Conclusion: There is substantial interinstitutional variability in the rate that medical schools award an "honors" grade with evidence of grade inflation in the surgery clerkship. Residency programs using clerkship grades to compare applicants should do so cautiously provided the variability demonstrated in this study.

Opening Wedge Osteotomy for the Treatment of Pediatric Radial Neck Malunion and Anterior Radiocapitellar Dislocation: A Case Report.

Radial neck fractures are common injuries of the elbow in the pediatric patient. Surgical intervention is recommended for significant angulation and displacement or mechanical blocks to motion. Radial neck malunion is a rare complication and may result in altered joint mechanics and, if severe, joint incongruency. Dislocation of the radial head has yet to be reported in this population after radial neck malunion. Treatment for radial neck malunions with dislocation varies and can include radial head excision or radial neck osteotomy. Outcomes after radial neck osteotomy is limited to case reports and small cases series. We present a case report of pediatric patient with radial neck malunion and anterior radiocapitellar dislocation treated with joint realignment via opening wedge osteotomy. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pediatric case with radial head dislocation secondary to neck malunion and the first described report using this technique.

Pediatric Forearm Muscle Herniation Treated With an Acellular Dermal Allograft.

Muscle herniations occur through acquired fascial defects in the lower extremities; upper-extremity herniations are rare. The affected patients are typically adult men engaging in strenuous exercise or with injury; pediatric cases are infrequent. We a pediatric patient with a symptomatic, forearm herniation treated with fascial defect closure using an acellular dermal allograft. This case report highlights not only the presence of this rare condition in pediatrics but also a safe and viable treatment option for this patient population. The patient presented with pain and soft-tissue swelling of the forearm, was diagnosed with muscular herniation, and was surgically treated with fascial defect closure using an acellular dermal allograft. All symptoms resolved, without the recurrence of herniation and with return to sport. Upper-extremity muscle herniations are rare but should be considered in pediatric patients following trauma/surgery and can be treated successfully with acellular dermal allografts.

Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: Perspective of Applicants and Program Directors on Medical Student Virtual Experiences.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic Residency Directors advised against visiting subinternship rotations in the peak of the pandemic. To adapt, programs offered multiple virtual experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate programs and applicants perceptions regarding the value of virtual experiences during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle and their utility in future application cycles. METHODS: A survey was disseminated to 31 residency programs gathering data about virtual experiences offered in this cycle. A second survey was disseminated to interns who have successfully matched at those programs to identify how interns think to have benefited from the experiences. RESULTS: Twenty-eight programs completed the survey (90% response rate). One hundred eight new interns completed the survey (70% response rate). Virtual information sessions and resident socials were the highest attended (94% and 92%, respectively). Interns and leadership agreed that virtual rotations provided students with a good understanding of program culture and what the programs offer educationally. Neither the leadership nor the interns would recommend replacing in-person aways with virtual experiences. CONCLUSION: Virtual experiences helped bridge the gap after away rotations were canceled. Alongside in-person aways, virtual experiences are likely to play a role in future cycles. However, virtual experiences remain incomparable to in-person away rotations and are not recommended as a replacement.

Supplemental Essays for Residency Applications: The Modern Day Typewriter.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate one institution's use of a supplemental essay and its effect on the total number and demographics of applicants as compared to previous years. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review of candidates applying to our institution's Orthopedic Surgery residency program in the 2020 to 2021 cycle was performed. All applicants were presented a prompt for a short supplemental essay. Only candidates who completed the essay were considered for an invitation to interview. Differences in proportions of female and under-represented minority (URM) applicants associated with the year of application and with essay completion were evaluated. A similar analysis was also performed to assess differences in demographics of interviewees between years. SETTING: A single academic medical center providing tertiary care. PARTICIPANTS: All orthopedic residency applicants from the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 cycles. RESULTS: Of 863 applicants in 2021, 506 (59%) completed the supplemental essay. URM status was significantly associated with application year and essay completion. However, demographics of eligible applicants and interviewees were not significantly associated with the application year, nor were the proportion of female or URM candidates offered an interview. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis based on use of the supplemental essay in one application cycle demonstrated that it was effective in reducing the application review burden by approximately 41.4% without adversely affecting the demographics of the interviewee pool.

The Transition to Practice from Residency and Fellowship: The Need to Better Prepare Residents and Fellows for What Lies Ahead.

¼: There is currently no standard method or time requirement devoted to the teaching of practice management in orthopaedic residency, but there is widespread agreement that it is a necessary part of orthopaedic education. ¼: Overall, there are 3 major components to an effective transition-to-practice model: mock independent practice, appropriate feedback and oversight, and consistent exposure. ¼: An overarching theme is the importance of debriefing by senior faculty, coupled with mock practice scenarios.

Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish clinically significant outcome values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the pediatric and adolescent populations and to assess factors that were associated with achieving these outcomes. METHODS: Patients between the age of 10 to 21 who underwent ACLR between 2016 and 2018 were identified and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative variables collected included graft choice, graft size (diameter), graft fixation method, and concomitant procedures. PROs collected for analysis were the International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MCID and PASS were calculated using receiver operating characteristic with area under the curve analyses for delta (ie, baseline-to-postoperative change) and absolute postoperative PRO scores, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis. Of the entire study population, 53 (89.8%) reported satisfaction with their surgical outcome. The established MCID threshold values based on the study population were 33.3 for IKDC, 28.6 for (KOOS) Symptoms, 19.4 for Pain, 2.9 for activities of daily living (ADL), 45.0 for Sport, and 25.0 for Quality of Life (QoL). Postoperative scores greater than the following values corresponded to the PASS: 80.5 for IKDC, 75.0 (KOOS) Symptoms, 88.9 for Pain, 98.5 for ADL, 75.0 for Sport, and 68.8 for QoL. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful outcomes including MCID and PASS were established for pediatric ACLR surgery using selected PRO measures, IKDC, and KOOS. Patient age, sex, graft type, and graft size were not associated with greater achievement of these outcomes. In contrast, collision sports, fixed-object high-impact rotational landing sports, and concomitant meniscectomy surgery were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving clinically significant improvement. However, findings must be interpreted with caution due to limitations in follow-up and sample size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: case series.

Postinterview Communication in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Interviews: A Survey of Match Applicants.

Background: To maintain the integrity of the match, postinterview communication (PIC) from programs to applicants is monitored and discouraged. The most recent report on the prevalence of PIC in orthopaedics found that 64% of surveyed applicants in 2014 and 2015 had received some form of PIC during their match cycle. In July 2019, the American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (AOA/CORD) released a guideline recommending the elimination of all PIC in any form. The goal of this follow-up study was to determine the current prevalence of PIC with orthopaedic surgery applicants and assess the perspectives of medical students who recently applied for orthopaedic surgery residency positions. Methods: A 35-question survey was e-mailed to all orthopaedic surgery residency applicants of 4 geographically diverse residency programs in postmatch March 2020. The survey was open for 1 month, and the responses were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 229 respondents (21% response rate), 91 (39.7%) received PIC during the 2019 to 2020 residency match cycle. The program director was most commonly identified (80.2%) as the person who communicated with the applicants. At the interview day, 198 respondents (86.5%) were told that programs would not be contacting the applicants with PIC. However, over a quarter of respondents (25.3%) who received PIC answered that those programs contacted applicants after announcing they would not. Nearly half of the respondents (48.5%) agreed or strongly agreed that PIC causes added stress on applicants, and over half (52.9%) agreed or strongly agreed that all programs should stop participating in any form of PIC. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of PIC seems to have decreased since the 2014 and 2015 match, there is still room for improvement toward eliminating PIC. The AOA/CORD position statement from July 2019 should be disseminated to all members of the residency selection team to ensure consistency from all programs. The primary limitation of this study was the 21% response rate. Level of Evidence: Level IV (survey study).

Promoting Wellness in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency.

The challenges associated with surgical residency have been well documented and described. Despite implementation of work-hour restrictions, residency remains a balancing act between patient care, surgical and clinical education, medical record documentation, and research endeavors. The added challenge of balancing these duties with life outside of the hospital further complicates the situation. Multiple studies have documented the stress associated with residency training, highlighting the prevalence of emotional exhaustion, detachment from people both in and out of the hospital, and a concerning rate of clinical depression among residents. Moreover, this emotional exhaustion has been shown to directly correlate with residents' clinical performance and abilities to carry out academic duties. More recently, feelings of isolation and detachment have been exacerbated by the necessity of COVID-19 precautions and change in clinical duties. The Accreditation for Graduate Medical Education (ACGM) now requires all residencies to include programming that focuses on resident well-being. Programs have implemented various strategies in an effort to help their trainees cope with the stress associated with residency and beyond. Despite the variety in approaches of programs, these initiatives have the similar objective of teaching resilience and the ability to navigate stressors in a healthy and effective manner. The programming can also serve to promote resident interaction and develop camaraderie in an effort to minimize feelings of emotional exhaustion and isolation. In this article, we discuss the importance of sustained physician wellness and describe approaches from various professions that can be implemented into the wellness curriculum for residency programs across the country. By promoting a culture of wellness and incorporating effective wellness programming, our aim is that residents will be able to succeed not only in their training but also in their personal lives and professional endeavors after graduation.

ISSLS PRIZE in Clinical Science 2022: Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical impact of juvenile Modic changes in paediatric patients with low back pain.

PURPOSE: It's a long-held belief that Modic changes (MC) occur only in adults, with advanced age, and are highly associated with pain and adverse outcomes. The following study addressed the epidemiology, risk factors and clinical relevance of MC in young paediatric patients. METHODS: Two hundred and seven consecutive patients with no history of deformities, neoplasms, trauma, or infections were included in this ambispective study. MRIs were utilized to assess MCs and types, and other degenerative disc/endplate abnormalities. Subject demographics, duration of symptoms, clinic visits, conservative management (physical therapy, NSAIDs, opioids, injections) and surgery were noted. RESULTS: The mean age was 16.5 years old (46.9% males), 14% had MCs and they occurred throughout the spine. Subject baseline demographics were similar between MCs and non-MCs patients (p > 0.05). Modic type 2 (50%) was the most common type (type 1:27.1%; type 3:18.8%; mixed:4.7%). Multivariate analyses noted that endplate damage (OR: 11.36), disc degeneration (OR: 5.81), disc space narrowing (OR: 5.77), Schmorl's nodes (OR: 4.30) and spondylolisthesis (OR: 3.55) to be significantly associated with MCs (p < 0.05). No significant differences in conservative management were noted between Modic and non-MCs patients (p > 0.05). Among surgery patients (n = 44), 21% also had MCs (p = 0.134). Symptom-duration was significantly greater in MC patients (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Contrary to traditional dogma, robust evidence now exists noting that MCs and their types can develop in children. Our findings give credence to the "Juvenile" variant of MCs, whereby its implications throughout the lifespan need to be assessed. Juvenile MCs have prolonged symptoms and related to specific structural spine phenotypes.

The US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scoring Change: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants From the 2019 to 2020 Match Cycle.

INTRODUCTION: The USMLE Step 1 examination has been used as an objective measure for comparing residency applicants. Recently, the National Board of Medical Examiners and the Federation of State Medical Boards decided that the USMLE Step 1 examination will transition to a pass/fail result starting no earlier than 2022. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perspective of medical students who applied for orthopaedic surgery residency positions during the 2019 to 2020 interview cycle on the USMLE scoring change, and the potential effect this change may result in for future applicants and the residency selection process. METHODS: A 15-item anonymous web-based survey was sent to 1,090 orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from four regionally diverse residency programs. The survey elicited attitudes toward the transition of the Step 1 examination to pass/fail and perspectives this change may or may not have on the residency selection process. RESULTS: Responses were received from 356 applicants (32.7%). The majority (61.6%) disagreed with the change to pass/fail scoring, and 68.5% do not believe that the change will decrease stress levels in medical students. For interview invitations, respondents chose Step 2 clinical knowledge, letters of recommendation, and performance on away rotations as the most influential factors in the absence of a Step 1 score. CONCLUSION: Most of the students surveyed who applied for an orthopaedic surgery residency position during the most recent application cycle disagreed with the National Board of Medical Examiner/Federation of State Medical Board decision to change Step 1 to pass/fail and feel that this change may have disadvantage in certain student groups while either increasing or having no effect on medical student stress. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of back pain in the pediatric population is increasing, and the workup of these patients presents a clinical challenge. Many cases are selflimited, but failure to diagnose a pathology that requires clinical intervention can carry severe repercussions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carries a high cost to the patient and health care system, and may even require procedural sedation in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system based on pediatric patient factors to help determine when an MRI will change clinical management. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive pediatric patients who presented to clinic with a chief complaint of back pain between 2010 and 2018 at single orthopaedic surgery practice. Comprehensive demographic and presentation variables were collected. A predictive model of factors that influence whether MRI results in a change in management was then generated using cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 729 patients were included, with a mean age of 15.1 years (range: 3 to 20 y). Of these, 344 (47.2%) had an MRI. A predictive model was generated, with nocturnal symptoms (5 points), neurological deficit (10 points), age (0.7 points per year), lumbar pain (2 points), sudden onset of pain (3.25 points), and leg pain (3.75 points) identified as significant predictors. A combined score of greater than 9.5 points for a given patient is highly suggestive that an MRI will result in a change in clinical management (specificity: 0.93; positive predictive value: 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model was generated to help determine when ordering an MRI may result in a change in clinical management for workup of back pain in the pediatric population. The main factors included the presence of a neurological deficit, nocturnal symptoms, sudden onset, leg pain, lumbar pain, and age. Care providers can use these findings to better determine if and when an MRI might be appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.

Comparison of waterproof versus cotton cast liners on cast index in pediatric forearm fractures.

Achieving an adequate cast mold is critical for successful nonoperative management of pediatric forearm fractures. A high cast index (>0.8) is as- sociated with an increased risk of loss of reduction and failure of conservative management. Waterproof cast liners offer improved patient satisfaction compared to conventional cotton liners, however they may carry different mechanical properties compared to traditional cotton liners. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the cast index differs between waterproof and traditional cotton cast liners when used to stabilize pediatric forearm fractures. We retrospectively reviewed all forearm fractures casted in a pediatric orthopedic surgeon's clinic between December 2009 and January 2017. Either a waterproof or cotton cast liner was utilized according to parent and patient preferences. The cast index was determined on follow-up radiographs and compared between groups. Overall, 127 fractures met the criteria for this study. Twenty-five fractures had waterproof liners and 102 fractures had cotton liners placed. Waterproof liner casts showed a significantly higher cast index (0.832 vs 0.777; p=0.001), with a significantly higher proportion of casts with index greater than 0.8 (64.0% vs 35.3%; p=0.009). The use of waterproof cast liners is associated with a higher cast index compared to traditional cotton cast liners. Although waterproof liners may be associated with higher patient satisfaction scores, providers should be aware of this difference in mechanical properties and may consider altering their casting technique accordingly.

Perceptions of the Universal Interview Offer Day in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Interview Process.

INTRODUCTION: The American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors recommended implementing a universal offer day (UOD) in the 2020 residency match. Although this decision was an attempt to benefit applicants, it is important to assess how this endeavor was perceived. METHODS: Questionnaires for applicants and program directors asked about the perception of the UOD and the experience with it. Responses were included from 383 applicants (43% response rate) and 84 program directors (45% response rate). RESULTS: Applicant Survey: Most of the students (81.5%) were worried or very worried about the interview offer process. Most of the applicants (64.0%) stated that the UOD decreased their stress. The majority (93.2%) indicated that they would like to see the UOD continue in future years. Program Director Survey: Most of the program directors (83.1%) mentioned that they would like to see the UOD continued, and 86.8% indicated that they would participate in a similar process if implemented in future cycles. DISCUSSION: Benefits of a standardized interview offer date include decreased stress and fewer clinical interruptions. Advantages can also extend to scheduling conflicts and over-interviewing. These favorable results, along with positive experiences from other specialties implementing a UOD, encourage the continued use of this approach for offering interviews. DATA AVAILABILITY: N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: N/A.

Do Medical Students Who Participate in a Research Gap Year Produce More Research During Residency?

BACKGROUND: The research gap year has become increasingly popular among medical students. It is also a well-known factor in consideration for orthopaedic surgery residency programs. Although medical students who participated in a research gap year typically enter residency with more research experience than their counterparts, it is unknown whether this translates to increased research productivity during residency compared with their peers. The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) whether residents who participated in a research gap year during medical school publish more peer-reviewed publications than their peers during residency, (2) whether residents who participated in a research gap year during medical school publish more first-author publications than their peers during residency, and (3) which applicant characteristics are associated with a greater number of peer-reviewed publications produced during residency. METHODS: The number of peer-reviewed journal publications before and during residency was determined by querying PubMed for 81 orthopaedic surgery residents at two academic institutions. Electronic residency application service applications and curriculum vitae were reviewed to evaluate the number of conference podiums and conference posters presented before residency and during residency. The research productivity of residents who participated in a research gap year during medical school was compared with that of residents who had not participated in a research gap year. Multivariate regression was done to determine predictors of publishing peer-reviewed journal publications during residency. RESULTS: Residents who participated in a research gap year during medical school produced more peer-reviewed journal publications during residency than those who did not (22.0 ± 20 versus 16.5 ± 20, P = 0.025). However, residents who participated in a research gap year did not produce more first-author publications compared with their peers (7.6 ± 10.0 versus 7.9 ± 7.0, P = 0.12). Residents who produced more publications before residency produced more publications while in residency (R = 0.363, P < 0.001). The United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 score, medical school ranking, and sex were not associated with any difference in the number of journal publications produced during residency. CONCLUSION: A dedicated research year during medical school is associated with an increase in the number of peer-reviewed publications produced during residency. However, students who completed a research year did not publish more first-author publications than their peers. The number of publications before residency was a strong predictor of research output as a resident.

The Use of Personality Assessment in Mentoring and to Aid in Self-reflection in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

Personality plays an important role in performance in medical education and mentorship. Personality assessment can aid in the ability to identify strengths and areas for development by understanding how one's personality influences their learning and interpersonal relationships. We sought to evaluate personality assessment as an effective tool in mentoring during orthopaedic residency in this prospective, cross-sectional study from two orthopaedic surgery residency programs using the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI). Participants completed a survey regarding their experience with the assessment. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and two-sample t-tests were used to examine differences between groups. In total, thirty-four individuals completed the survey. Our results showed 82.4% reported that the HPI very accurately represented them and 58.8% reported better understanding potentially perceived strengths and weaknesses. In total, 75.7% and 72.7% were satisfied with their mentorship about development as a clinician and researcher, respectively. Significant differences were seen between participants who did and did not re-review their results, and participants who did and did-not believe their results profile was accurate. We conclude that personality assessments can be valuable in promoting introspection and strengthening relationships within orthopaedic surgery, particularly when they are valued and emphasized by the user. Our results suggest that use of the HPI provided participants with a better understanding of their perceived strengths and weaknesses as they progress through their orthopaedic residency training.

Resident Wellness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey of Orthopaedic Residents.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the resident workforce to a particularly powerful and unexpected extent. Given the drastic changes to resident roles, expectations, and responsibilities, many valuable lessons regarding resident concerns and wellness can be garnered from this unique experience. METHODS: A voluntary survey was sent to 179 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program directors to distribute to their residents. Questions focused on issues that may have occurred, program's responses, and expectations of programs during the pandemic. RESULTS: In total, 507 residents completed the survey, and 10% reported being deployed to do nonorthopaedic-related care, with junior classes being more likely to receive this assignment (P < 0.001). The greatest concern for respondents was the possibility of getting family members sick (mean = 3.89, on scale of 1-5), followed by personally contracting the illness (mean = 3.38). DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous changes and novel sources of adversity for the orthopaedic surgery resident. Contrary to popular opinion, most residents are comfortable with the proposition of providing nonorthopaedic care. The possibility of bringing a pathogen to the home environment and infecting family members seems to be an overarching concern, and efforts to ensure resident and family safety are key.

Overprescribing and Undereducating: a Survey of Pre- and Postoperative Pain Protocols for Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.

PURPOSE: To establish a better understanding of the variations in pain management protocols and prescribing patterns for pediatric patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or repair. METHODS: A 20-question multiple-choice survey was distributed to 3 professional orthopaedic societies to assess the pre-emptive and postoperative pain management prescribing patterns for pediatric patients undergoing ACL reconstruction or repair. Clinical agreement (defined as agreement between >80% of participants) and general agreement (defined as agreement between >60% of participants) were calculated based on responses as previously reported. RESULTS: Clinical agreement was observed among the 68 respondents in use of a single shot nerve block before induction of anesthesia versus continuous use when a peripheral nerve block was used, "always" counseling patients on postoperative pain control, the prescribing of opioids postoperatively, and a lack of change in postoperative protocol when concomitant meniscal repair or meniscectomy was performed. General agreement was observed in the use of a peripheral nerve block, some pre-emptive analgesia practices, and the lack of counseling patients with regard to disposal of unused opioid pain medication postoperatively. Opioids were prescribed by 88% of participants postoperatively, with 48% prescribing 11 to 19 pills and 15% prescribing ≥20 pills. CONCLUSIONS: While pain management practices before and following ACL reconstruction and repair in the pediatric population remain varied, opioids are frequently prescribed postoperatively with many providers neglecting to provide instruction on excess opioid disposal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ACL reconstruction and repair is becoming increasingly common in the pediatric population. Clinical guidelines that establish pre-emptive and postoperative pain-control protocols should be considered to determine safe and optimal pain control throughout the duration of care while minimizing opioid prescribing and consumption.

Resident Selection in the Wake of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Transition to Pass/Fail Scoring.

INTRODUCTION: The numeric score for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 is one of the only universal, objective, scaled criteria for comparing the many students who apply to orthopaedic surgery residency. However, on February 12, 2020, it was announced that Step 1 would be transitioning to pass/fail scoring. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the most important factors used for interview and resident selection after this change and (2) to assess how these factors have changed compared with a previous report on resident selection. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the program directors (PDs) of all 179 orthopaedic surgery programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Questions focused on current resident selection practices and the impact of the Step 1 score transition on expected future practices. RESULTS: A total of 78 PDs (44%) responded to the survey. Over half of PDs (59%) responded that United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) score is the factor that will increase most in importance after Step 1 transitions to pass/fail, and 90% will encourage applicants to include their Step 2 CK score on their applications. The factors rated most important in resident selection from zero to 10 were subinternship performance (9.05), various aspects of interview performance (7.49 to 9.01), rank in medical school (7.95), letters of recommendation (7.90), and Step 2 CK score (7.27). Compared with a 2002 report, performance on manual skills testing, subinternship performance, published research, letters of recommendations, and telephone call on applicants' behalf showed notable increases in importance. DISCUSSION: As Step 2 CK is expected to become more important in the residency application process, current applicant stress on Step 1 scores may simply move to Step 2 CK scores. Performance on subinternships will remain a critical aspect of residency application, as it was viewed as the most important resident selection factor and has grown in importance compared with a previous report.

Efficacy and Validity of Orthopaedic Simulators in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of training simulators on surgical skill measures across randomized controlled trials. The authors hypothesized that simulated training would (1) result in objective improvements in skill acquisition and (2) be heterogeneous regarding the outcomes and types of validity assessed. METHODS: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases were queried for Level I studies on training simulators between 2007 and 2019 in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Exclusion criteria were studies without discrete assessment of skills acquisition after surgical simulator training and level of evidence II to V. The Jadad scale was used to assess the methodological quality of all included articles. Data pertaining to patient demographics, validity measures, simulator types, and study-specific outcome measures were extracted. Meta-analyses adjusted for random effects and heterogeneity analyses (I) were used to compare pooled time-to-completion and performance outcomes among included studies. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies with 494 participants were identified. The most common simulator type involved knee arthroscopy (11 studies, 45.8%). Eight studies reporting time-to-task completion and performance scores were included in the meta-analysis. Virtual reality training was favored in time-to-task completion (mean difference = -82.25 seconds, P = 0.002) and improvement in objective performance scores (mean difference = 1.24, P = 0.02) relative to traditional training. Sensitivity analysis of time-to-task completion based on the length of training interval revealed a mean difference of -45.24 (P = 0.07) and -137.74 (P < 0.001) seconds for the short-term and immediate posttesting subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, improved task efficiency and performance were observed with the use of orthopaedic simulators. However, simulator type, training protocols, and outcome measures were heterogeneous. Future studies are warranted to evaluate financial cost and longitudinal training programs and to standardize outcomes regarding the use of simulators in orthopaedic education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.