ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim: To research scientific undeniable results in the sphere of health environment which are not taken into account in EU legal regulations and to find out ways of possible regulation of such issues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The research is conducted with help of both general and special juridical methods of investigation. The empirical basis: an international legal acts; domestic laws of EU countries; courts' decisions; statistics; juridical, ecological and medical articles. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Legal regulation of ecological standards in all kinds of pollution is much cost-effective and safe for ecology and human rights way in comparison with case law. Results of scientific researches in the sphere of medicine and ecology should be implemented in current legislation.
Subject(s)
Environmental Health , Human Rights , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim: To research approaches to maintaining balance between social and personal interests in the sphere of human right to consent to medical interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The research is conducted with help of both general and special juridical methods of investigation. The empirical basis: an international legal acts; domestic laws of EU countries, the USA and other states; courts' decisions; statistics; juridical and medical articles. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Consent to medical interventions is an absolute right of mentally capable adults and restriction of this right is never too necessary for social interest except for limiting measures due to pandemic or psychiatric disorders threaten. Next of kin or guardian has the right to consent for minors or mentally disabled in their best interests.
