An Evaluation of Sexual Function in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Treated with the Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device.

Purpose: To document the effect of the temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTind; Medi-Tate Ltd, Israel) on sexual function from a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. Materials and Methods: Men were randomized 2:1 between iTind and sham procedure arms. The iTind was placed for 5-7 days and an 18F Foley catheter was inserted and removed for the iTind and sham group, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline, 3, and 12 months postoperatively using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Unblinding occurred at 3 months. Results: We studied 185 men with a mean age of 61.1 ± 6.5 years. There was no difference in SHIM or total IIEF between iTind and sham at 3 months or in the iTind arm at 12 months compared with baseline. Men in the iTind arm without erectile dysfunction at baseline showed an improvement in total IIEF score of +6.07 ± 21.17 points (p = 0.034) at 12 months, in addition to an improvement in ejaculatory function. SHIM scores remained unchanged in all groups, regardless of age, prostate volume, or baseline erectile function. Conclusion: No changes were observed in sexual and ejaculatory function of patients with iTind regardless of a man's age, prostate volume, and baseline sexual function. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02506465.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LiRIS 400 mg in women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome with or without Hunner lesions.

AIMS: Two phase 2 studies were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-releasing intravesical system (LiRIS) in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) with (Study 001; NCT02395042) or without, (Study 002; NCT02411110) Hunner lesions (HL). METHODS: Both were multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and enrolled women aged ≥18 years. In Study 001, patients were randomized 2:1:1 to LiRIS 400 mg/LiRIS 400 mg, placebo/LiRIS 400 mg, or placebo/placebo for a continuous 28 (2 × 14)-day period. In Study 002, patients were randomized 1:1 to LiRIS 400 mg or placebo for a continuous (single treatment) 14-day period. RESULTS: In total, 59 and 131 patients received treatment in Studies 001 and 002, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, the change from baseline to Week 4 of follow-up post-removal in mean daily average bladder numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in either study (Study 001: placebo/placebo, -1.6; LiRIS/LiRIS, -2.7, p = 0.142; placebo/LiRIS, -2.5, p = 0.319; Study 002: LiRIS -1.2; placebo, -1.5, p = 0.505). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in daily worst NRS pain score, number of micturitions/day or urgency episodes/day. There was no clear trend for reduction in number of HL for LiRIS vs placebo. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups in both studies; most were mild or moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: These studies did not demonstrate a treatment effect of LiRIS 400 mg compared with placebo, either in patients with IC/BPS with HL, or in those without HL.

The iTind Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with a temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTind; Medi-Tate Ltd, Hadera, Israel) compared to sham for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men 50 years or older were randomized 2:1 between iTind and sham procedure arms. A self-expanding, temporary nitinol device was placed for 5-7 days and an 18F Foley catheter was inserted and removed for the iTind and sham group, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline, 1.5, 3, and 12 months postoperatively using the IPSS, peak urinary flow rate, residual urine, quality of life, and the International Index of Erectile Function. Unblinding occurred at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 175 men (mean age 61.1 ± 6.5) participated (118 iTind vs 57 sham). A total of 78.6% of patients in the iTind arm showed a reduction of ≥3 points in IPSS, vs 60% of patients in the control arm at 3 months. At 12 months, the iTind group reported a 9.25 decrease in IPSS (P< .0001), a 3.52ml/s increase in peak urinary flow rate (P < .0001) and a 1.9-point reduction in quality of life (P < .0001). Adverse events were typically mild and transient, most Clavien-Dindo grade I or II, in 38.1% of patients in the iTind arm and 17.5% in the control arm. No de novo ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction occurred. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the second-generation iTind provided rapid and sustained improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms for the study period while preserving sexual function.

Early and Consistent Improvements in Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase IV Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase IV study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with overactive bladder. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U or placebo. Assessments over 12 weeks included: change from baseline in urinary incontinence (UI) episodes/day; proportions of patients who achieved 100% and 50% or greater reductions in UI episodes/day; proportion of patients using no incontinence pads in the previous 24 hours; and changes from baseline in micturition frequency, nocturia, urgency UI, Incontinence-Quality of Life, King's Health Questionnaire, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form scores and time to request retreatment. RESULTS: Significant reductions in UI episodes/day were seen with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo within week 1 posttreatment (-2.9 vs -2.0, P = 0.005) through week 12 (coprimary endpoint: -3.5 vs -1.6, P < 0.001). Significantly more onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients achieved 100% (coprimary endpoint) and 50% or greater reductions in UI episodes/day. Decreases in other urinary symptoms were also seen within 1 week with onabotulinumtoxinA that continued through at least week 12. More onabotulinumtoxinA-treated versus placebo-treated patients required no incontinence pads at weeks 1 to 12, and greater improvements in quality of life measurements were seen. Time to request retreatment was significantly longer with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (30.0 weeks vs 13.1 weeks; P < 0.001). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Urinary tract infection was the most commonly observed adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary symptom and quality of life improvements were observed with onabotulinumtoxinA within 1 week of treatment and were sustained for at least 12 weeks.

Low-dose onabotulinumtoxinA improves urinary symptoms in noncatheterizing patients with MS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U in noncatheterizing patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with urinary incontinence (UI) due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind phase III study, patients received onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (n = 66) or placebo (n = 78) as intradetrusor injections via cystoscopy. Assessments included changes from baseline in urinary symptoms, urodynamics, and Incontinence-Quality of Life (I-QOL) total score. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed, including initiation of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) due to urinary retention. RESULTS: OnabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo significantly reduced UI at week 6 (-3.3 episodes/day vs -1.1 episodes/day, p < 0.001; primary endpoint). Significantly greater proportions of onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients achieved 100% UI reduction (53.0% vs 10.3%, p < 0.001). Significant improvements in urodynamics (p < 0.01) were observed with onabotulinumtoxinA. Improvements in I-QOL score were significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA (40.4 vs 9.9, p < 0.001) and ≈3 times the minimally important difference (+11 points). The most common AE was urinary tract infection (25.8%). CIC rates were 15.2% for onabotulinumtoxinA and 2.6% for placebo. CONCLUSION: In noncatheterizing patients with MS, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improved UI and quality of life with lower CIC rates than previously reported with onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01600716. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that compared with placebo, 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections significantly reduce UI and improve quality of life in noncatheterizing patients with MS and NDO.

The Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA or Solifenacin Compared with Placebo in Solifenacin Naïve Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder: Results from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 3b Trial.

PURPOSE: In this double-blind, randomized study we compared the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA or solifenacin vs placebo in patients with overactive bladder who had urinary incontinence and an inadequate response to or were intolerant of an anticholinergic. Post hoc analysis was done to compare the effects of onabotulinumtoxinA vs solifenacin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Solifenacin naïve patients were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U, solifenacin 5 mg, (which could escalate to 10 mg at week 6 according to predefined criteria) or placebo. Patients could request treatment 2 (open label onabotulinumtoxinA) after fulfilling prespecified criteria. End points included a change from baseline in the number of urinary incontinence episodes per day and the proportion of patients with a 100% reduction (dry) in the number of incontinence episodes per day as co-primaries, other urinary symptoms and quality of life, all at week 12, and adverse events. RESULTS: The change from baseline in incontinence episodes per day was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA or solifenacin vs placebo (-3.19 or -2.56, respectively, vs -1.33, both p <0.001). The incontinence reduction was significantly greater for onabotulinumtoxinA vs solifenacin (p = 0.022). At week 12, 33.8% (vs placebo p <0.001), 24.5% (vs placebo p = 0.028) and 11.7% of patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA, solifenacin and placebo, respectively, were dry. After treatment 2, which was open label onabotulinumtoxinA, 43.2%, 37.6% and 41.9% of patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA, solifenacin and placebo groups, respectively, were dry. Significant improvements in other urinary symptoms and quality of life were observed for both active treatments. Urinary tract infection in 25.5% of cases and urinary retention in 6.9% were more common with onabotulinumtoxinA. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and solifenacin was significantly higher than that of placebo. However, onabotulinumtoxinA showed significantly greater decreases in urinary incontinence than solifenacin with a third of patients achieving a 100% incontinence reduction. No unexpected safety signals were observed.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Who Completed 4 Years of Treatment.

PURPOSE: We assessed the year-to-year consistency of outcomes in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity who completed 4 years of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who completed a 52-week phase 3 trial of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence could enter a 3-year open label extension study of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 or 300 U administered as needed for symptom control. This analysis focused on 227 patients who completed the 4-year study. Outcomes assessed by year of treatment included mean treatments per year, mean change from baseline at week 6 in urinary incontinence episodes per day and the I-QOL (Incontinence Quality of Life) total summary score, the proportion of patients with 50% or greater and 100% reductions in urinary incontinence episodes per day, duration of effect and adverse events. RESULTS: Patients reported 4.3 urinary incontinence episodes per day at baseline and received 1.4 to 1.5 onabotulinumtoxinA treatments per year. The decrease in urinary incontinence following onabotulinumtoxinA consistently ranged from -3.4 to -3.9 episodes per day across 4 years. A high proportion of patients achieved 50% or greater and 100% urinary incontinence reductions in each year (range 86.6% to 94.1% and 43.6% to 57.4%, respectively). Consistent and clinically relevant improvements in I-QOL scores were observed in each treatment year. The overall median duration of effect of onabotulinumtoxinA was 9.0 months or greater (range 3.0 to 49.2) and 26.0% or more of patients experienced a duration of effect of 12 months or greater. The most common adverse event was urinary tract infection with no increased incidence with time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity who completed 4 years of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment experienced a consistent duration of treatment effect and year-to-year improvements in urinary incontinence and quality of life with no new safety signals.