Screening for serious mental illness in a correctional setting.

BACKGROUND: Serious mental illness (SMI) is more common among adults in correctional settings than in the general population. No standard exists for SMI screening across correctional settings; SMI therefore often goes undetected in these facilities. Placing individuals with unidentified SMI who are incarcerated in general population cells increases their risk for self-harming behaviors, suicide, and for being victims or perpetrators of exploitation and violence. METHODS: This article describes a quantitative, descriptive study conducted to evaluate the use of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) tool to screen for possible SMI among individuals in a jail setting. RESULTS: A total of 89 individuals who were incarcerated in one jail setting were screened either with the facility's internally developed standard medical questionnaire (SMQ) or with the BJMHS. Findings showed that 28% screened positive for possible SMI using the BJMHS as compared with only 3% using the SMQ. CONCLUSION: The BJMHS flagged a higher number of possible instances of SMI than the jail's SMQ, potentially signifying its screening superiority. Identification of SMI leads to better care for individuals who are incarcerated, and it increases safety for the individual with SMI, the greater jail population, and jail staff. Findings from this study were shared with system leadership, which has replaced other screening tools with the BJMHS in at least 250 correctional facilities throughout the US.

Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: From 1995, the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) has regularly investigated the progress of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe, and identified key barriers and drivers of this. The most recent 'Investigation of the Hospital Pharmacy Profession in Europe' was conducted from November 2022 to March 2023. METHODS: The online questionnaire was sent to all hospital pharmacies in EAHP member countries. The investigation was drafted using the same questions as the 2015 baseline survey. Where possible and relevant, responses were compared with the data from previous surveys that monitored the implementation of the EAHP statements. Keele University, Centre for Medicines Optimisation, School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, UK analysed the data. RESULTS: The overall number of responses was 653, with a better response rate of 19% compared with 14% in 2018 statements survey. The findings indicated that participating hospital pharmacies have similar characteristics to previous surveys. Section 1 (Introductory statements and governance), section 2 (Selection, procurement and distribution), section 3 (Production and compounding), section 5 (Patient safety and quality assurance) questions were generally answered positively, with results ranging from 52% to 90%. However, results for section 4 (Clinical pharmacy services) returned lower levels of positivity, with responses from 8 of the 15 questions being less than 60%. When asked what is preventing hospital pharmacists from achieving implementation of these activities, most answers were limited capacity, not considered to be a priority by managers, or other healthcare professionals do this. The last section focused on self-assessment and action planning, with fewer than 50% of positive responses; COVID-19 preparedness and vaccines with mixed positive and negative responses. Furthermore, implementation of the falsified medicines directive impacted the medication handling processes in 50% or more of the answers. Regarding sustainability, the majority (59%) of respondents felt a greater focus should be on sustainability from an organisational or management perspective. CONCLUSION: Results offer valuable insights into the hospital pharmacy profession throughout Europe. While there have been improvements in certain areas, challenges remain, particularly in implementing clinical pharmacy services. The findings provide a foundation for further dialogue, advocacy, and strategic planning to advance the role of hospital pharmacists and enhance patient care in Europe's healthcare systems.

Results of EAHP's 2023 shortages survey.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP)'s 2023 shortages survey was to collect data on causes and mitigation strategies of shortages of medicines and medical devices and their impact on patient care. The survey targeted hospital pharmacists (HPs), physicians (PHYs), nurses (NRS) and other healthcare professionals (OHCPs). A separate set of questions addressed patients (PTNs). METHODS: A 49-question survey was carried out by a team at EAHP, collecting information from European HPs, PTNs, NRS, PHYs and OTHCs on shortages of medicines and medical devices in their respective countries. The survey ran from 27 February to 19 May 2023. The results were analysed by EAHP. RESULTS: There were 1497 HP responses to the 2023 survey. While 95% (n=1429) of HPs and 86% (n=127) of OHCPs consider medicine shortages an ongoing problem, 84% (n=48) of PHYs and 68% (n=15) of NRS also agreed. Shortages of active pharmaceutical ingredients (77%, n=1148), manufacturing (67%, n=1007) and supply chain problems (50%, n=752) are major causes of shortages according to HPs as well as NRS and OHCPs; PHYs (49%, n=18) consider pricing to be the driver. More than 60% (n=765) of HPs, 55% (n=11) of NRS, 57% (n=30) of PHYs and 46% (n=56) of OHCPs experienced shortages of medical devices in 2022. Antimicrobials were most affected, according to all respondent groups, followed by analgesics, anaesthetics, cardiovascular and paediatric medicines. HPs (59%, n=269), NRS (57%, n=4), OHCPs (56%, n=37) and PHYs (54%, n=14) consider delays in care as the main consequence of medication shortages. CONCLUSIONS: Shortages of medicines and medical devices affect healthcare services and patient care. Increased transparency and access to information regarding ongoing and emerging shortages as well as better preparedness of healthcare professionals is crucial to their effective management.