Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 93: 105706, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802305

ABSTRACT

Given the high attention to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC), there is an urgent need for the development of rapid and reliable approaches for the screening of large numbers of chemicals with respect to their endocrine disruption potential. This study aimed at the assessment of the correlation between the predicted results of a battery of in silico tools and the reported observed adverse effects from in vivo reproductive toxicity studies. We used VirtualToxLab (VTL) software and the EndocrineDisruptome (ED) online tool to evaluate the binding affinities to nuclear receptors of 17 pesticides, 7 of which were classified as reprotoxic substances under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). Then, we aligned the results of the in silico modelling with data from ToxCast assays and in vivo reproductive toxicity studies. We combined results from different in silico tools in two different ways to improve the characteristics of their predictive performance. Reproductive toxicity can be caused by various mechanisms; however, in this study, we demonstrated that the use of a battery of in silico tools for assessing the binding to nuclear receptors can be useful for identifying hazardous compounds and for prioritizing further studies.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Pesticides , Pesticides/toxicity , Reproductive Health , Computer Simulation , Endocrine System/metabolism , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Endocrine Disruptors/metabolism , Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
2.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 60: 71-75, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31100379

ABSTRACT

In Ukraine Globally Harmonized System of classification of chemicals has not been implemented yet. In this article we analyze differences between GHS/CLP classification systems and Hygienic Classification of Pesticides by the Degree of Hazard currently in force in Ukraine in respect of approach and criteria for classification of effects on skin. As a case study, we conducted in silico modelling of herbicide imazamox using skin irritation/corrosion modules of ToxTree. The prediction of ToxTree was "Not Corrosive to skin". Then skin irritation and skin corrosion in vitro tests (OECD TGs 439, 431) were conducted. Classification of this substance based on in vitro and in vivo results according to GHS/CLP was the same, while it was not possible based on in vitro results to assign certain hazard class of Ukrainian classification due to difference in its and GHS/CLP criteria. However, ongoing process of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with EU will give opportunity not only use alternative methods, but also adopt most recent advances and incorporate data from non-animal methods directly into classification criteria.


Subject(s)
Caustics/classification , Imidazoles/classification , Irritants/classification , Pesticides/classification , Animals , Caustics/toxicity , Computer Simulation , European Union , Humans , Imidazoles/toxicity , Irritants/toxicity , Pesticides/toxicity , Skin Irritancy Tests/methods , Ukraine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...