Electronic Reporting Systems in Pharmacovigilance: The Implementation of VigiFlow in Brazil.

Pharmacovigilance is defined by the World Health Organization as the science and practice related to the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In a well-functioning pharmacovigilance system, information on possible ADRs is collected from patients, health professionals and marketing authorisation holders. Of all data sources for drug safety monitoring, spontaneous reporting systems provide the highest volume of information at the lowest maintenance cost and have proven their value in the early detection of product-related safety issues. At the beginning of 2018, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária-Anvisa) decided to replace the national electronic reporting system in Brazil (Notivisa) with the system provided by Uppsala Monitoring Centre (VigiFlow) for ADR reporting. This paper describes that process and reports on the progress made by Anvisa in terms of making Brazil compliant with international pharmacovigilance standards as well as significantly increasing the number of individual case safety reports collected.

Regulatory Requirements and Innovation: A Comparison of the Dermatologic Antifungal Drug Product Markets in Brazil and United States.

BACKGROUND: Development of novel dermatological topical products for the treatment of cutaneous fungal infections is a constant necessity, especially in developing countries. Through public health policies, many developing countries have facilitated in the last decades the entry of generic products, which can be superficially seen as a threat to innovation. To verify whether regulatory requirements, or the waiving of some requirements, could have an impact on innovation, we performed a detailed technical comparison of the dermatologic antifungal markets of Brazil and of the United States, taking Brazil as an example of a developing country with more lenient requirements regarding the registration of generic topical drug products. METHODS: The official databank of ANVISA (DATAVISA) and of US Food and Drug Administration (Orange Book) were assessed for valid topical dermatological antifungal drug products registered. RESULTS: The Brazilian market has a greater number of registered drug products encompassing a greater variety of drug substances than the US, but the latter comprises more products with novel technologies. In both countries, cream was the predominant dosage form and imidazoles were the major substance group. Ketoconazole was the lead active substance in Brazil and ciclopirox was the lead drug in the US. Generic products dominated both markets. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the great number of registered products, the Brazilian market lacks the latest technologies, reflecting that the ease of generics registration is not accompanied by innovation.

Topical ophthalmic antimicrobials: unfulfilled demands and possibility of new investments in Brazil and in the United States

In general, topical ophthalmic drug products, especially those used for treating infections, present low effectiveness because of various reasons, from unfavorable drug physicochemical properties to physiological protective mechanisms of the eye. The fact is such group of products holds room for improvement, which could mean the development of better drugs or dosage forms. To achieve this, the knowledge of market composition is essential. The present work studied and compared the antimicrobial ophthalmic markets of Brazil and of the United States (US). Official databank of Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency and of US Food and Drug Administration were assessed for registered antimicrobial topical ophthalmic drug products. Brazilian market has registered greater number of drug products (119) than the US (94), but the latter involves more variety of substances and dosage forms. In both countries, non-innovative products registered as solutions of antibacterials, especially fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides lead the market. Despite the clinical demand, the US has only one group of antimycotics (polyenes) registered, while in Brazil, there is not any ophthalmic antimycotic product marketed. This study evidences there is not only space for development of newer drugs and formulations but also a demand for already existing technologies and products in both countries.