3D preoperative predictions of in vivo hip stability and edge loading for neutral and lipped liners.

Hip dislocation is one of the leading causes of failure and revision surgery for total hip arthroplasty. To reduce dislocation rates, lipped liners have been designed with an elevated portion of the rim, to increase jump distance and maintain greater contact area. While it has been documented that lipped liners help reduce dislocation, the objective of this study is to investigate whether lipped liners also help reduce smaller instances of hip micromotion, separation, and edge loading. This study uses an advanced three-dimensional preoperative planning tool to analyze 10 patients, each implanted with both a neutral and lipped liner. Patients within the simulation performed stance phase of gait, and each cup was implanted with the rotation center aligned with the preoperative acetabulum center as well as shifted medially by 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm, yielding 120 total simulations. Specific postoperative outcomes-of-interest included specified component offset, resultant in vivo hip forces, hip separation, and contact area to evaluate edge loading. The planner predicted a reduction in hip separation and an increase in articulating contact area for when using a lipped liner compared to a neutral liner. Additionally, regardless of liner type, increases in hip separation corresponded to decreases in contact area, therefore resulting in edge loading of the liner. Together, this indicates that improper component alignment and offsets may lead to an increase in hip separation and edge loading, but the use of a lipped liner may provide improved stability and resistance to this micromotion.

Determination of optimal component positioning in THA using 3D preoperative planning.

Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning tools can offer surgeons and design engineers detailed feedback and additional opportunities for clinical advancements. The objective of this study is to use a 3D total hip arthroplasty preoperative planning tool to compare femoral component alignment for three different stem systems. The planning tool in this study used morphology data of femoral bones gathered from a CT database, seven from postoperative patients and 63 from statistical shape models (SSMs), to suggest specific implant sizes and optimal placements in 3D to match each specific bone model. Retrospective validations of predicted stem size and femoral version were first performed by comparing planner-chosen and surgeon-implanted stem sizes and version angles for the seven postoperative patients. Next, the alignment of three different stem systems was evaluated using bone models generated from SSMs, with a quantitative focus on component head positioning. In the validation study, the planner accurately selected stem size and orientation compared to the surgeon for all assessed subjects. In the stem evaluation, the three stem systems yielded different accuracies in component placement, with the newest stem system demonstrating the closest restoration of anatomical head center location. It is evident that new stem designs may have the potential for increased accuracy over their predecessors, demonstrating that new stem designs can offer improved intraoperative and postoperative alignment potential. The 3D preoperative planning tools can provide novel and reliable data to both surgeons and design engineers, which can ultimately improve clinical outcomes and future implant designs.

Alignment and mechanics evaluation for a compaction broach stem versus a blade style proximal press fit stem using 3-Dimensional planning.

Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning tools can be used to help plan and compare component alignment scenarios for different total hip arthroplasty systems to ultimately improve postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. The objective of this study is to use 3D preoperative planning tools based on patient-specific bone models to compare two different stem designs, specifically a compaction broach stem and a proximal press fit stem. The planner uses patient-specific proximal femoral bone morphology to suggest a specific implant size and placement. The planner then allows for preoperative predictions of component head positioning, stem fit within the canal, and potential cortical bone reaming that must be done, as well as postoperative predictions of stability and mechanics. The stems were evaluated to determine the accuracy of stem placement, the theoretical volumetric bone removal/reaming required to achieve a desired fit, and the associated postoperative mechanics. This study demonstrated that there was a difference in component alignment and predicted postoperative mechanics between a compaction broach stem and a press fit stem, with the compaction broach stem allowing for more accurate alignment with less required bone removal, resulting in improved postoperative stability and mechanics. This study also demonstrated that much of the stem misalignment for both systems occurred in the anterior/posterior direction. Overall, 3D preoperative planning offers significant benefits and novel intraoperative insight, and the industry should continue to enhance their THA preoperative planning tools.

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics. METHODS: In vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend. RESULTS: At full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.

In Vivo Weight-Bearing Kinematics for Constrained Versus Traditional Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Cohorts Compared to the Normal Knee.

BACKGROUND: Constrained inserts in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may offer additional stability, but can this insert type allow unrestricted movements or will the extra conformity cause kinematic conflict with the cam-post mechanism in deeper flexion? The objective of this study was to evaluate the weight-bearing kinematics of both traditional and constrained bicruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA inserts to determine if the rollback induced by the cam-post mechanism will work in unison with the constrained polyethylene insert. METHODS: This study used previously published 3-dimensional model fitting techniques to compare weight-bearing flexion and femoro-tibial condylar motion patterns for 20 patients who had a traditional insert, 20 patients who had a constrained insert, and 10 previously published nonimplanted knees, all performing a deep knee bend activity while under fluoroscopic surveillance. RESULTS: The results from this study indicate that subjects having a bicruciate stabilized TKA experienced similar postoperative kinematics for both constrained and unconstrained insert options, comparable to normal knees. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects in this study having either a constrained or traditional insert experienced progressive rollback of both condyles, with the lateral condyle rolling more posterior than the medial condyle, leading to axial rotation. Although less in magnitude, these results were comparable to the normal knee in pattern, indicating that kinematic conflict did not occur for subjects having a constrained insert.

Advancements in total knee arthroplasty kinematics: 3D implant computer aided design model creation through X-ray or fluoroscopic images.

BACKGROUND: 3D-to-2D fluoroscopic registration is a popular and important step for analyzing total-knee-arthroplasty weight-bearing kinematics. Unfortunately, in vivo analyses using these techniques cannot be completed if the associated computer-aided design implant models are not available. This study introduces a novel method that enables the accessible computation of knee replacement patients' kinematics from fluoroscopy, achieved through the reconstruction of 3-dimensional knee component models using a limited set of 2-dimensional X-ray or fluoroscopic images. METHODS: The proposed non-rigid morphing algorithm, based on the coherent point drift algorithm, scales and transforms the shape of the template model to fit with the silhouette of the corresponding fluoroscopic images without changing the structure of the knee implant. While a greater number of fluoroscopic images can lead to higher accuracy, our study utilizes only 4 images. FINDINGS: The morphed models show excellent results in comparison with known models with a 0.52 mm average root-mean-square error and a 2.82 mm largest source error for 17 tested knee models of various implant types. The proposed algorithm also enables direct output of patient kinematics using fluoroscopy, with an average error of only 0.54 ± 0.42 mm for femorotibial contact and 0.86 ± 0.34 degrees for axial rotation. INTERPRETATION: A novel methodology was introduced to overcome common 3-dimentional to 2-dimensional registration limitations by recreating entire families of 3 dimensional models from a limited number of fluoroscopic images for both cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized knee replacement implants. Our algorithm has demonstrated high levels of accuracy with multiple potential extended applications.

Anatomic vs Dome Patella: Is There a Difference Between Fixed- vs Mobile-Bearing Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties?

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that the patella, working in conjunction with both medial and lateral femoral condyles, can influence kinematic parameters such as posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation. The objective of this study is to determine the in vivo kinematics of subjects implanted with a fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a specific focus on evaluating the impact that Anatomic and Medialized Dome patellar components have on tibiofemoral kinematic patterns. METHODS: Tibiofemoral kinematics were assessed for 40 subjects; 20 with an anatomic patella and 20 with a dome patella. Within these groups, 10 subjects received an FB PS TKA and 10 subjects received an MB PS TKA. All subjects were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing a deep knee bend activity. Kinematics were collected during specific intervals to determine similarities and differences in regard to patella and bearing type. RESULTS: The greatest variation in kinematics was detected between the 2 Anatomic patellar groups. Specifically, the MB-Anatomic subjects experienced greater translation of the lateral condyle, the highest magnitude of axial rotation, and the highest range of motion compared to the FB-Anatomic subjects. Subjects with a Dome Patella displayed much variability among the average kinematics, with all parameters between FB and MB cohorts being similar. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study suggest that subjects with an Anatomic patellar component could have more normal kinematic patterns with an MB PS TKA as opposed to an FB PS TKA, while subjects with a Dome patella could achieve similar kinematics regardless of TKA type.

A novel approach to 3D bone creation in minutes : 3D ultrasound.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to assess the use of ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free imaging modality to reconstruct 3D anatomy of the knee for use in preoperative templating in knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Using an US system, which is fitted with an electromagnetic (EM) tracker that is integrated into the US probe, allows 3D tracking of the probe, femur, and tibia. The raw US radiofrequency (RF) signals are acquired and, using real-time signal processing, bone boundaries are extracted. Bone boundaries and the tracking information are fused in a 3D point cloud for the femur and tibia. Using a statistical shaping model, the patient-specific surface is reconstructed by optimizing bone geometry to match the point clouds. An accuracy analysis was conducted for 17 cadavers by comparing the 3D US models with those created using CT. US scans from 15 users were compared in order to examine the effect of operator variability on the output. RESULTS: The results revealed that the US bone models were accurate compared with the CT models (root mean squared error (RM)S: femur, 1.07 mm (SD 0.15); tibia, 1.02 mm (SD 0.13). Additionally, femoral landmarking proved to be accurate (transepicondylar axis: 1.07° (SD 0.65°); posterior condylar axis: 0.73° (SD 0.41°); distal condylar axis: 0.96° (SD 0.89°); medial anteroposterior (AP): 1.22 mm (SD 0.69); lateral AP: 1.21 mm (SD 1.02)). Tibial landmarking errors were slightly higher (posterior slope axis: 1.92° (SD 1.31°); and tubercle axis: 1.91° (SD 1.24°)). For implant sizing, 90% of the femora and 60% of the tibiae were sized correctly, while the remainder were only one size different from the required implant size. No difference was observed between moderate and skilled users. CONCLUSION: The 3D US bone models were proven to be closely matched compared with CT and suitable for preoperative planning. The 3D US is radiation-free and offers numerous clinical opportunities for bone visualization rapidly during clinic visits, to enable preoperative planning with implant sizing. There is potential to extend its application to 3D dynamic ligament balancing, and intraoperative registration for use with robots and navigation systems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):81-86.

Effects of the Medial Plateau Bearing Insert Conformity on Mid-Flexion Paradoxical Motion in a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Design.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common kinematic abnormalities reported for posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design is paradoxical anterior sliding during early and mid-flexion. PS TKAs have been designed such that the cam-post mechanism does not engage until later in flexion, making these implants vulnerable to anterior sliding during early and mid-flexion. The objective of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effect of increasing bearing conformity on a PS TKA. METHODS: Using a validated computational model of the knee joint, the sagittal conformity of the medial plateau of a PS TKA design was altered. Three scenarios were created and evaluated for mechanics: (1) baseline conformity, (2) increased conformity, and (3) decreased conformity. RESULTS: From full extension to approximately 70° of knee flexion, the medial condyle demonstrated minimal anterior sliding for the increased medial conformity design but revealed anterior sliding of 2 and 4 mm for the baseline and decreased conformity designs, respectively. After cam-post engagement, the medial condyle consistently rolled back for all 3 designs. The lateral condyle experienced consistent rollback throughout the entire flexion range for all 3 designs. However, femorotibial contact force was higher for the increased conformity design, peaking at 3.13 times body weight (×BW) compared to 3.0 × BW contact force for other 2 designs. CONCLUSION: Increasing medial conformity of the bearing insert appears to reduce mid-flexion sliding for PS TKA designs, although this comes at the expense of increased femorotibial forces. This could be due to kinematic conflicts that may be introduced with highly constraining designs.

Effects of Posterior Tibial Slope on a Posterior Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics and Kinetics.

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that increasing posterior tibial slope can influence condylar rollback and play a role in increasing knee flexion. However, the effects of tibial slope on knee kinematics are not well studied. The objective of this study is to assess the effects of tibial slope on femorotibial kinematics and kinetics for a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty design. METHODS: A validated forward solution model of the knee was implemented to predict the femorotibial biomechanics of a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with varied posterior slopes of 0°-8° at 2° intervals. All analyses were conducted on a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity. RESULTS: Increasing the tibial slope shifted the femoral component posteriorly at full extension but decreased the overall femoral rollback throughout flexion. With no tibial slope, the lateral condyle contacted the polyethylene 6 mm posterior of the midline, but as the slope increased to 8°, the femur shifted an extra 5 mm, to 11 mm posterior of the tibial midline. Similar shifts were observed for the medial condyle, ranging from 7 mm posterior to 13 mm posterior, respectively. Increasing posterior slope decreased the posterior cruciate ligament tension and femorotibial contact force. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that, although increasing the tibial slope shifted the femur posteriorly at full extension and maximum flexion, it reduced the amount of femoral rollback. Despite the lack of rollback, a more posterior location of condyles suggests lower chances of bearing impingement of the posterior femur and may explain why increasing slope may lead to higher knee flexion.

In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important Are the Roles of Femoral Geometry and the Cruciate Ligaments?

BACKGROUND: While posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) implants are a more common total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, newer bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKAs are now being considered as an option for many patients, especially those that are younger. While PCR TKAs remove the ACL, the BCR TKA designs keep both cruciate ligaments intact, as it is believed that the resection of the ACL greatly affects the overall kinematic patterns of TKA designs. The objectives of this study are to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with either a PCR or BCR TKA and to compare the in vivo kinematic patterns to the normal knee during flexion. These objectives were achieved with an emphasis on understanding the roles of the cruciate ligaments, as well as the role of changes in femoral geometry of nonimplanted anatomical femurs vs implanted subjects having a metal femoral component. METHODS: Tibiofemoral kinematics of 50 subjects having a PCR (40 subjects) or BCR (10 subjects) TKA were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing a deep knee bend activity. The kinematics were compared to previously published normal knee data (10 subjects). Kinematics were determined during specific intervals of flexion where the ACL or PCL was most dominant. RESULTS: In early flexion, subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more normal-like kinematic patterns, possibly attributed to the ACL. In mid-flexion, both TKA groups exhibited variable kinematic patterns, which could be due to the transitional cruciate ligament function period. In deeper flexion, both TKA functioned more similar to the normal knee, leading to the assumption that the PCL was properly balanced and functioning in the TKA groups. Interestingly, during late flexion (after 90°), the kinematic patterns for all three groups appeared to be statistically similar. CONCLUSION: Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced greater weight-bearing flexion than the BCR TKA group. Subjects having a BCR TKA exhibited a more normal-like kinematic pattern in early and late flexion. The normal knee subjects achieved greater lateral condyle rollback and axial rotation compared to the TKA groups.

Can an OA Knee Brace Effectively Offload the Medial Condyle? An In Vivo Fluoroscopic Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies evaluating the effectiveness of OA offloading knee braces focused on qualitative results. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of an off-loading knee brace with respect to in vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics to quantitatively measure the changes in medial joint space and relative bone alignment when wearing the brace. METHODS: Twenty subjects diagnosed with medial compartmental joint space narrowing and varus deformity due to OA were recruited. During fluoroscopic surveillance, subjects performed normal gait on a treadmill with and without the brace. Images were sequenced at heel-strike and mid-stance during the weight-bearing portion of gait. 3D-to-2D image registration was performed on each subject using 3D bone models derived from CT segmentation and 3D ultrasound scans. RESULTS: Medial joint space was to increase when the brace was applied in all subjects (1.6 ± 0.7 mm at heel-strike, 1.6 ± 0.8 mm at mid-stance) and was statistically significant (P < .001). It was also found that sixteen of the twenty subjects experienced a medial joint space increase of more than 1.0 mm during heel-strike while thirteen of twenty experienced this change at mid-stance. While wearing the brace, over half of the subjects experienced a valgus correction to their alignment. CONCLUSIONS: All subjects in this study experienced a positive change in the medial joint space when wearing the offloading knee brace. In addition, many subjects also saw joint space values representative of previously documented, nonosteoarthritic subjects and valgus changes in bone alignment more akin to the normal knee.

Development of a hip joint mathematical model to assess implanted and non-implanted hips under various conditions.

While total hip arthroplasty does generally improve patient quality of life, current systems can still yield atypical forces, premature component wear, and abnormal kinematics compared to native joints. Specifically, common complications include instability, separation, sliding, and edge loading within the hip joint. Unfortunately, evaluating potential solutions to these issues can be costly and time-consuming. Fortunately, mathematical modeling is an accurate and efficient tool that can be used to evaluate potential solutions. A forward dynamics mathematical model of the hip allows users to virtually insert a hip implant into a theoretical patient and observe the predicted postoperative mechanics. The objective of this study is therefore to develop, validate, and use a fully functional forward solution mathematical model that allows for a comparison between various hip implant designs and a determination of factors leading to in vivo hip separation, instability, and edge loading. The model presented herein has been validated kinetically against telemetric data and kinematically against fluoroscopic data. It was determined through this research that shifting of the joint rotation center during total hip arthroplasty has the potential to yield postoperative instability, and surgical errors can exacerbate these outcomes. However, the relationships between subject-specific joint shifting and hip instability are extremely complex, and therefore it becomes essential for surgeons to focus on implanting components as accurately as possible to minimize these risks.

A Validated Forward Solution Dynamics Mathematical Model of the Knee Joint: Can It Be an Effective Alternative for Implant Evaluation?

BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling is among the most common computational tools for assessing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) mechanics of different implant designs and surgical alignments. The main objective of this study is to describe and validate a forward solution mathematical of the knee joint to investigate the effects of TKA design and surgical conditions on TKA outcomes. METHODS: A 12-degree of freedom mathematical model of the human knee was developed. This model includes the whole lower extremity of the human body and comprises major muscles and ligaments at the knee joint. The muscle forces are computed using a proportional-integral-derivative controller, and the joint forces are calculated using a contact detection algorithm. The model was validated using telemetric implants and fluoroscopy, and the sensitivity analyses were performed to determine how sensitive the model is to both implant design, which was analyzed by varying medial conformity of the polyethylene, and surgical alignment, which was analyzed by varying the posterior tibial tilt. RESULTS: The model predicted the tibiofemoral joint forces with an average accuracy of 0.14× body weight (BW), 0.13× BW, and 0.17× BW root-mean-square errors for lateral, medial, and total tibiofemoral contact forces. With fluoroscopy, the kinematics were validated with an average accuracy of 0.44 mm, 0.62 mm, and 0.77 root-mean-square errors for lateral anteroposterior position, medial anteroposterior position, and axial rotation, respectively. Increasing medial conformity resulted in reducing the paradoxical anterior sliding midflexion. Furthermore, increasing posterior tibial slopes shifted the femoral contact point more posterior on the bearing and reduced the tension in the posterior cruciate ligament. CONCLUSION: A forward solution dynamics model of the knee joint was developed and validated using telemetry devices and fluoroscopy data. The results of this study suggest that a validated mathematical model can be used to predict the effects of component design and surgical conditions on TKA outcomes.

Varus alignment after total knee arthroplasty results in greater axial rotation during deep knee bend activity.

BACKGROUNDS: The correlation between in vivo knee kinematics and alignment has not been fully elucidated. Recently, similar or better clinical outcomes have been reported by restoration of mild varus alignment after total knee arthroplasty for preoperative varus knees. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative alignment on knee kinematics during a deep knee bend activity. METHODS: In vivo knee kinematics of 36 knees (25 patients) implanted with tri-condylar total knee arthroplasty were analyzed with a three dimensional model fitting approach using fluoroscopy. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, individual video frames were digitized at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Postoperative coronal and sagittal alignments were assessed using radiographs, and rotational alignment was assessed with computed tomography. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlations between the alignment data and kinematic factors. FINDINGS: Correlation analysis showed that coronal alignment was significantly correlated with knee kinematics. The varus alignment of the limb and tibial component led to a greater axial rotation from full extension to maximum flexion and more rotated position in the mid to deep flexion range. Neither the rotational alignment of the femoral nor tibial components showed significant correlation with axial rotation from full extension to maximum flexion. INTERPRETATION: Varus alignment resulted in greater axial rotation, which could represent near-normal knee kinematics. The current study can be a kinematic rationale reporting similar or better clinical and functional outcomes for the total knee arthroplasty with residual varus alignment.

In Vivo Knee Kinematics for a Cruciate Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty Having Both a Symmetrical Femoral and Tibial Component.

BACKGROUND: Early total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs were symmetrical, but lead to complications due to over-constraint leading to loosening and poor flexion. Next-generation TKAs have been designed to include asymmetry, pertaining to the trochlear groove, femoral condylar shapes, and/or the tibial component. More recently, an advanced posterior cruciate sacrificing (PCS) TKA was designed to include both a symmetrical femoral component with a patented V-shaped trochlear groove and a symmetrical tibial component with an ultracongruent insert, in an attempt to reduce inventory costs. Because previous PCS TKA designs produced variable results, the objective of this study is to determine and evaluate the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this symmetrical TKA. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects, implanted with symmetrical PCS fixed-bearing TKA, were asked to perform a weight-bearing deep knee bend (DKB) while under fluoroscopic surveillance. A 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional registration technique was used to determine each subject's anteroposterior translation of lateral and medial femoral condyles as well as tibiofemoral axial rotation and their weight-bearing knee flexion. RESULTS: During the DKB, the average active maximum weight-bearing flexion was 111.7° ± 13.3°. On average, from full extension to maximum knee flexion, subjects experienced -2.5 ± 2.0 mm of posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.5 ± 2.2 mm of medial condyle motion in the anterior direction. This medial condyle motion was consistent for the majority of the subjects, with the lateral condyle exhibiting rollback from 0° to 60° of flexion and then experienced an average anterior motion of 0.3 mm from 60° to 90° of knee flexion. On average, the subjects in this study experienced 6.6°± 3.3° of axial rotation, with most of the rotation occurring in early flexion, averaging 4.9°. CONCLUSION: Although subjects in this study were implanted with a symmetrical PCS TKA, they did experience femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and a normal-like pattern of axial rotation, although less in magnitude than the normal knee. The normal axial rotation pattern occurred because the lateral condyle rolled in the posterior direction, while the medial condyle moved in the anterior direction. Interestingly, the magnitude of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation for subjects in this study was similar in magnitude reported in previous studies pertaining to asymmetrical TKA designs. It is proposed that more patients be analyzed having this TKA implanted by other surgeons.

In Vivo Determination and Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Kinematics for Normal, Preoperative Degenerative, and Postoperative Implanted Hips.

BACKGROUND: The study objective is to analyze subjects having a normal hip and compare in vivo kinematics to subjects before and after receiving a total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty subjects, 10 with a normal hip and 10 with a preoperative, degenerative hip were analyzed performing normal walking on level ground while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Seven preoperative subjects returned after receiving a total hip arthroplasty using the anterior surgical approach by a single surgeon. Using 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional registration techniques, joint models were overlayed on fluoroscopic images to obtain transformation matrices in the image space. From these images, displacements of the femoral head and acetabulum centers were computed, as well as changes in contact patches between the 2 surfaces throughout the gait cycle. RESULTS: Implanted hips experienced the least amount of separation, compression, and overall sliding throughout the entire gait cycle, but they did show signs of edge loading contact patterns. Conversely, the degenerative hips experienced the most compression, sliding, and separation, with the maximum amount of sliding being 6.9 mm. The normal group ranged in the middle, with the maximum amount of sliding being 1.75 mm. CONCLUSION: Current analysis revealed trends that degenerative hips experience more abnormal hip kinematics that leads to higher articulating surface forces and stresses within the acetabulum. None of the implanted hips experienced hip separation.

Kinematic Performance of Gradually Variable Radius Posterior-Stabilized Primary TKA During Various Activities: An In Vivo Study Using Fluoroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with gradually variable radii (G-curve) femoral condylar geometry is now available. It is believed that a G-curve design would lead to more mid-flexion stability leading to reduced incidence of paradoxical anterior slide. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this type of TKA under various conditions of daily living. METHODS: Tibiofemoral kinematics of 35 patients having posterior-stabilized TKA with G-curve design were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing three activities: weight-bearing deep knee bend, gait, and walking down a ramp. The subjects were assessed for range of motion, condylar translation, axial rotation, cam-spine engagement, and condylar lift-off. RESULTS: The average weight-bearing flexion during deep knee bend was 111.4°. On average, the subjects exhibited 5.4 mm of posterior rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.0 mm of the medial condyle from full extension to maximum knee flexion. The femur consistently rotated externally with flexion, and the average axial rotation was 5.2°. Overall movement of the condyles during gait and ramp-down activity was small. No incidence of condylar lift-off was observed. CONCLUSION: Subjects in this study experienced consistent magnitudes of posterior femoral rollback and external rotation of the femur with weight-bearing flexion. The variation is similar to that previously reported for normal knee where the lateral condyle moves consistently posterior compared to the medial condyle. Subjects experienced low overall mid-flexion paradoxical anterior sliding and no incidence of condylar lift-off leading to mid-flexion stability.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics.

Knee kinematics is an analysis of motion pattern that is utilized to assess a comparative, biomechanical performance of healthy nonimplanted knees, injured nonimplanted knees, and various prosthetic knee designs. Unfortunately, a consensus between implanted knee kinematics and outcomes has not been reached. One might hypothesize that the kinematic variances between the nonimplanted and implanted knee might play a role in patient dissatisfaction following TKA. There is a wide range of TKA designs available today. With such variety, it is important for surgeons and engineers to understand the various geometries and kinematic profiles of available prostheses. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with the pertinent information related to TKA kinematics.

In Vivo Kinematic Comparison of a Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty and the Normal Knee Using Fluoroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The bicruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) features asymmetrical bearing geometry and dual substitution for the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Previous TKA designs have not fully replicated normal knee motion, and they are characterized by lower magnitudes of overall rollback and axial rotation than the normal knee. METHODS: In vivo kinematics were derived for 10 normal knees and 40-second generation BCS TKAs all implanted by a single surgeon. Mobile fluoroscopy and three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional registration was used to analyze anterior-posterior motion of the femoral condyles and femorotibial axial rotation during weight-bearing flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted at the 95% confidence level. RESULTS: From 0° to 30° of knee flexion, the BCS subjects exhibited similar patterns of femoral rollback and axial rotation compared to normal knee subjects. From 30° to 60° of knee flexion, BCS subjects experienced negligible anterior-posterior motions and axial rotation while normal knees continued to rollback and externally rotate. Between 60° and 90° the BCS resumed posterior motion and, after 90°, axial rotation increased in a normal-like fashion. CONCLUSION: Similarities in early flexion kinematics suggest that the anterior cam-post is supporting normal-like anterior-posterior motion in the BCS subjects. Likewise, lateral femoral rollback and external rotation of the femur in later flexion provides evidence for appropriate substitution of the PCL via the posterior cam-post. Being discrete in nature, the dual cam-post mechanism does not lend itself to adequate substitution of the cruciate ligaments in mid-flexion during which anterior cruciate ligament tension is decreasing and PCL tension is increasing in the normal knee.