Development of the national consensus statement on ear health and hearing check recommendations for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged under 6 years attending primary care: systematic scoping review and e-Delphi.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of long-term, often asymptomatic, middle ear infection in young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children is more likely to be achieved when ear health and hearing checks are routinely undertaken in primary healthcare. Evidence consistently demonstrates the adverse impacts of this condition on the development and wellbeing of children and their families. We aimed to develop feasible, evidence- and consensus-based primary healthcare recommendations addressing the components and timing of ear health and hearing checks for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged under 6 years, not already known to have, nor being actively managed for, ear and hearing problems. METHODS: A 22-person working group comprising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous members from the primary healthcare, ear, hearing, and research sectors provided guidance of the project. A systematic scoping review addressed research questions relating to primary health ear health and hearing checks for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other populations at increased risk of persistent ear health problems. Twelve primary studies and eleven guidelines published between 1998 and 2020 were identified and reviewed. Quality and certainty of evidence and risk of bias ratings were completed for studies and guidelines. In the absence of certain and direct evidence, findings and draft recommendations were presented for consensus input to a 79-member expert panel using a modified e-Delphi process. Recommendations were finalised in consultation with working group members and presented to expert panel members for input on considerations relating to implementation. RESULTS: Overall, the quality, certainty, and directness of evidence in the studies and guidelines reviewed was low. However, the findings provided a basis and structure for the draft recommendations presented during the consensus-building process. After two e-Delphi rounds, seven goals and eight recommendations on the components and timing of Ear Health and Hearing Checks in primary healthcare for young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic scoping review and consensus-building process provided a pragmatic approach for producing strong recommendations within a reasonably short timeframe, despite the low quality and certainty of evidence, and paucity of studies pertaining to primary healthcare settings.

Predictive Factors for Subjective Vertigo Following Cochlear Implantation: A Regional Multicenter Cohort Study of 395 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation (CI) is generally accepted as having a low rate of postoperative complications, but between 9.3% and 13% of cases experience vertigo postoperatively. This study aimed to examine patient, surgical, and device factors contributing toward the risk of postoperative vertigo. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent cochlear implant in a regional area of New South Wales from 2007 to 2018. A total of 395 cochlear implant cases were included in the final study. RESULTS: The overall incidence of vertigo at 3 months of follow-up was 7.1% (n = 28/395). No difference was identified in this study between rates of postoperative vertigo between device factors, including implant make (Cochlear vs. Med-El), electrode shape (perimodiolar vs. straight), and electrode model. No significant difference was found also for surgical factors such as the number of electrode rings inserted, side of implantation, or surgical approach of tympanic ramp (round window insertion vs. cochleostomy).A higher percentage of patients with preoperative vertigo experienced vertigo postoperatively (18.4%, n = 7/38), compared with the population without preoperative vertigo (6.0%, n = 21/352) ( p = 0.005). Patients with previous mastoid surgery also reported a higher rate of postoperative vertigo (20%, n = 9/45) compared with those who had not had mastoid surgery (5.43%, n = 19/350) ( p = 0.006). The mean age of patients experiencing postoperative vertigo was higher than the population without postoperative symptoms (67 vs. 63). CONCLUSION: This study of a large multicenter population outlines that patient factors are more critical than surgical or device factors when considering risk factors for vertigo post-cochlear implant.