Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
West J Emerg Med ; 17(4): 454-9, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27429696

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between body mass index (BMI) and success or accuracy rate of beside ultrasound (BUS) for the diagnosis of appendicitis. METHODS: Patients four years of age and older presenting to the emergency department with suspected appendicitis were eligible. Enrollment was by convenience sampling. After informed consent, BUS was performed by trained emergency physicians who had undergone a minimum of one-hour didactic training on the use of BUS to diagnose appendicitis. We ascertained subject outcomes by a combination of medical record review and telephone follow up. Calculated BMI for adults and children were divided into four categories (underweight, normal, overweight, obese) according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classifications. RESULTS: A total of 125 subjects consented for the study, and 116 of them had adequate image data for final analysis. Seventy (60%) of the subjects were children. Prevalence of appendicitis was 39%. Fifty-two (45%) of the BUS studies were diagnostic (successful). Overall accuracy rate was 75%. Analysis by chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U test did not find any significant correlation between BMI category and BUS success. Similarly, there was no significant correlation between BMI category and BUS accuracy. The same conclusion was reached when children and adults were analyzed separately, or when subjects were dichotomized into underweight/normal and overweight/obese categories. CONCLUSION: BMI category alone is a poor predictor of appendix BUS success or accuracy.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Body Mass Index , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Ultrasonography/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Overweight , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Thinness , United States
2.
West J Emerg Med ; 15(7): 808-15, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25493122

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis is a common condition presenting to the emergency department (ED). Increasingly emergency physicians (EP) are using bedside ultrasound (BUS) as an adjunct diagnostic tool. Our objective is to investigate the test characteristics of BUS for the diagnosis of appendicitis and identify components of routine ED workup and BUS associated with the presence of appendicitis. METHODS: Patients four years of age and older presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis were eligible for enrollment. After informed consent was obtained, BUS was performed on the subjects by trained EPs who had undergone a minimum of one-hour didactic training on the use of BUS to diagnose appendicitis. They then recorded elements of clinical history, physical examination, white blood cell count (WBC) with polymophonuclear percentage (PMN), and BUS findings on a data form. We ascertained subject outcomes by a combination of medical record review and telephone follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 125 subjects consented for the study, and 116 had adequate image data for final analysis. Prevalence of appendicitis was 40%. Mean age of the subjects was 20.2 years, and 51% were male. BUS was 100% sensitive (95% CI 87-100%) and 32% specific (95% CI 14-57%) for detection of appendicitis, with a positive predictive value of 72% (95% CI 56-84%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 52-100%). Assuming all non-diagnostic studies were negative would yield a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 81%. Subjects with appendicitis had a significantly higher occurrence of anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and a higher WBC and PMN count when compared to those without appendicitis. Their BUS studies were significantly more likely to result in visualization of the appendix, appendix diameter >6mm, appendix wall thickness >2 mm, periappendiceal fluid, visualization of the appendix tip, and sonographic Mcburney's sign (p<0.05). In subjects with diagnostic BUS studies, WBC, PMN, visualization of appendix, appendix diameter >6 mm, appendix wall thickness >2 mm, periappendiceal fluid were found to be predictors of appendicitis on logistic regression. CONCLUSION: BUS is moderately useful for appendicitis diagnosis. We also identified several components in routine ED workup and BUS that are associated with appendicitis generating hypothesis for future studies.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Appendix/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Point-of-Care Systems , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Appendix/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...