Mass Spectrometry-Based Assessment of M-protein in Peripheral Blood During Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.

Mass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma-derived monoclonal proteins in peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during post-transplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of post-transplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in PB in the post-transplant setting, despite unavailability of pre-treatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in PB and paired BM MRD results at the 10-5 threshold, assessed by either next generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which in landmark analysis reached statistical significance after 18 cycles post-transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared to MRD negativity by only one modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold. Overall, post-transplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293.

Early efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma: A real-world retrospective report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The first-line obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with rituximab-based regimens. However, infusion-related reactions occur in almost half of patients during the 1st obinutuzumab administration. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab-based induction regimens in a real-world setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Outcomes of patients diagnosed with FL and treated with obinutuzumab between January 2020 and September 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: The study group included 143 treatment-naïve patients with FL. The median age was 52 years (range: 28-89 years); 45.1% of patients had a high-risk disease as assessed using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Induction chemotherapy included: O-CVP (obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in 49.0% of patients, O-CHOP (O-CVP plus doxorubicin) in 28.7% and O-BENDA (obinutuzumab, bendamustine) in 22.4%. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 69.9% and 26.5%, respectively. There was no difference in response rates between different regimens (p = 0.309). Maintenance was started in 115 patients (85.2%). In the 1st cycle, obinutuzumab was administered as a single 1000-milligram infusion in 47.9% of patients, whereas in 52.1%, initial infusions were split over 2 days (100 mg/900 mg). Infusion-related reactions were reported only during the 1st administration of obinutuzumab in 9.1% of patients, with a similar incidence in those receiving the total dose on a single day or split over 2 days (p = 0.458). The most common adverse events were hematological. Five patients died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: The early responses to induction regimens and adverse events profile were similar for every type of induction treatment. The infusion-related reactions were rare and limited to the 1st dose of obinutuzumab.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (ATLAS): interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone in this patient population. METHODS: This study is an interim analysis of ATLAS, which is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 12 academic and clinical centres in the USA and Poland. Participants were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, completed any type of induction and had stable disease or better, autologous stem-cell transplantation within 100 days, initiated induction 12 months before enrolment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 and a web-based system to receive up to 36 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (28-day cycles of carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 administered intravenously in cycle one on days 1 and 2 then 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles one to four and 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 from cycle five up to 36 [per protocol]; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or lenalidomide alone (10 mg administered orally for the first three cycles and then at the best tolerated dose [≤15 mg for 28 days in 28-day cycles]) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. After 36 cycles, patients in both treatment groups received lenalidomide maintenance. Randomisation was stratified by response to previous treatment, cytogenetic risk factors, and country. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group with no detectable minimal residual disease after cycle six (as per International Myeloma Working Group criteria) and standard-risk cytogenetics were switched to lenalidomide maintenance as of cycle nine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients). Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This unplanned interim analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 59 (61%) of the expected 96 events for the primary analysis and the results are considered preliminary. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02659293 (active, not recruiting) and EudraCT, 2015-002380-42. FINDINGS: Between June 10, 2016, and Oct 21, 2020, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n=93) or lenalidomide alone (n=87; intention-to-treat population). The median age of patients was 59·0 years (IQR 49·0-63·0); 84 (47%) patients were female and 96 (53%) were male. With a median follow-up of 33·8 months (IQR 20·9-42·9), median progression-free survival was 59·1 months (95% CI 54·8-not estimable) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group versus 41·4 months (33·2-65·4) in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·86]; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (44 [48%] in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group vs 52 [60%] in the lenalidomide group), thrombocytopenia (12 [13%] vs six [7%]), and lower respiratory tract infections (seven [8%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (30%) patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group and 19 (22%) in the lenalidomide group. One treatment-related adverse event led to death (respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group. INTERPRETATION: This interim analysis provides support for considering carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who completed any induction regimen followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation, which requires confirmation after longer follow-up of this ongoing phase 3 trial. FUNDING: Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb).

Rituximab and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma: Real-World Report of Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

INTRODUCTION: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of indolent B-cell lymphoma with a favorable prognosis in the majority of patients. The induction treatment is still based on rituximab and chemotherapy, though new anti-CD20 antibody and chemo-free regimen have been recently introduced. The aim of the study was to analyze the management, outcomes, and determinants of prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with FL in real-world experience. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients diagnosed with FL in 5 years period (2011-2015) in three oncohematological centers were reviewed. Variables were compared using Mann-Whitney or χ2 test as appropriate, survival outpoints were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients were included in the study. The median patients' age at diagnosis was 56.6 years. Low histological grade (G1-G2) was found in 62.1% of patients and advanced clinical stage in 77.0% of patients. ECOG 0 performance status was observed in 57.1% of patients. The median follow-up was 5.91 years. Initially, 31.5% of the patients were qualified to watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy, and 84.0% of the whole patients' group received systemic treatment during the observation period. As induction treatment, 53.9% and 41.4% of patients received RCVP and RCHOP regimens, respectively; 39.8% received rituximab maintenance (RM) after first-line therapy. During follow-up, transformation to aggressive lymphoma occurred in 7.2% of patients. Median overall survival (OS) was not achieved, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.28 years (95% CI; 7.35, NA), 19.6% of patients relapsed during 24 months from the start of the treatment (POD24). Median PFS for POD24 group was 1.1 years (95% CI; 0.56, 1.45) with a median OS longer than 8 years. ECOG 0, low PRIMA PI, and no POD24 were found as determinants of longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from clinical practice showed that rituximab and chemotherapy is still an effective method of FL treatment resulting in survival more than 8 years from diagnosis in most patients. RCVP protocol followed with RM is a reasonable choice for the first-line therapy especially in low/intermediate group of patients. The prognosis was significantly worse in patients with POD24. Therefore, searching for precise initial clinical and biological markers is warranted and development therapies to improve prognosis of POD24 patients.

Outcomes of treatment with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R or R-CHOP in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The standard first-line treatment for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients is rituximab-based immunochemotherapy; however, this is not due to the result of randomized clinical trials. AIMS: We retrospectively investigated 53 PMBCL patient outcomes treated either with R-CHOP-21 or DA-EPOCH-R-28. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Treatment with R-CHOP-21 resulted in a 92.0% ORR (60% CR), while DA-EPOCH-R yielded a 92.6% ORR (70.4% CR). There were no differences in the occurrence of grade 3-4 hematological adverse events, but grade 1-2 cardiologic complications (P = .003) were observed more frequently in the DA-EPOCH-R arm. Median PFS and OS were not achieved. The differences in estimated 12-month PFS in R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R group (87% vs 73.9%) and OS (100% vs 92%) were insignificant. Patients treated with R-CHOP-21 and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) had an improved OS (P = .03) but not PFS (P = .43) compared to those treated solely with R-CHOP-21. No differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients treated with R-CHOP-21/auto-HSCT and DA-EPOCH-R. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that R-CHOP-21 may be an alternative to DA-EPOCH-R treatment for PMBCL patients.