The use of local anesthesia to perform lower limb revascularization in the fragile patient with critical limb ischemia.

Patients with critical limb ischemia are usually compromised, frequently making administration of general or regional anesthesia problematic. We treated 3 fragile patients presenting contraindications to undertake traditional anesthetic techniques for lower limb revascularization, in whom local anesthesia with conscious sedation was used to complete the operation. An axillo-bifemoral, a unilateral axillo-femoral and a femoro-femoral bypass were performed. Procedure was uneventful in all three cases despite the coexistence of specific surgical challenges (distal anastomosis at the profunda in two cases, redo surgery and scarred groin in the third). Surgical revascularization under local anesthesia may be considered in selected high risk patients.

Ultrasound Guided Compression Versus Ultrasound Guided Thrombin Injection for the Treatment of Post-Catheterization Femoral Pseudoaneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare results of ultrasound based techniques (ultrasound guided compression-(UGC) versus ultrasound guided thrombin injection (UGTI)) to treat iatrogenic post-catheterization femoral pseudoaneurysms. METHODS: The study design involved a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of comparative studies. The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and OpenGray databases were searched up to October 2015. Primary outcome measure was efficacy, while other outcomes examined were safety (complication rate), duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and cost of methods. The random effects model was used to calculate combined overall effect sizes of pooled data. Data are presented as the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Two randomized control trials and 11 observational studies were included in the analysis. Overall, 786 and 318 subjects underwent UGC and UGTI respectively. The latter modality resulted in a significantly higher success rate (97.4% vs. 69.3%, OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.11) while the complication rate for both techniques was very low (0.69% vs. 0.78%, OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.40-7.88). Data regarding procedural duration and length of hospitalization were very scarce, favoring UGTI (procedural time: MD 35.53 min, 9.11-63.95, length of hospitalization MD 1.99 days, -0.31-4.29). Scarcity of data did not allow proper cost analysis, but two studies suggested that UGTI may offer reduced treatment costs. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that UGTI is superior in terms of efficacy and as safe as UGC and thus should be used as the primary modality for the treatment of post-catheterization femoral pseudoaneurysms.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with the Ovation TriVascular Stent Graft System utilizing a predominantly percutaneous approach under local anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with the Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System (TriVascular Inc., Santa Rosa, CA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and compare results according to the type of anaesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study including patients who underwent EVAR using the Ovation endograft between May 2011 and July 2014. Outcome was evaluated regarding pre-, peri- and immediate postoperative and follow-up measures. Overall results are reported, while additional analysis was performed to compare the outcome between groups of patients undertaking either local or regional/general anaesthesia (LA vs RGA). RESULTS: 66 patients were included. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 1-39 months). Median age was 72 years and median abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was 58 mm (range, 54-100 mm). Technical success was 63 (95%), while there were 2 (3%) conversions to open surgery. A total percutaneous approach was used in 50/66 (76%) cases. Overall, 9/66 (14%) subjects suffered from any kind of morbidity. Median hospitalization was 3 days (range, 1-16 days). Immediate and midterm mortality rate was 0%. No endoleak Type I, III, IV or stent migration was observed. There were 8 (13%) Type II endoleaks. Overall, additional endovascular procedures were required in 6 (9%), while surgery was performed in 4 (6%) patients. 44 (67%) patients underwent LA and 22 (23%) RGA. Differences between groups were significant for procedural time (85 vs 107 min; p < 0.001), percutaneous access (91% vs 45%; p < 0.001) and systematic complications (2.3% vs 14%; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: EVAR with the use of the Ovation endograft shows promising short-term and midterm results regarding safety and effectiveness. Completion of the procedures under LA using a total percutaneous approach seems advantageous and may be used in routine practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System is an ultra-low profile stent graft system that allows percutaneous deployment for EVAR and offers excellent overall efficacy and safety. Totally percutaneous EVAR under LA seems advantageous and may be used as a routine with this specific endograft.

Focal aorto-iliac atherosclerosis amenable to endovascular interventions though considered benign carry a significant risk of cardiovascular mortality: clinical investigation.

AIM: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) manifested as claudication is surprisingly stable regarding limb deterioration but may indicate increased risk for cardiovascular events and death. We examined whether focal atherosclerotic iliac lesions (TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus for The Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease-TASC II Type A,B) undergoing endovascular procedures indicate a high risk for limb and life and what is the effect of atherosclerotic risk factors in the rate of adverse outcomes. METHODS: We examined patients undergoing iliac endovascular interventions due to TASC II Type A,B lesions causing disabling claudication during a 10-year period. Outcome in terms of limb condition and total mortality during short and long-term follow-up was evaluated. RESULTS: One-hundred thirty-nine patients and one-hundred seventy limbs were examined. Median follow-up was 4.3 years. There were 100 (58.8%) limbs with Type A and 70 (41.2%) with Type B lesions. Primary patency was 81.2% and secondary patency 92.4%. One-hundred fifteen (67.6%) limbs were improved whereas 42 (24.7%) remained stable and 13 (7.7%) deteriorated during long-term follow-up. Major amputation was performed in 2 and minor amputation in 2 limbs resulting in 2.4% total amputation rate. Overall mortality was 22.6% and 64.5% of all deaths represented cardiovascular events. Statistical analysis revealed significant relations of total mortality with hyperlipidemia and diabetes. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of localized iliac lesions offers good long-term results regarding patency, clinical improvement and limb salvage. Nevertheless, even focal atherosclerosis indicates a significant risk of cardiovascular mortality. Modification of atherosclerotic risk factors early in the course of PAD may be beneficial for these patients.

Efficacy of preoperative computed tomography imaging to reduce negative appendectomies in patients undergoing surgery for left lower quadrant abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of acute appendicitis can be challenging due to atypical presentation. Computed-tomography can reduce negative appendectomies but not without adverse effects. We report our experience with preoperative CT-scan in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 3-years, 257 adult patients underwent appendectomy. We retrospectively reviewed clinical information, CT-scans, histological data. Patients were divided in four groups: Group I: low clinical probability without CT-scan; Group II: low clinical probability with CT-scan; Group III: high clinical probability without CT-scan; Group IV: high clinical probability with CT-scan. Negative appendectomies were determined from histological examination. Negative appendectomy rate was compared between groups of the same clinical probability differing on whether a pre-operative CT scan was performed or not (Group I vs II, Group III vs IV). RESULTS: Groups I,II,III,IV included 12.4%, 18.2%, 54.5% and 14.8% of patients, respectively. The corresponding negative appendectomy rates were 18.7%, 4.3%, 4.2% and 2.6%. Odds ratio of negative appendectomy for patients without CT-scan was 5.2 (95% CI: 1.2-27.7) when there was low clinical probability and 1.6 (95% CI: 0.2-14.2) for high clinical probability. CONCLUSION: Patients with low clinical probability of acute appendicitis benefit the most from preoperative CT while this does not apply to patients with high clinical probability.

Diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries can be challenging in multitrauma patients with associated injuries. Our experience and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is the most common cause of death and disability among patients during the first four decades of life. Abdominal trauma is reported to be the 3rd most common injured region. Clinical examination may be unreliable in the evaluation of these patients especially in the presence of associated injuries. Therefore the use of diagnostic tools is essential in the management of the injured patient with abdominal trauma and additional injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 1 year period from December 2010 to November 2011 we recorded the patients that presented to the emergency department of our hospital and were found to suffer from intra-abdominal injuries. These patients were divided in two groups depending on whether they had additional comorbid injuries or not. Several parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups, such as mechanism of injury, general status and hemodynamic stability of the patient on presentation, physical examination, use of imaging modalities and concomitant findings, need for surgical intervention and mortality rates. Furthermore the discrepancy between physical findings and final diagnosis after the use of diagnostic adjuncts is reported. RESULTS: We recorded 31 patients with abdominal trauma. 13 (42%) patients were found to suffer from abdominal trauma and associated injuries (Group I), whereas 18 (58%) presented with abdominal trauma alone (Group II). The patients of the first group presented hemodynamic instability in 38% of cases while the patients of the second in 22% of cases. Reduced consciousness was present in 38% in group I versus 17% in group II. Signs of abdominal injury during clinical examination were present in only 15% in group I versus 72% in group II that represented a remarkable difference between the two groups. Conservative treatment was possible in 15% of patients with additional injuries and in 22% of patients with abdominal injury alone. In group I there were two deaths whereas in group II all patients survived. CONCLUSION: In patients with abdominal trauma, associated injuries seem to add to the severity of injury and indicate a worse prognosis. Clinical examination is unreliable and misleading in the majority of these patients and the use of diagnostic tools cannot be overemphasized.

Colon bleeding from both arteriovenous malformation and inflammatory bowel disease. Case report.

INTRODUCTION: Although endoscopy and angiography have changed the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and the majority of patients respond to conservative treatment 10-20% of cases have no recognizable site of hemorrhage. About 10-30% of all patients will require operative intervation. A very rare case of massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a young patient who was found to suffer from two causes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the same time is reported. The patient had to undergo surgery for the control of bleeding. CASE REPORT: A 23 years old male Greek patient presented to the emergency department of our hospital because of three episodes of hematochezia during the last 10 hours. He was admitted to the surgical department for monitoring of his condition. In the next 10 hours the hematochezia continued and the patient although being transfused with three units of packed red blood cells, started to become unstable with his vital signs affected, having also a syncoptic episode. Emergent colonoscopy could not recognize the site of hemorrhage or any other pathology in the colon, but revealed an intestinal lumen full of blood from the anus to the cecum. It was decided that the patient should undergo operation to stop bleeding. An extensive right hemicolectomy was performed. After that the patient remained stable and showed no signs of hemorrage. The histopathological examination of the specimen showed an arteriovenous malformation but also lesions of the mucosa compatible with early inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: In young patients with massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin, extensive right hemicolectomy provides a good and safe therapeutic choice that will control hemorrhage in most cases with the advantage of lower mortality and morbidity rates compared to subtotal colectomy. Close monitoring of the patient postoperatively is essential.