Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 208: 114204, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sotorasib 960 mg once daily is approved to treat KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sotorasib exhibits non-dose proportional pharmacokinetics and clinical responses at lower doses; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sotorasib 960 mg and 240 mg. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, open-label study, adults with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC received sotorasib 960 mg or 240 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetics. The study was not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing. RESULTS: In the 960 mg group (n = 104), ORR was 32.7 % and DCR was 86.5 %. In the 240 mg group (n = 105), ORR was 24.8 % and DCR was 81.9 %. Median PFS was 5.4 months (960 mg) and 5.6 months (240 mg). At a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (960 mg) and 11.7 months (240 mg). AUC0-24 h and Cmax were 1.3-fold numerically higher with the 960 mg dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥10 %) for 960 mg and 240 mg doses, respectively, were diarrhea (39.4 %; 31.7 %), nausea (23.1 %; 19.2 %), increased alanine aminotransaminase (14.4 %; 17.3 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (13.5 %; 13.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with sotorasib 960 mg once daily had numerically higher ORR and DCR, and longer DOR and OS, than patients treated with 240 mg in this descriptive analysis. TEAEs were manageable with label-directed dose modifications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03600883.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Male , Female , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Aged , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Administration Schedule , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Piperazines , Pyrimidines
3.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 69(12): e29999, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36215217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer diagnosed in childhood. Survival for patients following relapse remains poor, and achieving complete remission (CR) after relapse is the first critical step to cure. Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor with an acceptable safety profile and clinical activity in adults with multiple myeloma but has not been assessed in children. The primary objective of this phase 1b study was to assess the safety and tolerability of carfilzomib combined with vincristine, dexamethasone, asparaginase, and daunorubicin (VXLD) in children with relapsed and/or refractory ALL. METHODS: Patients aged 1-21 years (n = 24) received 4-week induction therapy with carfilzomib at dose levels of 27 mg/m2 (n = 3), 36 mg/m2 (n = 7), 45 mg/m2 (n = 4), and 56 mg/m2 (n = 10) in combination with VXLD. Patients achieving stable disease were offered further consolidation chemotherapy. Analyses were based on the safety evaluable population. RESULTS: Following dose escalation of carfilzomib, the recommended phase 2 carfilzomib dose was identified as 56 mg/m2 . Grade ≥3 hematological adverse events were common (83%, 20/24 patients), and serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 58% (14/24) of patients. At the end of induction, CR/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was identified in 50% of patients (n = 12/24). By the end of consolidation, cumulative CR/CRp/CRi was identified in 58% of patients (n = 14/24). CONCLUSION: These data support the use of carfilzomib in pediatric patients with relapsed and/or refractory ALL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Induction Chemotherapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Child , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Recurrence , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult
4.
Acta Haematol ; 145(6): 592-602, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790143

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) molecule, was evaluated in an expansion cohort of the phase 1b/2 study (NCT02412306) in Japanese adult (n = 14) and pediatric (n = 17) patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia-negative B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Globally recommended blinatumomab doses were administered to adult (9-28 µg/day) and pediatric (5-15 µg/m2/day) patients. Primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-related AEs. RESULTS: All adult and pediatric patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Grade ≥3 TEAEs were observed in 11 (79%) adult and 15 (88%) pediatric patients. Blinatumomab was discontinued in 1 (6%) pediatric patient due to treatment-related grade 4 cytokine release syndrome. Fatal AEs such as disease progression and multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome, which were not treatment-related, were reported in 2 (12%) pediatric patients. Eleven (79%) adults achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh) within the first two blinatumomab cycles. Nine of 10 adult patients with CR/CRh and evaluable minimal residual disease (MRD) achieved MRD response. CR/CRh was achieved by 5 (29%) pediatric patients, of which two had MRD response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, blinatumomab was safe and efficacious in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory BCP ALL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Child , Humans , Acute Disease , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Japan , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
5.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 63(9): 2063-2073, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503708

ABSTRACT

This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of blinatumomab consolidation therapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; International Prognostic Index 3-5 and/or double-/triple-hit or double MYC/BCL-2 expressors) who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) following run-in with 6 cycles of R-chemotherapy (NCT03023878). Of the 47 patients enrolled, 28 received blinatumomab. Five patients (17.9%) experienced grade 4 treatment-emergent adverse events of interest (neutropenia, n = 4; infection, n = 1). Two deaths reported at the end of the study were unrelated to treatment with blinatumomab (disease progression, n = 1; infection, n = 1). 3/4 patients with PR and 4/4 patients with SD after R-chemotherapy achieved CR following blinatumomab. Consolidation with blinatumomab in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk DLBCL who did not progress under R-chemotherapy was better tolerated than in previous studies where blinatumomab was used for treatment of patients with lymphoma.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Adult , Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 , Remission Induction
6.
Blood Adv ; 6(3): 1004-1014, 2022 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979020

ABSTRACT

The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific molecule, were examined in an open-label, single-arm, expanded access study (RIALTO). Children (>28 days and <18 years) with CD19+ relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) received up to 5 cycles of blinatumomab by continuous infusion (cycle: 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary end point was incidence of adverse events. Secondary end points included complete response (CR) and measurable residual disease (MRD) response within the first 2 cycles and relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) after treatment. At final data cutoff (10 January 2020), 110 patients were enrolled (median age, 8.5 years; 88% had ≥5% baseline blasts). A low incidence of grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome (n = 2; 1.8%) and neurologic events (n = 4; 3.6%) was reported; no blinatumomab-related fatal adverse events were recorded. The probability of response was not affected by the presence of cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. Median OS was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.0-not estimable) and was significantly better for MRD responders vs MRD nonresponders (not estimable vs 9.3; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.39). Of patients achieving CR after 2 cycles, 73.5% (95% CI: 61.4%-83.5%) proceeded to alloHSCT. One-year OS probability was higher for patients who received alloHSCT vs without alloHSCT after blinatumomab (87% vs 29%). These findings support the use of blinatumomab as a safe and efficacious treatment of pediatric R/R B-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02187354.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Antigens, CD19 , CD3 Complex , Child , Humans , Neoplasm, Residual
7.
JAMA ; 325(9): 843-854, 2021 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651091

ABSTRACT

Importance: Blinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule with efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Objective: To evaluate event-free survival in children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL after a third consolidation course with blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, patients were enrolled November 2015 to July 2019 (data cutoff, July 17, 2019). Investigators at 47 centers in 13 countries enrolled children older than 28 days and younger than 18 years with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL in morphologic complete remission (M1 marrow, <5% blasts) or with M2 marrow (blasts ≥5% and <25%) at randomization. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive 1 cycle of blinatumomab (n = 54; 15 µg/m2/d for 4 weeks, continuous intravenous infusion) or chemotherapy (n = 54) for the third consolidation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was event-free survival (events: relapse, death, second malignancy, or failure to achieve complete remission). The key secondary efficacy end point was overall survival. Other secondary end points included minimal residual disease remission and incidence of adverse events. Results: A total of 108 patients were randomized (median age, 5.0 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.0-10.5]; 51.9% girls; 97.2% M1 marrow) and all patients were included in the analysis. Enrollment was terminated early for benefit of blinatumomab in accordance with a prespecified stopping rule. After a median of 22.4 months of follow-up (IQR, 8.1-34.2), the incidence of events in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy groups was 31% vs 57% (log-rank P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18-0.61]). Deaths occurred in 8 patients (14.8%) in the blinatumomab group and 16 (29.6%) in the consolidation chemotherapy group. The overall survival HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.18-1.01). Minimal residual disease remission was observed in more patients in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group (90% [44/49] vs 54% [26/48]; difference, 35.6% [95% CI, 15.6%-52.5%]). No fatal adverse events were reported. In the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group, the incidence of serious adverse events was 24.1% vs 43.1%, respectively, and the incidence of adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 was 57.4% vs 82.4%. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 2 patients in the blinatumomab group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL, treatment with 1 cycle of blinatumomab compared with standard intensive multidrug chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant resulted in an improved event-free survival at a median of 22.4 months of follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02393859.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Immunotherapy , Leukemia, B-Cell/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy , Consolidation Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, B-Cell/mortality , Male , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
8.
Drug Saf ; 42(5): 587-601, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30565020

ABSTRACT

Blinatumomab is the first-and-only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cluster of differentiation (CD) 19-directed CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) immunotherapy. It is currently FDA approved for the treatment of adults and children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) and Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and B-cell precursor ALL with minimal residual disease. Similarly, initial marketing authorization for blinatumomab in the European Union was granted for the treatment of adults with Ph- R/R B-cell precursor ALL. The benefits of treating R/R B-cell precursor ALL patients with blinatumomab include increased overall survival, more favorable hematologic remission and molecular response rates, and a lower incidence rate of selected adverse events when compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy. The key risks associated with blinatumomab treatment include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and medication errors. Here, we review the benefits and risks of blinatumomab treatment and describe how these risks can be mitigated.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Risk Assessment
9.
Blood Adv ; 2(13): 1522-1531, 2018 07 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29954814

ABSTRACT

In the phase 3 TOWER study, blinatumomab demonstrated an overall survival benefit over standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Nearly all patients in both treatment arms experienced an adverse event (AE), and the incidence rate of serious AEs was higher for blinatumomab. However, as treatment exposure differed between the 2 arms, we conducted an exploratory safety analysis comparing exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of blinatumomab vs SOC. Analyses were conducted for all patients who received therapy (safety population). Patients received a median (range) of 2 cycles (1-9) of blinatumomab (N = 267) vs 1 cycle (1-4) of SOC (N = 109). Grade ≥3 AE rates were generally higher in cycle 1 of blinatumomab than in cycle 2 (76% vs 37%). After adjusting for time on treatment, EAERs of grade ≥3 were significantly lower for blinatumomab vs SOC overall (10.73 vs 45.27 events per patient-year; P < .001) and for events of clinical interest, including infections (1.63 vs 6.49 events per patient-year; P < .001), cytopenias (3.64 vs 20.07 events per patient-year; P < .001), and neurologic events (0.38 vs 0.95 events per patient-year; P = .008). The EAER of grade ≥3 cytokine-release syndrome was higher for blinatumomab than for SOC (0.16 vs 0 events per patient-year; P = .038). These data further support the role of blinatumomab as an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with r/r Ph- ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02013167.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Bispecific/administration & dosage , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infections , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases , Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications , Salvage Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Epilepsia ; 50(5): 1158-66, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19170737

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluated safety and efficacy of clobazam (CLB) as adjunctive therapy for drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with LGS aged 2-26 years were administered CLB (low dose = target 0.25 mg/kg/day; high dose = target 1.0 mg/kg/day). The study consisted of 4-week baseline, 3-week titration, and 4-week maintenance periods, followed by a 3-week taper or continuation in an open-label study. Seizure frequency was recorded in a diary by the parent/caregiver throughout the study. RESULTS: Weekly drop seizure rates were significantly reduced from baseline in both the high-dose and low-dose groups; the reduction was significantly greater in the high-dose group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the high-dose group experienced reductions in drop seizures of >or=25%, >or=50%, and >or=75% compared to the low-dose group; more patients in the high-dose group experienced a 100% reduction, but the difference was not significant. Nondrop seizures were also reduced in a dose-dependent manner. In both investigator and parent/caregiver global evaluations, patients in the high-dose group showed significantly greater improvements in overall symptoms compared to low-dose CLB. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate, and were similar between dose groups. Five serious adverse events were reported in four patients, but in no case was CLB discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Clobazam was well tolerated and reduced drop seizure rates; high-dose CLB was more effective than low-dose CLB. Other seizure types were also reduced.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Developmental Disabilities/drug therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Clobazam , Developmental Disabilities/complications , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electroencephalography/methods , Epilepsy/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL