A genetic association study of heart failure: more evidence for the role of BAG3 in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Few investigations have been conducted to identify genetic determinants of common, polygenetic forms of heart failure (HF), and only a limited number of these genetic associations have been validated by multiple groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a case-control study to further investigate the potential impact of 14 previously reported candidate genes on the risk of HF and specific HF sub-types. We also performed an exploratory genome-wide study. We included 799 patients with HF and 1529 controls. After adjusting for age, sex, and genetic ancestry, we found that the C allele of rs2234962 in BAG3 was associated with a decreased risk of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.68, P = 0.0005), consistent with a previous report. No association for the other primary variants or exploratory genome-wide study was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide independent replication for the association between a common coding variant (rs2234962) in BAG3 and the risk of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Is there a potential association between spironolactone and the risk of new-onset diabetes in a cohort of older patients with heart failure?

PURPOSE: Some evidence suggests that spironolactone may have a deleterious effect on glucose homeostasis. The objective of this study was to assess whether spironolactone use is associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes in a large cohort of patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: Two Quebec government administrative databases were used to identify a cohort of hospitalized patients discharged between January 1995 and December 2009 with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF and without secondary discharge diagnosis of diabetes. Patients were categorized as new users of spironolactone and non-users. The primary outcome was defined as new-onset diabetes (NOD) during 5 years of follow-up and was ascertained using ICD codes for diabetes or use of hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: Among the 2974 patients that were included in the cohort analysis, 769 were given a new prescription of spironolactone. The incidence rate of NOD was similar among spironolactone users (5.0 per 100 person-years) and non-users (4.9 per 100 person-years). There was no significant association between the use of spironolactone and NOD in the crude, unadjusted model (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.28; p = 0.9217), and it remained unchanged in the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model (HR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.72-1.18; p = 0.5227). The results were consistent with those observed in sensitivity analyses of a 1:3 propensity score-matched cohort (HR = 0.97; CI = 0.76-1.25; p = 0.8169). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence supporting the claim that use of spironolactone is associated with a higher risk of diabetes among patients hospitalized for HF.

A comparison of the effects of selective and non-selective mineralocorticoid antagonism on glucose homeostasis of heart failure patients with glucose intolerance or type II diabetes: A randomized controlled double-blind trial.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, spironolactone, a non-selective MRA, has been shown to exert a harmful effect on glucose homeostasis. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was to compare the effects of spironolactone to those of the selective MRA eplerenone on glucose homeostasis among 62 HF patients with glucose intolerance or type II diabetes. Trial registration number:NCT01586442.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on glucose homeostasis.

BACKGROUND: Spironolactone, a nonselective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), may have a deleterious effect on glycemia. The objective of this review was to assess current knowledge on MRAs' influence (spironolactone, eplerenone, and canrenone) on glucose homeostasis and the risk of diabetes. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using the Medline database on articles published from 1946 to January 2017 that studied the effects of MRAs on any glucose-related endpoints, without any restrictions regarding the participants' characteristics.Study design, patient population, dose and duration of intervention, and the quantitative results on glycemic markers were extracted, interpreted for result synthesis, and evaluated for sources of bias. From the articles included in the qualitative analysis, a select number were used in a meta-analysis on studies having measured glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or risk of diabetes. RESULTS: Seventy-two articles were selected from the Medline database and references of articles. Results on spironolactone were heterogeneous, but seemed to be disease-specific. A potential negative effect on glucose regulation was mainly observed in heart failure and diabetes trials, while a neutral or positive effect was detected in diseases characterized by hyperandrogenism, and inconclusive for hypertension. Interpretation of data from heart failure trials was limited by the small number of studies. From a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled studies evaluating spironolactone's impact on HbA1c in diabetic patients, spironolactone had a nonsignificant effect in parallel-group studies (mean difference 0.03 [-0.20;0.26]), but significantly increased HbA1c in crossover studies (mean difference 0.24 [0.18;0.31]). Finally, eplerenone did not seem to influence glycemia, while limited data indicated that canrenone may exert a neutral or beneficial effect.The studies had important limitations regarding study design, sample size, duration of follow-up, and choice of glycemic markers. CONCLUSION: Spironolactone may induce disease-specific and modest alterations on glycemia. It is uncertain whether these effects are transient or not. Data from the most extensively studied population, individuals with diabetes, do not support a long-term glycemic impact in these patients. Further prospective studies are necessary to establish spironolactone's true biological effects and their clinical implications.

Disclosure of individual pharmacogenomic results in research projects: when and what kind of information to return to research participants.

In the growing field of genomics, the utility of returning certain research results to participants has become a highly debated issue. Existing guidelines are not explicit as to the kind of genomic information that should be returned to research participants. Moreover, very few current recommendations and articles in the literature address the return of pharmacogenomic results. Although genetics and pharmacogenomics have many similarities, the circumstances in which disclosure could have a benefit for the participants are different. This review aims to describe the conditions in which disclosure of pharmacogenomic results is appropriate.