Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 129(5): 691-3, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10844077

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a case of an isolated tarsal fibroma. METHODS: Case report. Excisional biopsy and histopathological evaluation were performed on a solid lesion originating from the tarsal conjunctival surface of an upper eyelid. RESULTS: Histopathological evaluation, including positive trichrome stains, was consistent with fibroma of the left upper tarsus. No recurrence has developed after a follow-up interval of a year. CONCLUSION: Tarsal fibroma is a rare condition that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of tarsal lesions.


Subject(s)
Conjunctival Neoplasms/pathology , Eyelid Neoplasms/pathology , Fibroma/pathology , Aged , Conjunctival Neoplasms/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Eyelid Neoplasms/surgery , Fibroma/surgery , Humans , Male
2.
Ophthalmology ; 102(10): 1542-8; discussion 1548-9, 1995 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9097804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of hydroxyapatite (HA) as an orbital implant with evisceration. BACKGROUND: Although several reports have documented good success with HA orbital implants and their use with enucleation, only a few reports mention HA with evisceration. These few reports are less favorable, with exposure rates as high as 67%. In contrast, the authors have had good success with evisceration and HA implants with no major complications and a low exposure rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all eviscerations with HA implant performed between January 1989 and July 1993 was completed (n = 31). Patients underwent evisceration with scleral modification, including anterior relaxing incisions and posterior sclerotomies to accommodate a large sphere without tension on the wound. Patient records were reviewed for demographic data, surgical indication, sphere size, clinical outcome, complications, and follow-up interval. The surgical technique is described. RESULTS: All 31 patients underwent successful surgery with complications limited to exposure (6%), mild superior sulcus deficit (6%), and a conjunctival cyst (3%). No patient required further socket reconstruction, and no patient required peg placement to enhance motility. The average follow-up interval was 13.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have had good success using HA orbital implants for evisceration without major complications. Primary evisceration with HA implantation after posterior sclerotomies is a safe and effective method for treating patients with a blind, painful eye.


Subject(s)
Durapatite , Eye Evisceration/methods , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Prostheses and Implants , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biocompatible Materials , Blindness/surgery , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL