Study Protocol of a Prospective, Monocentric, Single-Arm Study Investigating the Correlation of Endograft Properties with Aortic Stiffness in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients Subjected to Endovascular Aortic Repair.

The number of endovascular aortic repairs (EVARs) has surpassed the number of open surgical repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) worldwide. The available commercial endoprostheses are composed of materials that are stiffer than the native aortic wall. As a consequence, the implantation of stent-graft endoprostheses during EVAR increases aortic rigidity and thus aortic stiffness, resulting in a decrease in abdominal aorta compliance. EVAR has been found to have a possibly harmful effect not only on heart functions but also on other vascular beds, including kidney function, due to the decrease in aortic compliance that it causes. Aortic stiffness is measured by various hemodynamic indices like the pulse wave velocity (PWV), the central aortic pressure (CAP), and the augmentation index (AIx). In the literature, there are increasing numbers of studies investigating the properties of endografts, which are strongly related to increases in aortic stiffness. However, there is a lack of data on whether there is a correlation between the length of various endografts implanted during EVAR and the increase in the PWV, CAP, and AIx postoperatively compared to the preoperative values. The aim of this prospective, observational, monocentric, single-arm study is to investigate the correlation between endograft length and the postoperative increase in the PWV, CAP, and AIx in patients subjected to EVAR. Additionally, this study intends to identify other endograft properties related to increases in the PWV, CAP, and AIx. Other endpoints to be studied are the existence of immediate postoperative myocardial and kidney injury after EVAR. The prediction of cardiovascular events caused by endograft-related increased aortic stiffness could contribute to the improvement of various endograft properties so that the impact of endografts on the native aortic wall can be minimized.

Assessment and Management of Patients with Obesity and Hypertension in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres. A survey from the ESH Working Group on Diabetes and Metabolic Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers are faced with an increasing number of patients with obesity and arterial hypertension. Preventing obesity-associated hypertension and appropriately managing patients with established disease are both important. Hence, the aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical care of patients with obesity and hypertension among ESH Excellence Centres (ECs). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, international 30-item survey through e-mails. RESULTS: In total, 70 representatives of ECs participated (78% men) with 66% of them practicing medicine for more than 30 years and working in well-equipped clinics. Most were internists (41%) and cardiologists (37%) and 73% reported training on the management of obese patients with hypertension. A majority weigh their patients (77%) and evaluate patients for sleep disorders (93%). However, only 47% spend more than 5min to advise for lifestyle modification in general, 59% for weight loss, 56% for salt intake and 64% for exercise. Finally, a minority of participants ask patients if they like their body (6%) or about previous attempts to lose weight (28%), evaluate 24h urinary sodium excretion rate (22%) and provide written (15%) or personalized (10%) dietary advices. If the patient suffers also from type 2 diabetes mellitus, 66% switch treatment to GLP1 receptor agonists and 60% to SGLT2 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Most clinicians in ESH ECs are well educated regarding obesity-associated hypertension, and clinics are sufficiently equipped to manage these patients, as well. However, several deficits were reported regarding efforts to address and implement obesity specific aspects and interventions to improve care in patients with obesity and hypertension.

Hypertension and obesity still remain two of the main cardiovascular risk factors worldwide.There is a need to lower the incidence of obesity-induced hypertension, and to focus on practical guidelines for the evaluation and management of patients with obesity and hypertension.This is a web-based survey to understand the current clinical practices in assessing/managing patients with obesity and hypertension in ESH Excellence Centres.Most clinicians in ESH ECs are well educated regarding obesity-associated hypertension.Clinics are sufficiently equipped to manage these patients.Several deficits were reported regarding efforts to address and implement obesity specific aspects and interventions to improve care in patients with obesity and hypertension.

Obesity and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: An analysis from HELLAS-FH registry.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and obesity are well-established risk factors of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite high prevalence, their joint association with ASCVD remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of obesity with prevalent ASCVD in individuals with heterozygous FH (HeFH) enrolled in the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH). METHODS: FH diagnosis was based on Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. Adults with at least possible FH diagnosis (DLCN score ≥3) and available body mass index (BMI) values were included. Homozygous FH individuals were excluded. RESULTS: 1655 HeFH adults (mean age 51.0 ± 14.4 years, 48.6% female) were included; 378 (22.8%) and 430 (26.0%) were diagnosed with probable and definite FH, respectively. Furthermore, 371 participants (22.4%) had obesity and 761 (46.0%) were overweight. Prevalence of ASCVD risk factors increased progressively with BMI. Prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) was 23.4% (3.2% for stroke and 2.7% for peripheral artery disease, PAD), and increased progressively across BMI groups. After adjusting for traditional ASCVD risk factors and lipid-lowering medication, individuals with obesity had higher odds of established CAD (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.04-2.27, p = 0.036) as well as premature CAD (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.17-2.60, p = 0.009) compared with those with normal BMI. No association was found with stroke or PAD. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of adults with HeFH have overweight or obesity. Obesity was independently associated with increased prevalence of CAD in this population.

The Depiction of Hypertension in Heart Imaging Examinations: An Up-to-Date Review of the Evidence.

Hypertension is one of the main preventable cardiovascular (CV) risk factors all over the years, closely related to CV morbidity and mortality. One of the most common hypertensive target organ damages is hypertensive heart disease (HHD), including left ventricular hypertrophy, which progresses gradually and leads to systolic or diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricular, and finally to end-stage heart failure. Regarding its prevalence and the need for early diagnosis, assessment of heart imaging examination is of major importance. Echocardiography has been used as the standard imaging technique to evaluate HHD for years, providing an accurate evaluation of the left ventricular geometry, along with the systolic and diastolic function. However, nowadays there is a growing interest in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Despite the importance of the use of echocardiography in everyday clinical practice, numerous studies have shown the superiority of CMR as an imaging technique for clinical and research purposes, mainly due to its strength to provide an unlimited area of view, as well as the identification and quantification of the type and extent of myocardial fibrosis. Hence, this review aims to analyze the importance of heart imaging in the hypertensive population, with a special interest in CMR imaging.

The Modern Environment: The New Secondary Cause of Hypertension?

The most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide, is hypertension. Although most cases of hypertension are thought to be essential, the multifactorial associations of the environmental influence on blood pressure seem to play an important role and should be more closely investigated. This review attempts to focus on the recent literature that examines the environmental effects on arterial blood pressure and its management. Seasonal variability and the role of ambient temperature, either occupational or recreational noise pollution, as well as obesity due to environment-caused dietary habits, are recognized as important risk factors, affecting the onset as well as the regulation of hypertension. Furthermore, the effects of seasonal fluctuations in blood pressure, noise pollution, and obesity seem to share a similar pathogenesis, and as such to all further react together, leading to increased blood pressure. The activation of the autonomous nervous system plays a key role and causes an increase in stress hormones that generates oxidative stress on the vascular system and, thus, vasoconstriction. In this review, by focusing on the association of the environmental impact with arterial blood pressure, we come to the question of whether most cases of hypertension-if not all-should, indeed, be considered primary or secondary.

The Importance of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement, as Highlighted by the Correlation with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in an Untreated Hypertensive Population.

Background and Objectives: Hypertensive heart disease, especially left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), is considered to be one of the main types hypertension-mediated organ damage. Hence, the purpose of this study was to examine which method of measuring BP (office BP measurement (OBPM), 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), or home BP monitoring (HBPM)), can be better correlated with echocardiographic LVH in the untreated hypertensive population. Materials and Methods: This study's population consisted of 202 patients 58 ± 15 years old (40.8% males). All patients reported elevated home BP measurements for at least 3 months, but they had never been treated before for hypertension. Office and out-of-office BP measurements, including ABPM on a usual working day and seven-day HBPM, as well as 2D echocardiography, were performed. Results: In the univariate analysis, LVH was associated (p < 0.05) with a mean 24 h systolic BP (OR: 1.93, CI: 1.29-2.91), a mean 24 h diastolic BP (OR: 1.30, CI: 1.16-1.80), ambulatory daytime systolic (OR: 1.11, CI:1.01-1.82) and diastolic BP (OR: 1.13, CI:1.09-1.17), ambulatory nighttime systolic BP (OR: 2.11, CI: 1.04-4.31), and mean home systolic BP (OR: 1.05, CI:1.01-1.12). Pearson's correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the LV mass index and the mean 24 h systolic BP (r = 0.58, p < 0.05), daytime systolic BP (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.57, p < 0.05). Most of the population with confirmed LVH presented confirmed hypertension (based on ABPM, 48.1% or HBPM, 40%). The second most dominant phenotype was masked hypertension (ABPM, 32.7% and HBPM, 23.7%). The majority (59.3%) had non-dipping status, 20.4% had a reverse dipping pattern, 13% had a dipping pattern, and only 7.3% had extreme dipping BP. Conclusions: Out-of-office BP measurement devices seemed to be superior compared to in-office. This advantage is highlighted by better correlations in the identification of LVH as well as the diagnosis of masked hypertension, a condition also highly correlated with LVH.

Prevalence of masked hypertension and its association with left ventricular hypertrophy in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to assess blood pressure (BP) status in young patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis or after kidney transplantation. The aim of this meta-analysis is to estimate the prevalence of both white-coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension, along with the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), in children and young adults with CKD on dialysis or after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the prevalence of BP phenotypes using ABPM, in children and young adults with CKD stages 2-5d. Records were identified by search in databases (Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL) and sources of grey literature, until 31 December 2021. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions (double arcsine transformation) was conducted. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the systematic review, reporting data from 1140 individuals (children and young adults with CKD with a mean age of 13.79 ±â€Š4.35 years). Masked hypertension and WCH were diagnosed in 301 and 76 patients, respectively. It was estimated an overall pooled masked hypertension prevalence of 27% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18-36, I2  = 87%] and an overall pooled WCH prevalence of 6% (95% CI 3-9, I2  = 78%). Among kidney transplant recipients, masked hypertension had a prevalence of 29% (95% CI 14-47, I2  = 86%). The prevalence of LVH was found 28% (95% CI 0.19-0.39) in a total of 238 CKD patients with ambulatory hypertension. In 172 CKD patients with masked hypertension, LVH was present in 49, with the estimated prevalence being 23% (95% CI 0.15-0.32). CONCLUSION: Masked hypertension has a significant prevalence in children and young adults with CKD. Masked hypertension carries an adverse prognosis, with an increased risk of LVH, warranting clinical attention when assessing cardiovascular risk in this population. Therefore, ABPM and echocardiography is of high importance when assessing BP status in children with CKD. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UKXAF.

Blood pressure variability: methodological aspects, clinical relevance and practical indications for management - a European Society of Hypertension position paper ∗.

Blood pressure is not a static parameter, but rather undergoes continuous fluctuations over time, as a result of the interaction between environmental and behavioural factors on one side and intrinsic cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms on the other side. Increased blood pressure variability (BPV) may indicate an impaired cardiovascular regulation and may represent a cardiovascular risk factor itself, having been associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and dementia incidence. Nonetheless, BPV was considered only a research issue in previous hypertension management guidelines, because the available evidence on its clinical relevance presents several gaps and is based on heterogeneous studies with limited standardization of methods for BPV assessment. The aim of this position paper, with contributions from members of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability and from a number of international experts, is to summarize the available evidence in the field of BPV assessment methodology and clinical applications and to provide practical indications on how to measure and interpret BPV in research and clinical settings based on currently available data. Pending issues and clinical and methodological recommendations supported by available evidence are also reported. The information provided by this paper should contribute to a better standardization of future studies on BPV, but should also provide clinicians with some indications on how BPV can be managed based on currently available data.

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥20 mmHg when going from the supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" if this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and the identification of patients that are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥ 20 mmHg when going from supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" for when this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and identification of patients who are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Preterm Birth, Kidney Function and Cardiovascular Disease in Children and Adolescents.

Over recent decades, there has been a global increase in preterm birth rate, which constitutes about 11% of total births worldwide. The present review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the long-term consequences of prematurity on renal and cardiovascular development and function. Recent literature supports that prematurity, intrauterine growth restriction or low birth weight (LBW) may have an adverse impact on the development of multiple organ systems, predisposing to chronic diseases in childhood and adulthood, such as arterial hypertension and chronic kidney disease. According to human autopsy and epidemiological studies, children born preterm have a lower nephron number, decreased kidney size and, in some cases, affected renal function. The origin of hypertension in children and adults born preterm seems to be multifactorial as a result of alterations in renal, cardiac and vascular development and function. The majority of the studies report increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in individuals born preterm compared to full term. The early prevention and detection of chronic non-communicable diseases, which start from childhood and track until adulthood in children with a history of prematurity or LBW, are important.

Arterial stiffness and nocturnal hypertension in preterm children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preterm birth has been associated with increased risk for developing hypertension and other chronic diseases during childhood and adulthood. The aim of the current prospective case-control study was to investigate the associations of preterm birth with ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels and arterial stiffness during childhood and adolescence. METHODS: The study population included 52 children and adolescents born preterm and 26 healthy children born full term with similar age. The participants underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). RESULTS: Preterm children presented higher night SBP z score values compared to controls, but did not differ in other ABPM parameters, office peripheral and central SBPs. Nocturnal hypertension was found in 78% (7/9) of ex-preterm children with ambulatory BP hypertension. Preterm birth was an independent predictor of PWV z score adjusted for heart rate. Estimated marginal means for PWV z score adjusted for age, sex, presence of kidney disease at birth, office BPs, night BPs, central SBP, and BMI z scores were significantly higher in preterm individuals compared to controls (0.703, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.431-0.975 versus -0.19, 95% CI -0.574-0.536, respectively, P  = 0.027). Preterm children who were overweight presented the highest values of night SBP and PWV z score. CONCLUSION: Preterm birth is associated with higher nocturnal BP and increased arterial stiffness in childhood and adolescence. Increased awareness for detection of hypertension and prevention of obesity in childhood could prevent future adverse cardiovascular outcomes in preterm individuals.

Reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Blood pressure (BP) phenotypes have a prognostic significance for target organ damage in long-term studies. However, it remains uncertain whether a single baseline phenotype classification is reproducible over time and represents accurately the patients' BP status. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension either with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM). PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify studies with paired baseline office BP and ABPM or HBPM measurements at two timepoints. The outcome of the analysis was the individual phenotype reproducibility between the baseline and follow-up timepoints. The used effect measure was Cohen's kappa coefficient. We found 15 studies eligible for the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 5729 patients. The reproducibility of masked hypertension was better with ABPM, kappa reliability test: 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.49], than with HBPM, kappa reliability test: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.40). The reproducibility of office-based hypertension with both methods was low, indicating slight agreement. Kappa reliability test was slightly better with ABPM (κ: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) than with HBPM (κ: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.27). This systematic review and meta-analysis show a slight to fair reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension assessed through ABPM and HBPM. Considering that poor reproducibility may be a result of office BP measurements, an ABPM/HBPM-based strategy should be established for the evaluation and treatment of patients with masked hypertension or office-based hypertension.

Practical guide for the management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia, are a worldwide health problem. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect more than 10% of pregnancies and are associated with increased mortality and morbidity for both mother and fetus. Although patients' outcomes and family's experience will always be the primary concern regarding hypertensive complications during pregnancy, the economic aspect of this disease is also worth noting. Compared with normotensive pregnancies, those related with hypertension resulted in an excess increase in hospitalization and healthcare cost. Hence, the focus of this review is to analyze hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and to present practical tips with clear instructions for the clinical management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This overview offers a detailed approach from the diagnosis to treatment and follow-up of a pregnant women with hypertension, evidence based, to support these instructions.

Comparison of the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics with the fourth report and the 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the diagnosis of hypertension and the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2017, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended new blood pressure (BP) thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. We assessed the impact of the AAP guideline, as compared to the Fourth Report and the 2016 European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH), on the prevalence of hypertension and the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: We systematically searched for studies evaluating the impact of the 2017 AAP guidelines on the prevalence of hypertension and LVH compared with the Fourth Report or the 2016 ESH guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the overall risk of LVH between the guidelines. We used a random-effects model to synthesize quantitative data. RESULTS: We included 18 observational studies in the systematic review with an overall moderate to high risk of bias. The AAP guideline identified more children with hypertension than the Fourth Report and the ESH guidelines. In the meta-analysis of three observational studies, the guidelines revealed similar associations with LVH [odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.68-8.99 for AAP and OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.14-8.88 for Fourth Report/ESH guidelines]. Qualitative analysis of two observational studies revealed similar predictive value of the guidelines for LVH in adult life. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher prevalence of hypertension frequently reported by the adoption of AAP guideline BP thresholds compared with Fourth Report and the ESH guidelines, the new thresholds have not been proved to advance assessment of cardiovascular risk in terms of LVH currently the most accepted subclinical marker in youth.

Impact of Obesity in Kidney Diseases.

The clinical consequences of obesity on the kidneys, with or without metabolic abnormalities, involve both renal function and structures. The mechanisms linking obesity and renal damage are well understood, including several effector mechanisms with interconnected pathways. Higher prevalence of urinary albumin excretion, sub-nephrotic syndrome, nephrolithiasis, increased risk of developing CKD, and progression to ESKD have been identified as being associated with obesity and having a relevant clinical impact. Moreover, renal replacement therapy and kidney transplantation are also influenced by obesity. Losing weight is key in limiting the impact that obesity produces on the kidneys by reducing albuminuria/proteinuria, declining rate of eGFR deterioration, delaying the development of CKD and ESKD, and improving the outcome of a renal transplant. Weight reduction may also contribute to appropriate control of cardiometabolic risk factors such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and dyslipidemia which may be protective not only in renal damage but also cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle changes, some drugs, and bariatric surgery have demonstrated the benefits.

Clinical outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in the offspring during perinatal period, childhood, and adolescence.

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP) could have significant clinical impact not only on the mother's, but also on the offspring's health. The clinical impact of HDP may be evident early in the perinatal period or during childhood and adolescence. The cardiovascular system seems to be primarily affected with higher rates of congenital heart defects reported from cohort studies in the offspring of mothers with HDP. HDP are associated with alterations in cardiac and vascular structure and higher BP during childhood. HDP may also affect brain development and could result in increased prevalence of adverse cognitive outcomes and neuropsychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. The kidney, immune, endocrine, and gastrointestinal system abnormalities could also have their origin in exposure to HDP. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the clinical impact of HDP on the offspring with a focus on the perinatal period, childhood, and adolescence.

American, European and international hypertension guidelines: Time to shake hands?

BACKGROUND: Following evidence-based medicine through guidelines is the first step to successfully treat hypertension and prevent cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: This study compares the recommendations of the most recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) blood pressure and International Society of Hypertension (ISH) focusing on prevalent contrasts among guidelines on when, how and in whom start the treatment, which is a major health implications of guidelines. RESULTS: The three guidelines disagree for the cut-off values in the definition of hypertension. Due to the different cut-off values of BP at the definition of hypertension, a patient may be misclassified to one of the four phenotypes of BP from office and out of office measurements, based to which guidelines are followed by the physicians. In addition to this, each society propose different risk score to evaluate the cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION: These differences cause a confusion not only to the general practitioners, but also the hypertension experts about the correct approach. The poor agreement between guidelines and diagnostic tools implies a huge number of patients remained unknown whether they should receive treatment.