IFNα induces CCR5 in CD4+ T cells of HIV patients causing pathogenic elevation.

BACKGROUND: Among people living with HIV, elite controllers (ECs) maintain an undetectable viral load, even without receiving anti-HIV therapy. In non-EC patients, this therapy leads to marked improvement, including in immune parameters, but unlike ECs, non-EC patients still require ongoing treatment and experience co-morbidities. In-depth, comprehensive immune analyses comparing EC and treated non-EC patients may reveal subtle, consistent differences. This comparison could clarify whether elevated circulating interferon-alpha (IFNα) promotes widespread immune cell alterations and persists post-therapy, furthering understanding of why non-EC patients continue to need treatment. METHODS: Levels of IFNα in HIV-infected EC and treated non-EC patients were compared, along with blood immune cell subset distribution and phenotype, and functional capacities in some cases. In addition, we assessed mechanisms potentially associated with IFNα overload. RESULTS: Treatment of non-EC patients results in restoration of IFNα control, followed by marked improvement in distribution numbers, phenotypic profiles of blood immune cells, and functional capacity. These changes still do not lead to EC status, however, and IFNα can induce these changes in normal immune cell counterparts in vitro. Hypothesizing that persistent alterations could arise from inalterable effects of IFNα at infection onset, we verified an IFNα-related mechanism. The protein induces the HIV coreceptor CCR5, boosting HIV infection and reducing the effects of anti-HIV therapies. EC patients may avoid elevated IFNα following on infection with a lower inoculum of HIV or because of some unidentified genetic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Early control of IFNα is essential for better prognosis of HIV-infected patients.

The treatment for HIV, known as antiretroviral therapy (ART), does not cure HIV but enables individuals to live longer, healthier lives. In this study, we compared immune responses between elite controllers (ECs), who control their HIV infection without any treatment, and ART-treated and untreated patients. We demonstrate that IFNα, a small protein crucial in controlling immune system, is excessively produced at the onset of HIV infection and at levels that persist, resulting in poor HIV control without therapy. We show a mechanism for lack of control of HIV by IFNα. While inhibiting HIV, IFNα also simultaneously increases the HIV co-receptor, CCR5, thereby facilitating virus entry into the target cell. This is avoided by ECs which we hypothesize is associated with a lower infectious inoculum of HIV.

Early elevated IFNα is a key mediator of HIV pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND: A complete understanding of the different steps of HIV replication and an effective drug combination have led to modern antiretroviral regimens that block HIV replication for decades, but these therapies are not curative and must be taken for life. "Elite controllers" (ECs) is a term for the 0.5% of HIV-infected persons requiring no antiretroviral therapy, whose status may point the way toward a functional HIV cure. Defining the mechanisms of this control may be key to understanding how to replicate this functional cure in others. METHODS: In ECs and untreated non-EC patients, we compared IFNα serum concentration, distribution of immune cell subsets, and frequency of cell markers associated with immune dysfunction. We also investigated the effect of an elevated dose of IFNα on distinct subsets within dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and CD4+ and CD8 + T cells. RESULTS: Serum IFNα was undetectable in ECs, but all immune cell subsets from untreated non-EC patients were structurally and functionally impaired. We also show that the altered phenotype and function of these cell subsets in non-EC patients can be recapitulated when cells are stimulated in vitro with high-dose IFNα. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated IFNα is a key mediator of HIV pathogenesis.

Currently, HIV infection is not curable, but infected individuals can manage their condition by taking daily doses of antiretroviral therapy. Some individuals, known as elite controllers (ECs), control their infection without antiretroviral treatment, and studying how their immune system responds to HIV exposure could lead to a potential cure for others. Here, we compare immune cell responses between ECs and untreated non-ECs. We find that IFNα, a small protein with an important role in controlling white blood cell activity, is produced in excess in immune cells from non-ECs compared with ECs during early infection. This insight provides an important clue for the future development of a targeted cure for HIV.

Safety and efficacy of the oral TLR8 agonist selgantolimod in individuals with chronic hepatitis B under viral suppression.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Selgantolimod (GS-9688) is a Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist that suppresses HBV in vitro. In a phase II study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly selgantolimod treatment in virally suppressed individuals with chronic HBV taking oral antiviral treatment. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were randomized into two cohorts (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and -negative [n = 24 each]) to receive oral selgantolimod 3 mg, 1.5 mg, or placebo (2:2:1) once weekly for 24 weeks while maintaining oral antivirals. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a ≥1 log10 IU/ml decline in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from baseline to week 24. Post-treatment, patients continued on oral antivirals for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached by one participant, who was HBeAg-negative and received selgantolimod 1.5 mg. In contrast with placebo-treated patients (n = 9), only selgantolimod-treated patients (n = 39 total) had HBsAg declines greater than 0.1 log10 IU/ml at weeks 24 (18%, 7/39) and 48 (26%, 10/39), HBsAg loss (5%, 2/39 through 48 weeks), or HBeAg loss (16%, 3/19 through 48 weeks). The most common adverse events in selgantolimod-treated groups were nausea (46%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), and vomiting (23%). Gastrointestinal disorders were mostly mild and transient. Selgantolimod induced transient dose-dependent increases in serum cytokines, including IL-12p40, IFN-γ, and IL-1RA, as well as rapid redistribution of some circulating immune cell subsets. CONCLUSION: Oral selgantolimod up to 3 mg once weekly for 24 weeks was generally safe and well tolerated and led to serologic changes associated with progression to durable cure in two individuals by week 48. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03491553. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The only robust criterion for stopping treatment in chronic hepatitis B is loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (known as functional cure), which is rare during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. It is likely that novel antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies will be needed to achieve finite functional cure. Selgantolimod is an oral Toll-like receptor 8 agonist that has shown antiviral activity in vitro as well as safety in a phase I clinical trial with weekly dosing. In this phase II study, selgantolimod therapy was associated with transient increases in serum cytokines, rapid redistribution of circulating immune cell subsets, modest reductions in HBsAg and HBeAg levels, and occasional loss of HBsAg (5%) and HBeAg (16%) among participants with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy with viral suppression. Our results support continued development of selgantolimod as a component of a future hepatitis B cure regimen.

Neuronal and Glial Metabolite Abnormalities in Participants With Persistent Neuropsychiatric Symptoms After COVID-19: A Brain Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether neurometabolite abnormalities indicating neuroinflammation and neuronal injury are detectable in individuals post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms. METHODS: All participants were studied with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T to assess neurometabolite concentrations (point-resolved spectroscopy, relaxation time/echo time = 3000/30 ms) in frontal white matter (FWM) and anterior cingulate cortex-gray matter (ACC-GM). Participants also completed the National Institutes of Health Toolbox cognition and motor batteries and selected modules from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were evaluated: 29 post-COVID-19 (mean ± SD age, 42.4 ± 12.3 years; approximately 8 months from COVID-19 diagnosis; 19 women) and 25 controls (age, 44.1 ± 12.3 years; 14 women). When compared with controls, the post-COVID-19 group had lower total N-acetyl compounds (tNAA; ACC-GM: -5.0%, P = .015; FWM: -4.4%, P = .13), FWM glutamate + glutamine (-9.5%, P = .001), and ACC-GM myo-inositol (-6.2%, P = .024). Additionally, only hospitalized patients post-COVID-19 showed age-related increases in myo-inositol, choline compounds, and total creatine (interaction P = .029 to <.001). Across all participants, lower FWM tNAA and higher ACC-GM myo-inositol predicted poorer performance on several cognitive measures (P = .001-.009), while lower ACC-GM tNAA predicted lower endurance on the 2-minute walk (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: In participants post-COVID-19 with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms, the lower-than-normal tNAA and glutamate + glutamine indicate neuronal injury, while the lower-than-normal myo-inositol reflects glial dysfunction, possibly related to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Post-COVID participants with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Quantifying the Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) using the NIH Toolbox® and PROMIS.

Objective: To quantify neuropsychiatric symptoms reported by individuals with Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) using the NIH Toolbox® for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIHTB) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Methods: 30 PASC (20 women, 21-63 years) and 27 control (16 women, 25-68 years) participants completed three NIHTB batteries and selected PROMIS tests. Group differences on fully corrected T-scores were evaluated using analysis of covariance and Cohen's d effect sizes. A linear regression model predicted the effects from time since diagnosis. Results: PASC had poorer emotional health and motor function than controls, including poorer locomotion, endurance and dexterity, but normal cognitive function, ~7 months post-infection, compared to controls. PASC participants had a steeper age-related decline on 2-Minute Walk than controls. T-scores on four cognitive and three motor tests improved with longer time since diagnosis. Conclusion: NIHTB and PROMIS captured the poorer emotional health and motor function in PASC, including the novel findings of deficits locomotion and dexterity. The normal cognitive performance suggests subclinical effects that may be compensated by neural and cognitive reserves, and manifested subjectively by the negative psychological effects and fatigue. The persistent emotional and psychiatric symptoms necessitate mental health treatment be prioritized.

Ongoing oxidative stress in individuals with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with lower plasma glutathione (GSH) levels due to oxidative stress. However, plasma levels may not reflect brain GSH levels. Individuals with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) have a higher prevalence of cognitive fatigue, which might be related to altered brain γ-aminobutyric-acid (GABA) levels. Hence, our study aims to measure the brain GSH and GABA levels in PASC. Methods: 29 PASC participants and 24 uninfected controls were recruited for this study. Each was evaluated with detailed neuropsychiatric assessments and an edited proton MRS (Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction of Mega-Edited Spectroscopy, HERMES) method to measure GABA and GSH concentrations in predominantly grey matter (GM) and predominantly white matter (WM) brain frontal voxels. Results: PASC participants were 219 ± 137 days since their COVID-19 diagnosis. Nine individuals with PASC were hospitalized. Compared to controls, individuals with PASC had similar levels of GABA in both brain regions, but lower GSH and greater age-related GSH decline in the frontal GM region. Conclusions: The lower-than-normal frontal GM GSH level in participants with PASC suggest that they have ongoing oxidative stress in the brain, and that older individuals may be even more vulnerable to oxidative stress.

Use of nonstigmatizing language is associated with improved outcomes in hospitalized people who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: Stigma surrounding opioid use disorder (OUD) is a barrier to treatment. The use of stigmatizing language may be evidence of negative views toward patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify associations between language and clinical outcomes in patients admitted for infectious complications of OUD. DESIGNS: We performed a retrospective medical record review. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Four U.S. academic health systems. Participants were patients with OUD admitted for infectious complications of injection opioid use from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018, identified through international classification of diseases, 10th revision codes consistent with OUD and acute bacterial/fungal infection. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Discharge summaries were reviewed for language, specifically: abuse, addiction, dependence, misuse, use disorder, intravenous drug use, and others. Binary outcomes including medication for OUD, planned discharge, naloxone provision, and an OUD treatment plan were evaluated using logistic regressions and admission duration was evaluated using Gamma regression. RESULTS: A total of 1285 records were reviewed and 328 met inclusion criteria. Of those, 191 (58%) were male, with a median age of 38 years. The most common term was "abuse" (219, 67%), whereas "use disorder" was recorded in 75 (23%) records. Having "use disorder" in the discharge summary was associated with increased odds of having a documented plan for ongoing OUD treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 4.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-8.93) and having a documented plan for addiction-specific follow-up care (AOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.30-4.09). CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatizing language was common in this study of patients hospitalized for infectious complications of OUD. Best-practice language was uncommon, but when used was associated with increased odds of addiction treatment and specialty care referrals.

Undertreatment of opioid use disorder in patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation and addiction consultation and outcomes for patients hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at four academic medical centers in the United States. The participants were patients who had been hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids in 2018. Three hundred and twenty-two patients were included and their individual patient records were manually reviewed to identify inpatient receipt of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), initiation of MOUD, and addiction consultation. The main outcomes of interest were premature discharge, MOUD on discharge, linkage to outpatient MOUD, one-year readmission and death. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two patients were predominately male (59%), white (66%), and median age 38 years, with 36% unstably housed, and 30% uninsured. One hundred and forty-five (45%) patients received MOUD during hospitalization, including only 65 (28%) patients not on baseline MOUD. Discharge was premature for 64 (20%) patients. In the year following discharge, 27 (9%) patients were linked to MOUD, and 159 (50%) patients had at least one readmission. Being on MOUD during hospitalization was significantly associated with higher odds of planned discharge [odds ratio (OR) 3.87, P  < 0.0001], MOUD on discharge (OR 129.7, P  < 0.0001), and linkage to outpatient MOUD (OR 1.25, P  < 0.0001), however, was not associated with readmission. Study limitations were the retrospective nature of the study, so post-discharge data are likely underestimated. CONCLUSION: There was dramatic undertreatment with MOUD from inpatient admission to outpatient linkage, and high rates of premature discharge and readmission. Engagement in addiction care during hospitalization is a critical first step in improving the care continuum for individuals with opioid use disorder; however, additional interventions may be needed to impact long-term outcomes like readmission.

Changes in Brain Activation Patterns During Working Memory Tasks in People With Post-COVID Condition and Persistent Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-COVID condition (PCC) is common and often involves neuropsychiatric symptoms. This study aimed to use blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI (BOLD-fMRI) to assess whether participants with PCC had abnormal brain activation during working memory (WM) and whether the abnormal brain activation could predict cognitive performance, motor function, or psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: The participants with PCC had documented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at least 6 weeks before enrollment. Healthy control participants had no prior history of COVID-19 and negative tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Participants were assessed using 3 NIH Toolbox (NIHTB) batteries for Cognition (NIHTB-CB), Emotion (NIHTB-EB), and Motor function (NIHTB-MB) and selected tests from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Each had BOLD-fMRI at 3T, during WM (N-back) tasks with increasing attentional/WM load. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine participants were screened; 50 fulfilled the study criteria and had complete and usable data sets for this cross-sectional cohort study. Twenty-nine participants with PCC were diagnosed with COVID-19 242 ± 156 days earlier; they had similar ages (42 ± 12 vs 41 ± 12 years), gender proportion (65% vs 57%), racial/ethnic distribution, handedness, education, and socioeconomic status, as the 21 uninfected healthy controls. Despite the high prevalence of memory (79%) and concentration (93%) complaints, the PCC group had similar performance on the NIHTB-CB as the controls. However, participants with PCC had greater brain activation than the controls across the network (false discovery rate-corrected p = 0.003, Tmax = 4.17), with greater activation in the right superior frontal gyrus (p = 0.009, Cohen d = 0.81, 95% CI 0.15-1.46) but lesser deactivation in the default mode regions (p = 0.001, d = 1.03, 95% CI 0.61-1.99). Compared with controls, participants with PCC also had poorer dexterity and endurance on the NIHTB-MB, higher T scores for negative affect and perceived stress, but lower T scores for psychological well-being on the NIHTB-EB, as well as more pain symptoms and poorer mental and physical health on measures from the PROMIS. Greater brain activation predicted poorer scores on measures that were abnormal on the NIHTB-EB. DISCUSSION: Participants with PCC and neuropsychiatric symptoms demonstrated compensatory neural processes with greater usage of alternate brain regions, and reorganized networks, to maintain normal performance during WM tasks. BOLD-fMRI was sensitive for detecting brain abnormalities that correlated with various quantitative neuropsychiatric symptoms.

IFNα induces CCR5 in CD4+ T-cells, causing its anti- HIV inefficiency and its subsequent pathogenic elevation, partially controlled by anti-HIV therapy.

Like EC, we find that ART-treated patients control serum IFNα concentration and show few immune cell alterations enabling a healthy but fragile medical status. However, treatment interruption leads to elevated IFNα reflecting virus production indicating that like EC, ART does not achieve a virological cure. The immune system becomes overwhelmed by multiple immune cell abnormalities as found in untreated patients. These are chiefly mediated by elevated IFNα inducing signaling checkpoints abnormalities, including PD1, in cytotoxic immune cells. Importantly, during acute infection, elevated IFNα correlated with HIV load and we found that IFNα enhances CCR5, the HIV coreceptor in CD4+ T-cells, impairing its anti-viral response and accounting for the pathogenic vicious cycle: HIV → IFNα ↗ → infected CD4+ T-cells ↗ →HIV ↗. This study opens immunotherapeutic perspectives showing the need to control IFNα in order to convert ART patients into EC.

Early Elevated IFNα Identified as the Key Mediator of HIV Pathogenesis and its low level a Hallmark of Elite Controllers.

Advances in HIV therapy came from understanding its replication. Further progress toward "functional cure" -no therapy needed as found in Elite Controllers (EC)- may come from insights in pathogenesis and avoidance by EC. Here we show that all immune cells from HIV-infected persons are impaired in non-EC, but not in EC. Since HIV infects few cell types, these results suggest an additional mediator of pathogenesis. We identify that mediator as elevated pathogenic IFNα, controlled by EC likely by their preserved potent NK-cells and later by other killer cells. Since the earliest days of infection predict outcome genetic or chance events must be key to EC, and since we found no unique immune parameter at the onset, we suggest a chance infection with a lower HIV inoculum. These results offer an additional approach toward functional cure: a judicious targeting of IFNα for all non-EC patients.

Abnormal brain diffusivity in participants with persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19.

Objectives: We aimed to compare brain white matter integrity in participants with post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC) and healthy controls. Methods: We compared cognitive performance (NIH Toolbox®), psychiatric symptoms and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics between 23 PCC participants and 24 controls. Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial (AD), radial (RD), and mean (MD) diffusivities were measured in 9 white matter tracts and 6 subcortical regions using MRICloud. Results: Compared to controls, PCC had similar cognitive performance, but greater psychiatric symptoms and perceived stress, as well as higher FA and lower diffusivities in multiple white matter tracts (ANCOVA-p-values≤0.001-0.048). Amongst women, PCC had higher left amygdala-MD than controls (sex-by-PCC p=0.006). Regardless of COVID-19 history, higher sagittal strata-FA predicted greater fatigue (r=0.48-0.52, p<0.001) in all participants, and higher left amygdala-MD predicted greater fatigue (r=0.61, p<0.001) and anxiety (r=0.69, p<0.001) in women, and higher perceived stress (r=0.45, p=0.002) for all participants. Conclusions: Microstructural abnormalities are evident in PCC participants averaged six months after COVID-19. The restricted diffusivity (with reduced MD) and higher FA suggest enhanced myelination or increased magnetic susceptibility from iron deposition, as seen in stress conditions. The higher amygdala-MD in female PCC suggests persistent neuroinflammation, which might contribute to their fatigue, anxiety, and perceived stress.

Immune drivers of HBsAg loss in HBeAg-negative CHB patients after stopping nucleotide analog and administration of Peg-IFN.

BACKGROUND: The stoppage of nucleoside analog (NA) can lead to immune flare and loss of HBsAg in a proportion of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. HBsAg loss could be improved by instituting Peg-Interferon therapy in those who show an immune flare after the stoppage of NA. We investigated the immune drivers of HBsAg loss in NA-treated HBeAg-negative CHB patients after stopping NAs and administration of Peg-IFN-α2b therapy. METHODS: Fifty-five NA-treated eAg-ve, HBV DNA not detected CHB patients were subjected to stopping NA therapy. Twenty-two (40%) patients relapsed (REL-CHBV) within 6 months (HBV DNA ≥2000 IU/mL, ALT ≥2XULN) and were started on Peg-IFN-α2b (1.5 mcg/kg) for 48 weeks (PEG-CHBV). Cytokine levels, immune responses, and T-cell functionality were assessed. RESULTS: Only 22 (40%) of 55 patients clinically relapsed, of which 6 (27%) cleared HBsAg. None of the 33 (60%) nonrelapsers cleared HBsAg. REL-CHBV patients had significantly increased IL-6 (p=0.035), IFN-γ (p=0.049), Th1/17 (p=0.005), CD4 effector memory (EM) (p=0.01), Tfh1/17 (p=0.005), and mature B cells (p=0.04) compared with CHBV. Six months after Peg-IFN therapy, immune resetting with a significant increase in CXCL10 (p=0.042), CD8 (p=0.01), CD19 (p=0.001), and mature B cells (p=0.001) was observed. HBV-specific T-cell functionality showed increased Tfh-secreting IFN-γ (p=0.001), IL-21 (p=0.001), and TNF-α (p=0.005) in relapsers and IFN-γ-secreting CD4 T cell (p=0.03) in PEG-CHBV. CONCLUSIONS: Stopping NA therapy induces flare in about 40% of HBeAg-negative patients. Peg-IFN therapy given to such patients causes immune restoration with HBsAg loss in one fourth of them.

Viral hepatitis elimination challenges in low- and middle-income countries-Uzbekistan Hepatitis Elimination Program (UHEP).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic infection with hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV & HCV) is a major contributor to liver disease and liver-related mortality in Uzbekistan. There is a need to demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale simplified testing and treatment to implement a national viral hepatitis elimination program. METHODS: Thirteen polyclinics were utilized to screen, conduct follow-up biochemical measures and treat chronic HBV and HCV infection in the general adult population. Task shifting and motivational interviewing training allowed nurses to provide rapid screening and general practitioners (GPs) to treat individuals on-site. An electronic medical system tracked individuals through the cascade of care. RESULTS: The use of rapid tests allowed for screening of 60 769 people for HCV and HBV over 6 months and permitted outdoor testing during the COVID-19 pandemic along with COVID testing. 13%-14% of individuals were lost to follow-up after the rapid test, and another 62%-66% failed to come in for their consultation. One stop testing and treatment did not result in a statistically increase in retention and lack of patient awareness of viral hepatitis was identified as a key factor. Despite training, there were large differences between GPs and patients initiating treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale general population screening and task shifting in low- and middle-income countries. However, such programs need to be proceeded by awareness campaign to minimize loss to follow up. In addition, multiple trainings are needed for GPs to bolster their skills to talk to patients about treatment.

A Phase 2 open label study of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in subjects with hepatitis B virus infection.

Retrospective data showed that when we administered ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) to patients with hepatitis B and C coinfection, there was a modest reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Therefore, we hypothesize that similar HBsAg reduction can be seen in hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfected subjects. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints are the decline in HBsAg and HBV DNA at Week 12 from baseline, respectively. We conducted an open-label Phase 2 pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of LDV and/or SOF for HBV. Eligible subjects were either suppressed on antivirals (Group B) or inactive chronic HBV (Group A, C, D). Group A and B received LDV/SOF. Group C and D received SOF 400 mg and LDV 90 mg, respectively. All subjects completed the study, and all related adverse events (AEs) were mild. No discontinuations due to AEs or hepatitis flare occurred. At Week 12, HBsAg decline (log10 IU/ml) was similar between Group A (0.399) and B (0.400), less in Group C (0.207), and none in Group D, and there was HBV DNA decline in the inactive chronic HBV groups. LDV and SOF are safe and well tolerated when given to chronic hepatitis B subjects and have modest antiviral activity, particularly when given in combination.

Immunomodulatory therapies for COVID-19.

Purpose: As COVID-19 disease progresses, the host inflammatory response contributes to hypoxemia and severe and critical illness. In these latter stages of disease, patients may benefit from immunomodulatory therapies to control the aberrant host inflammatory response. In this review, we provide an overview of these therapies and provide summaries of the studies that led to issuance of FDA Emergency Use Authorization or recommendation by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Materials and methods: We reviewed English-language studies, Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs), and guidelines from March 2020 to present. Conclusion and relevance: There are several therapies with proposed benefit in severe and critical COVID-19 disease. Few have been issued FDA EUA or recommendation by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Physicians should be familiar with the evidence supporting use of these therapies and the patient populations most likely to benefit from each.

Persistent CD38 Expression on CD8 + T Lymphocytes Contributes to Altered Mitochondrial Function and Chronic Inflammation in People With HIV, Despite ART.

BACKGROUND: Age-associated comorbidities are higher in people with HIV (PWH) than HIV-negative individuals. This is partially attributed to immune activation and CD38 expression on T cells driving chronic inflammation. However, the exact contribution of CD38-expressing T cells on the proinflammatory response is not completely understood. METHODS: CD38-expressing CD8 + T lymphocytes were measured from PWH and HIV-negative individuals. Mitochondrial mass, superoxide content, membrane depolarization of CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes, and cytokine production after HIV(Gag)-specific peptide stimulation from CD38 + CD8 + T lymphocytes of PWH were measured to link biological effects of CD38 expression on cellular metabolism. RESULTS: The frequency of activated CD8 + CD38 + T cells persists in PWH on ART compared with HIV-negative individuals. Higher CD38 expression is associated with mitochondrial biogenesis and HIV(Gag)-specific proinflammatory cytokine production in PWH. Blockade of CD38 results in lower Gag-specific cytokine production. CONCLUSIONS: ART only partially reduced HIV-induced CD38 expression on CD8 + T cells. CD8 + CD38 + T cells are highly activated in vivo, and HIV-specific stimulation in vitro augments CD38 expression, contributing to a proinflammatory response despite virologic control with ART. Therefore, CD38 is a potential therapeutic target for mitigating chronic inflammation that likely drives cellular aging, comorbidities, and end-organ disease in PWH.

Type I interferons and TGF-ß cooperate to induce liver fibrosis during HIV-1 infection under antiretroviral therapy.

Liver diseases have become a major comorbidity health concern for people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). To investigate if HIV-1 infection and cART interact to lead to liver diseases, humanized mice reconstituted with progenitor cells from human fetal livers were infected with HIV-1 and treated with cART. We report here that chronic HIV-1 infection with cART induced hepatitis and liver fibrosis in humanized mice, associated with accumulation of M2-like macrophages (M2LMs), elevated TGF-ß, and IFN signaling in the liver. Interestingly, IFN-I and TGF-ß cooperatively activated human hepatic stellate cells (HepSCs) in vitro. Mechanistically, IFN-I enhanced TGF-ß-induced SMAD2/3 activation in HepSCs. Finally, blockade of IFN-I signaling reversed HIV/cART-induced liver diseases in humanized mice. Consistent with the findings in humanized mice with HIV-1 and cART, we detected elevated markers of liver injury, M2LMs, and of IFN signaling in blood specimens from PLWH compared with those of healthy individuals. These findings identify the IFN-I/M2LM/HepSC axis in HIV/cART-induced liver diseases and suggest that inhibiting IFN-I signaling or M2LM may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for treating HIV/cART-associated liver diseases in PLWH treated with antiretroviral therapy.

Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-antiviral therapeutic options are required for the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. CD24Fc is an immunomodulator with potential to reduce the exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD24Fc in hospitalised adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen support. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study at nine medical centres in the USA. Hospitalised patients (age ≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving oxygen support and standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) by site-stratified block randomisation to receive a single intravenous infusion of CD24Fc 480 mg or placebo. The study funder, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement over 28 days, defined as time that elapsed between a baseline National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale score of 2-4 and reaching a score of 5 or higher or hospital discharge. The prespecified primary interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04317040. FINDINGS: Between April 24 and Sept 22, 2020, 243 hospitalised patients were assessed for eligibility and 234 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CD24Fc (n=116) or placebo (n=118). The prespecified interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint among 197 randomised participants. In the interim analysis, the 28-day clinical improvement rate was 82% (81 of 99) for CD24Fc versus 66% (65 of 98) for placebo; median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-8·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·0 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·16-2·23; log-rank p=0·0028, which crossed the prespecified efficacy boundary [α=0·0147]). 37 participants were randomly assigned after the interim analysis data cutoff date; among the 234 randomised participants, median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-9·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·5 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; log-rank p=0·037). The proportion of participants with disease progression within 28 days was 19% (22 of 116) in the CD24Fc group versus 31% (36 of 118) in the placebo group (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·33-0·95; unadjusted p=0·031). The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: CD24Fc is generally well tolerated and accelerates clinical improvement of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who are receiving oxygen support. These data suggest that targeting inflammation in response to tissue injuries might provide a therapeutic option for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. FUNDING: Merck & Co, National Cancer Institute, OncoImmune.

Use of oral polio vaccine and the incidence of COVID-19 in the world.

BACKGROUND: Several live attenuated vaccines were shown to provide temporary protection against a variety of infectious diseases through stimulation of the host innate immune system. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that countries using oral polio vaccine (OPV) have a lower cumulative number of cases diagnosed with COVID-19 per 100,000 population (CP100K) compared with those using only inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). METHODS: In an ecological study, the CP100K was compared between countries using OPV vs IPV. We used a random-effect meta-analysis technique to estimate the pooled mean for CP100K. We also used negative binomial regression with CP100K as the dependent variable and the human development index (HDI) and the type of vaccine used as independent variables. RESULTS: The pooled estimated mean CP100K was 4970 (95% CI 4030 to 5900) cases per 100,000 population for countries using IPV, significantly (p<0.001) higher than that for countries using OPV-1580 (1190 to 1960). Countries with higher HDI prefer to use IPV; those with lower HDI commonly use OPV. Both HDI and the type of vaccine were independent predictors of CP100K. Use of OPV compared to IPV could independently decrease the CP100K by an average of 30% at the mean HDI of 0.72. CONCLUSIONS: Countries using OPV have a lower incidence of COVID-19 compared to those using IPV. This might suggest that OPV may either prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection at individual level or slow down the transmission at the community level.