Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 123(2): 142-6, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21198444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) recently approved as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial seizures in adults. LCM is available in oral and intravenous formulations, has linear pharmacokinetics and a unique mechanism of action. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous LCM in the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) after failure of conventional therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with NCSE treated with LCM. We reviewed the clinical and electrographic changes before and after LCM administration. We also noted any reported side effects including electrocardiographic changes. RESULTS: We report four cases of NCSE that were refractory to conventional treatment, but readily responsive to LCM. No side effects attributable to LCM were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous LCM may be safe and efficacious as an add-on AED for the treatment of NCSE when standard therapy fails.


Subject(s)
Acetamides/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Acetamides/adverse effects , Aged , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous/methods , Lacosamide , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Neuropsychologia ; 48(7): 2221-5, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20230846

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To characterize the interaction between language dominance and lateralization of the epileptic focus for pre- and postoperative Boston Naming Test (BNT) performance in patients undergoing anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). METHODS: Analysis of pre- and postoperative BNT scores depending on lateralization of language as measured by the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) versus lateralization of the temporal lobe epileptic focus. RESULTS: Changes between pre- and postoperative BNT performance depended on epilepsy lateralization (effect size=0.189) with significant decrease in patients undergoing left ATL. Subgroup analysis in these showed that postoperative decline in BNT scores was significant in patients with atypical (n=14; p<0.05), but did not reach statistical significance in patients with left language dominance (n=36; p=0.09). Chi-square test revealed a trend of higher proportions of patients experiencing significant postsurgical deterioration in naming performance in atypical (57.1%) as compared to left language dominance (30.6%; p=0.082). Surgical failure was also associated with greater decline of BNT scores and was more common in atypical than in left language dominant patients (chi(2) (1, n=98)=4.62, p=0.032). Age of onset, duration of epilepsy, and seizure frequency had no impact on changes in BNT performance. CONCLUSION: Atypical language dominance is a predictor of change in visual naming performance after left ATL and may also impact postsurgical seizure control. This should be considered when counseling surgical candidates.


Subject(s)
Anterior Temporal Lobectomy/adverse effects , Functional Laterality/physiology , Language Disorders/etiology , Names , Perceptual Disorders/etiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Amobarbital/therapeutic use , Analysis of Variance , Epilepsy/surgery , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Neurology ; 70(22 Pt 2): 2166-70, 2008 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505995

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Nonsedating antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that can be initiated rapidly are desirable in a variety of clinical situations. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a newer AED, with a recently approved parenteral formulation, that can be initiated at doses effective in controlling seizures. We investigated whether oral loading of levetiracetam is well tolerated and facilitates stabilization and discharge of patients in epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). METHODS: Adult patients in the EMU at two centers were identified who received 1,500 mg of LEV in a single dose. This was an observational study of these patients where LEV was thought to be an appropriate component of the therapeutic regimen. Patients were either LEV naive or had been off all LEV for at least 3 days. LEV maintenance was begun 12 hours later at doses of 500 to 1,000 mg twice a day. RESULTS: A total of 37 adult patients (20 female) were identified. There were no spontaneous complaints of side effects. Upon questioning, 33 patients (89%) denied side effects. The remaining 4 patients (11%) reported transient irritability, imbalance, tiredness, or lightheadedness. Eleven patients (mean weight = 85.0 Kg) had mean LEV serum concentration of 31.5 microg/mL after 1 hour, 23 (mean weight 85.7 Kg) had mean concentration of 30.77 microg/mL after 2 hours, five (mean weight 84.3 Kg) had mean concentration of 12.1 microg/mL after 12 hours, and two (mean weight 94 Kg) had mean concentration of 7.4 microg/mL after 14 hours. No seizures occurred within 24 hours of loading. All patients were able to be discharged 3 to 30 hours after loading. CONCLUSIONS: In the population surveyed, oral loading with levetiracetam was well-tolerated and rapidly yielded serum concentrations thought to decrease seizure frequency. This regimen facilitated discharge from the epilepsy monitoring units.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Drug Evaluation , Drug Tolerance/physiology , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anticonvulsants/blood , Epilepsy/blood , Female , Humans , Levetiracetam , Male , Middle Aged , Piracetam/administration & dosage , Piracetam/blood , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
4.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 97(Pt 2): 347-56, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17691323

ABSTRACT

The present chapter describes the most important available experimental and clinical evidence on the role of electrical stimulation of the cerebellum or the thalamus in the control of epilepsy. Cerebellum serves as an integrator of sensory information and regulator of motor coordinating and training. The sole output of the cerebellum is inhibitory Purkinje cell projections to deep cerebellar nuclei in the brainstem. Cerebellar stimulation in animal models of epilepsy has given mixed results. Nevertheless, more than 130 epileptic patients have been subjected to cerebellar stimulation and the results from uncontrolled studies have been encouraging. The anterior thalamic nucleus (ATN) is part of the Papez circuit, a group of limbic structures with demonstrated role in epilepsy. The centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMN) is considered part of the thalamic reticular system. Stimulation of either of these nuclei in experimental animals has been associated with considerable antiepileptic effects. On the basis of the research evidence, numerous studies have been done on humans, which gave promising results. Currently, a multicenter trial on stimulation of the ATN, the SANTE trial is in progress in the USA. On the basis of the reported studies, the authors aim to provide insights into how the electrical stimulation of the above structures exerts an antiepileptic effect and also provide suggestions regarding the future progress in this field.


Subject(s)
Cerebellum/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy/pathology , Epilepsy/therapy , Thalamus/physiopathology , Humans , Neural Pathways/pathology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Review Literature as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL