ABSTRACT
Background: Little League elbow, including humeral epicondylitis and osteochondritis dissecans, is a severe throwing injury in school-aged pitchers. Recent rule revisions have been implemented, and thus, prevention awareness may have increased. Purpose: To compare the incidence of elbow injury in 2011 from a previous study with that in 2021 and examine changes in the incidence and characteristics of players with elbow injuries. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A survey based on the 2011 survey was conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2021, among 4060 third- to sixth-grade Little League players belonging to 203 teams in Kyoto, Japan. This survey included a 23-item checklist on physical condition and injury. The participants were classified into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of an elbow injury in the dominant arm during the season. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted to compare differences in basic information between the 2 groups. We also compared the differences in the 23 checklist items between the 2 groups using the chi-square or Fisher exact probability test. Results: Overall, 98 teams (1335 players; age range, 8-12 years) returned the questionnaires (collection rate, 32.9%). The final analysis population (excluding incomplete questionnaires) was 678 (mean age, 10.6 ± 1.1 years). Elbow injuries accounted for 30.7% of all injury sites in the players. Overall, 61 players (9.0%) reported elbow injuries in 2021 compared with 19.1% of the players in the 2011 survey (P < .01) A significantly higher percentage of players with elbow injuries had elbow pain in extension (item 2 on the survey checklist, P < .001) and flexion (item 4, P < .0024), were regular players (item 5, P = .0288), played baseball under fatigue (item 8, P = .0028), and had lower and upper limb inflexibility (item 17, P = .0379; item 18, P = .0146; and item 22, P = .0085). Conclusion: Study findings indicated that the incidence of elbow injuries has decreased significantly over the past 10 years, although the elbow joint still accounted for almost one-third of all injuries in Japanese youth baseball players.
ABSTRACT
Background: Shoulder range of motion (ROM) is one of the most important indicators of shoulder disease severity, function, and physical assessment. A universal goniometer (UG) was used as a gold standard for ROM measurement. Recently, smartphone applications for ROM measurement have attracted attention as alternatives to UG. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of active ROM measurements using a smartphone application goniometer that can be used by patients in a standing position. Methods: The dominant shoulders of 19 healthy participants were included in the study. The 2 observers who were physical therapists used the UG, whereas the participants used a smartphone application goniometer to measure the shoulder ROM. A recorder, who is a physical therapist independent of the observer and participant, read and recorded the shoulder ROM measurements. The order of the measurement movements and devices used was randomized. Results: Agreement between the smartphone application goniometer and UG (percentage of participants for whom the difference between the UG and application measurements was within ±20% of the mean of the goniometer and application measurements) ranged between 42% and 100%. The intraclass correlation coefficient values (3, 1) for the agreement between the smartphone application goniometer and UG was between 0.72 and 0.97, showing significant and approximately perfect correlations. Conclusion: High agreement with the UG showed excellent validity, indicating that the smartphone application goniometer used by the participants in the standing position is an excellent method and instrument. The results suggest a simpler, more reliable, practical, and inexpensive method for measuring ROM required for telerehabilitation.
