Clinical Activity of an hTERT-Specific Cancer Vaccine (Vx-001) in "Immune Desert" NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Tumors can be separated into immunogenic/hot and non-immunogenic/cold on the basis of the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the expression of PD-L1 and the tumor mutation burden (TMB). In immunogenic tumors, TILs become unable to control tumor growth because their activity is suppressed by different inhibitory pathways, including PD-1/PD-L1. We hypothesized that tumor vaccines may not be active in the immunosuppressive microenvironment of immunogenic/hot tumors while they could be efficient in the immune naïve microenvironment of non-immunogenic/cold tumors. METHODS: The randomized phase II Vx-001-201 study investigated the effect of the Vx-001 vaccine as maintenance treatment in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Biopsies from 131 (68 placebo and 63 Vx-001) patients were retrospectively analyzed for PD-L1 expression and TIL infiltration. TILs were measured as tumor-associated immune cells (TAICs), CD3-TILs, CD8-TILs and granzyme B-producing TILs (GZMB-TILs). Patients were distinguished into PD-L1(+) and PD-L1(-) and into TIL high and TIL low. FINDINGS: There was no correlation between PD-L1 expression and Vx-001 clinical activity. In contrast, Vx-001 showed a significant improvement of overall survival (OS) vs. placebo in TAIC low (21 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.003, HR = 0.404, 95% CI 0.219-0.745), CD3-TIL low (21.6 vs. 6.6 months, p < 0.001, HR = 0.279, 95% CI 0.131-0.595), CD8-TIL low (21 vs. 6.6 months, p < 0.001; HR = 0.240, 95% CI 0.11-0.522) and GZMB-TIL low (20.7 vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.011, HR = 0.490, 95% CI 0.278-0.863). Vx-001 did not offer any clinical benefit in patients with TAIC high, CD3-TIL high, CD8-TIL high or GZMB-TIL high tumors. CD3-TIL, CD8-TIL and GZMB-TIL were independent predictive factors of Vx-001 efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that Vx-001 may be efficient in patients with non-immunogenic/cold but not with immunogenic/hot tumors.

MINOAS: A Single-arm Translational Phase II Trial of FOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as First-line Therapy in Unresectable, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: FOLFIRI/aflibercept is approved as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but there are limited data for its use as a first-line treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activity and safety of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept in mCRC, as well as to prospectively evaluate biomarkers of early response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MINOAS was a phase II trial that aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept in mCRC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of CEACAM-positive circulating tumor cells (CTC) and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI as biomarkers. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 259 chemotherapy cycles were administered. At the time of the preplanned interim analysis, all patients had discontinued treatment and the ORR was 61.3%, crossing the activity threshold for trial discontinuation. Median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI 7.8-9.0). Median OS had not been reached. There was one toxic death due to sepsis; grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 6), hypertension (n = 4), asthenia (n = 3), proteinuria (n = 1), and bowel perforation (n = 1). Retaining CTC-negative status predicted better OS compared to continuous detection of CTCs (p = 0.015). Early decrease of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in DW-MRI was associated with an objective response. CONCLUSION: The activity and safety of first-line FOLFIRI/aflibercept merit further evaluation in randomized studies. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02624726.