Latent tuberculosis screening and treatment among asylum seekers: a mixed-methods study.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on conditions for implementation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening and treatment among asylum seekers is needed to inform tuberculosis (TB) control policies. We used mixed-methods to evaluate the implementation of an LTBI screening and treatment programme among asylum seekers in the Netherlands. METHODS: We offered voluntary LTBI screening to asylum seekers aged ≥12 years living in asylum seeker centres from countries with a TB incidence >200 per 10 000 population. We calculated LTBI screening and treatment cascade coverage, and assessed associated factors with Poisson regression using robust variance estimators. We interviewed TB care staff (seven group interviews) and Eritrean clients (21 group and 21 individual interviews) to identify programme enhancers and barriers. RESULTS: We screened 719 (63% of 1136) clients for LTBI. LTBI was diagnosed among 178 (25%) clients; 149 (84%) initiated LTBI treatment, of whom 129 (87%) completed treatment. In-person TB and LTBI education, the use of professional interpreters, and collaboration with partner organisations were enhancers for LTBI screening uptake. Demand-driven LTBI treatment support by TB nurses enhanced treatment completion. Factors complicating LTBI screening and treatment were having to travel to public health services, language barriers and moving from asylum seeker centres to the community during treatment. CONCLUSION: LTBI screening and treatment of asylum seekers is feasible and effective when high quality of care is provided, including culture-sensitive TB education throughout the care cascade. Additionally, collaboration with partner organisations, such as agencies responsible for reception and support of asylum seekers, should be in place.

Implementation of latent tuberculosis infection screening and treatment among newly arriving immigrants in the Netherlands: A mixed methods pilot evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: To reach pre-elimination levels of tuberculosis (TB) incidence in the Netherlands, prevention of TB among immigrants through diagnosis and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) is needed. We studied the feasibility of a LTBI screening and treatment program among newly arriving immigrants for national implementation. METHODS: We used mixed methods to evaluate the implementation of LTBI screening and treatment in five Public Health Services (PHS) among immigrants from countries with a TB incidence >50/100,000 population. We used Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators to assess factors associated with LTBI diagnosis and LTBI treatment initiation and reported reasons for not initiating or completing LTBI treatment. We interviewed five PHS teams using a semi-structured method to identify enhancing and impeding factors for LTBI screening and treatment. RESULTS: We screened 566 immigrants; 94 (17%) were diagnosed with LTBI, of whom 49 (52%) initiated and 34 (69%) completed LTBI treatment. LTBI diagnosis was associated with male gender, higher age group, higher TB incidence in the country of origin and lower level of education. Treatment initiation was associated with PHS (ranging from 29% to 86%), lower age group, longer intended duration of stay in the Netherlands, and lower level of education. According to TB physicians, clients and their consulted physicians in the home country lacked awareness about benefits of LTBI treatment. Furthermore, TB physicians questioned the individual and public health benefit of clients who return to their country of origin within the foreseeable future. CONCLUSIONS: Doubt of physicians in both host country and country of origin about individual and public health benefits of LTBI screening and treatment of immigrants hampered treatment initiation: the high initiation proportion in one PHS shows that if TB physicians are committed, the LTBI treatment uptake can be higher.

Integrating hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV screening into tuberculosis entry screening for migrants in the Netherlands, 2013 to 2015.

We evaluated uptake and diagnostic outcomes of voluntary hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) screening offered during routine tuberculosis entry screening to migrants in Gelderland and Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2013 and 2015. In Amsterdam, HIV screening was also offered. Overall, 54% (461/859) accepted screening. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection (HBsAg-positive) and HCV exposure (anti-HCV-positive) in Gelderland was 4.48% (9/201; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-8.29) and 0.99% (2/203; 95% CI: 0.27-3.52), respectively, all infections were newly diagnosed. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection, HCV exposure and chronic HCV infection (HCV RNA-positive) in Amsterdam was 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), 1.17% (3/256; 95% CI: 0.40-3.39) and 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), respectively, with all chronic HBV/HCV infections previously diagnosed. No HIV infections were found. In univariate analyses, newly diagnosed chronic HBV infection was more likely in participants migrating for reasons other than work or study (4.35% vs 0.83%; odds ratio (OR) = 5.45; 95% CI: 1.12-26.60) and was less likely in participants in Amsterdam than Gelderland (0.00% vs 4.48%; OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.69). Regional differences in HBV prevalence might be explained by differences in the populations entering compulsory tuberculosis screening. Prescreening selection of migrants based on risk factors merits further exploration.

Risk of tuberculosis after recent exposure. A 10-year follow-up study of contacts in Amsterdam.

RATIONALE: The lifetime risk of tuberculosis (TB) for infected contacts is often mentioned to be 5-10%, but these estimates are based on studies conducted decades ago, and thus may not reflect current epidemiologic conditions. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of TB among contacts with evidence of infection and to compare this with estimates often stated in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using records on contacts of pulmonary TB patients at the Public Health Service Amsterdam, 2002-2011. The Public Health Service Amsterdam TB electronic registration system identified TB cases during follow-up until October 2012; these were defined as coprevalent if diagnosed less than or equal to 180 days and incident if diagnosed greater than 180 days after TB diagnosis of index patient. Cumulative TB risk was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 9,332 contacts of pulmonary TB patients, 4,774 were screened for latent TB infection (LTBI) of whom 739 (16%) had evidence of infection. Among these the 5-year Kaplan-Meier TB cumulative risk was 9.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.5-11.9). This varied by age: 33.3% of 36 contacts aged less than 5 years, 19.1% of 84 contacts aged 5-14 years, and 6.7% of 619 contacts aged greater than or equal to 15 years (log rank, P < 0.001). Of 739 contacts with evidence of infection, 57 had coprevalent TB and 14 developed incident TB. Of patients without coprevalent TB but with LTBI diagnosis, 45% received preventive therapy. Five-year risk of incident TB was 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.7) among contacts with LTBI who did not start preventive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year risk of TB among contacts with evidence of infection was higher compared with older estimates, and differed considerably by age. Incidence of TB among contacts with LTBI was low, suggesting limited impact may be expected of expanding preventive therapy.

Yield of tuberculosis contact investigations in Amsterdam: opportunities for improvement.

We aimed to determine the coverage and yield of tuberculosis contact investigation, and compliance with guidelines, and to identify opportunities for improvement. Data were extracted from records on contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients at the Public Health Service (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) from 2008 to 2011. Additional data were obtained from the national tuberculosis register. Among 3743 contacts of 235 pulmonary tuberculosis index patients, 2337 (62%) were screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Those less likely to be screened for LTBI included contacts of sputum smear-negative index patients (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) and bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG)-vaccinated contacts (aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04-0.09). Among BCG-vaccinated contacts, the proportion screened increased from 9% in 2008 to 43% in 2011 (p-value for trend <0.001). LTBI diagnosis among contacts screened was associated with non-Dutch nationality (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.1) and being a close contact (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 1.9-8.3). Of the 254 contacts with LTBI diagnosis, 142 (56%) started preventive treatment. Starting treatment was associated with Dutch nationality (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.4) and being a close contact (aOR 10.5, 95% CI 1.5-70.7). Treatment completion was achieved by 129 (91%) of the 142 contacts who started treatment. Two areas for improvement were identified: further expanding LTBI screening, particularly among BCG-vaccinated contacts and contacts of sputum smear-negative index patients, and expanding preventive treatment among contacts with LTBI.

Missed opportunities in tuberculosis control in The Netherlands due to prioritization of contact investigations.

BACKGROUND: The Dutch contact investigation guidelines stipulate that Public Health Services should examine contacts around all pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients to prevent disease and further transmission. Our objective was to assess to what extent these guidelines were applied and whether patient characteristics were associated with having contacts investigated. METHODS: We extracted the records of all reported pulmonary TB patients from the nationwide surveillance register covering 2006-07. Patient characteristics associated with having contacts investigated were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 1236 pulmonary TB patients reported, 909 (74%) patients were eligible for analysis, since 133 (11%) patients had incomplete records and 194 (16%) patients were registered by Public Health Services who did not report contact investigation results. For 710 (78%) out of the 909 patients contacts were investigated. Compared with Dutch patients, contacts were significantly less often investigated around immigrant patients (84 vs. 75%, OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.40-0.92). Contacts were significantly more often investigated for smear positive patients (OR: 3.52; 95% CI: 2.23-5.55) and culture positive patients (OR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.76-4.16), compared with smear negative and culture negative patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Initiating contact investigations appear to be prioritized based on the infectiousness, but also on the ethnicity of pulmonary TB patients. By not investigating the contacts of 25% of the immigrant patients, there is a risk of missing a significant number of infected and diseased contacts, since the incidence in this group is markedly higher than in the Dutch population.