ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in utilization across health care settings among children by body mass index (BMI) categories to help identify opportunities for interventions. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using 1 year of electronic health records following an index primary care visit for children 3 to 17 years old in 2016. Index visits occurred at >40 pediatric practices affiliated with a Northeastern health system. Using normal BMI as a reference group, we examined the extent to which children's BMI percentile categories were associated with primary care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and ED visit acuity. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were used as covariates. RESULTS: Of those with biologically plausible values for height and weight (n = 30,352), the prevalences of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity were 16.3%, 12.4%, and 5.7%, respectively. Children outside of the normal BMI range made more primary care visits; however, relative patterns of ED utilization were not consistent. Children with obesity versus normal BMI were less likely to have ED visits of high acuity. Risk of hospitalization was higher among children with overweight or severe obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Children's BMI categories were associated with health care utilization, specifically primary care visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations. Further investigation is needed to explore the drivers of these differences in utilization, such as the impact of stigma and perceived weight bias on care-seeking patterns, and to examine the role of settings outside of primary care in pediatric weight management.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Overweight , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Overweight/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Of the 40 million people globally in need of palliative care (PC), just 14% receive it, predominantly in high-income countries. Within fragile health systems that lack PC, incurable illness is often marked by pain and suffering, as well as burdensome costs. In high-income settings, PC decreases healthcare utilisation, thus enhancing value. Similar cost-effectiveness models are lacking in low-income and middle-income countries and with them, the impetus and funding to expand PC delivery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of seven databases to gather evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PC in low-income and middle-income countries. We extracted and synthesised palliative outcomes and economic data from original research studies occurring in low-income and middle-income countries. This review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and includes a quality appraisal. RESULTS: Our search identified 10 eligible papers that included palliative and economic outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Four provided true cost-effectiveness analyses in comparing the costs of PC versus alternative care, with PC offering cost savings, favourable palliative outcomes and positive patient-reported and family-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of included studies, wide variety of study types and lack of high-quality studies, several patterns emerged: (1) low-cost PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries is possible, (2) patient-reported outcomes are favourable and (3) PC is less costly than the alternative. This review highlights the extraordinary need for robust cost-effectiveness analysis of PC in low-income and middle-income countries in order to develop health economic models for the delivery of PC, direct resource allocation and guide healthcare policy for PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing/economics , Palliative Care/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the optimal use of shared decision making (SDM) to guide palliative and end-of-life decisions in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to convene a working group to develop a set of research questions that, when answered, will substantially advance the ability of clinicians to use SDM to guide palliative and end-of-life care decisions in the ED. METHODS: Participants were identified based on expertise in emergency, palliative, or geriatrics care; policy or patient-advocacy; and spanned physician, nursing, social work, legal, and patient perspectives. Input from the group was elicited using a time-staggered Delphi process including three teleconferences, an open platform for asynchronous input, and an in-person meeting to obtain a final round of input from all members and to identify and resolve or describe areas of disagreement. CONCLUSION: Key research questions identified by the group related to which ED patients are likely to benefit from palliative care (PC), what interventions can most effectively promote PC in the ED, what outcomes are most appropriate to assess the impact of these interventions, what is the potential for initiating advance care planning in the ED to help patients define long-term goals of care, and what policies influence palliative and end-of-life care decision making in the ED. Answers to these questions have the potential to substantially improve the quality of care for ED patients with advanced illness.
Subject(s)
Decision Making , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Advance Care Planning , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Patient Care Planning , PolicyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Variation in emergency physician computed tomography (CT) imaging utilization is well described, but little is known about what drives it. Physician empathy has been proposed as a potential characteristic affecting CT utilization. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe empathy in a cohort of emergency physicians and evaluate its association with CT utilization. We also sought to compare emergency physician performance on an empathy psychometric test with performance on other psychometric tests previously proposed as predictors of CT utilization. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included two parts: 1) a secondary analysis of emergency department (ED) CT imaging utilization data in a large health system from July 2013 to June 2014 and 2) a survey study of the cohort of physicians responsible for this imaging using four psychometric scales: the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), a risk-taking subset of the Jackson Personality Index (RTS), the Stress from Uncertainty Scale (SUS), and the Malpractice Fear Scale (MFS). The study included data and physicians from four EDs: one urban, academic ED, two community, and one free-standing. A hierarchical, mixed-effects regression model was used to evaluate the association between emergency physician performance on the four scales and risk-adjusted CT imaging utilization. The model incorporated physician-specific CT utilization rates adjusted for propensity scores that were calculated using over 500 patient-level variables via random forest methods, physician demographics, and a random provider effect to account for the clustering of observations. RESULTS: CT variation analysis included 113,517 patients seen during the study period by the 74 eligible emergency physician survey respondents; 20,972 (18.5%) of these patients had at least one CT. The survey response rate was 74 of 82 (90.2%). Correlation coefficients between JSE and the other scales were not statistically significant. In subset analysis, there was a trend toward a physician's number of years in practice and RTS score contributing to CT utilization for traumatic head CT. There were no significant associations between performance on any of the psychometric scales and CT utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Performance on the JSE, RTS, SUS, or MFS was not predictive of risk-adjusted CT utilization in the ED. The underlying physician-based factors that mediate interphysician variation remain to be clearly identified.
Subject(s)
Empathy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electronic Health Records , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Malpractice , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis , Risk-TakingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We compare estimated blood loss (EBL) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between patients receiving transoral greater palatine canal (GPC) and transnasal infiltration (combined group) to patients receiving only transnasal infiltration (control group). CT stage, endoscopic stage, revision surgery, presence of polyps, degree of resident involvement, and operative time (OT) are also evaluated. METHODS: Injection with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was performed through the GPC and transnasally in the "combined" study group (20 patients) and only transnasally in the control group (22 patients). Charts, operative reports, and CT scans were reviewed and demographic data as well as pertinent information collected. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). RESULTS: Twelve females and 8 males underwent combined injections and 16 males and 6 females received transnasal injections only. Average ratio of EBL to OT was 2.9 mL/min for the combined group and 4.1 mL/min for the control group (p=0.05). Presence of polyps and revision surgery lead to a statistically significantly higher EBL (p<0.05). Increased EBL and OT were noted with higher endoscopic and CT stages. No complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Increased endoscopic and CT stages, presence of polyps, and revision surgery may all lead to greater EBL in ESS. Although there was a trend towards decreased EBL in the combined group, this however did not reach statistical significance. Combined injection through the GPC and nasal cavity appears to be a safe method to decrease EBL during ESS.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Endoscopy , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, Local , Female , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
To distinguish age-related memory loss more explicitly from Alzheimer's disease (AD), we have explored its molecular underpinning in the dentate gyrus (DG), a subregion of the hippocampal formation thought to be targeted by aging. We carried out a gene expression study in human postmortem tissue harvested from both DG and entorhinal cortex (EC), a neighboring subregion unaffected by aging and known to be the site of onset of AD. Using expression in the EC for normalization, we identified 17 genes that manifested reliable age-related changes in the DG. The most significant change was an age-related decline in RbAp48, a histone-binding protein that modifies histone acetylation. To test whether the RbAp48 decline could be responsible for age-related memory loss, we turned to mice and found that, consistent with humans, RbAp48 was less abundant in the DG of old than in young mice. We next generated a transgenic mouse that expressed a dominant-negative inhibitor of RbAp48 in the adult forebrain. Inhibition of RbAp48 in young mice caused hippocampus-dependent memory deficits similar to those associated with aging, as measured by novel object recognition and Morris water maze tests. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies showed that within the hippocampal formation, dysfunction was selectively observed in the DG, and this corresponded to a regionally selective decrease in histone acetylation. Up-regulation of RbAp48 in the DG of aged wild-type mice ameliorated age-related hippocampus-based memory loss and age-related abnormalities in histone acetylation. Together, these findings show that the DG is a hippocampal subregion targeted by aging, and identify molecular mechanisms of cognitive aging that could serve as valid targets for therapeutic intervention.
Subject(s)
Histones/metabolism , Memory Disorders/metabolism , Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4/metabolism , Acetylation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/metabolism , Aging/pathology , Animals , Dentate Gyrus/metabolism , Dentate Gyrus/pathology , Dentate Gyrus/physiopathology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genes, Dominant/genetics , Histone Acetyltransferases/metabolism , Humans , Male , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Memory Disorders/physiopathology , Mice , Middle Aged , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Organ Specificity/genetics , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Protein Binding , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4/deficiency , Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4/geneticsABSTRACT
Advances in endoscopic skull base (SB) surgery have led to the resection of increasingly larger cranial base lesions, resulting in large SB defects. These defects have initially led to increased postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. The development of the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) has successfully reduced postoperative CSF leaks. Mucocele formation, however, has been reported as a complication of this technique. In this study, we analyze the incidence of mucocele formation after repair of SB defects using a PNSF. A retrospective review was performed from December 2008 to December 2011 to identify patients who underwent PNSF reconstruction for large ventral SB defects. Demographic data, defect site, incidence of postoperative CSF leaks, and rate of mucocele formation were collected. Seventy patients undergoing PNSF repair of SB defects were identified. No postoperative mucocele formation was noted at an average radiological follow-up of 11.7 months (range, 3-36.9 months) and clinical follow-up of 13.8 months (range, 3-38.9 months), making the overall mucocele rate 0%. The postoperative CSF leak rate was 2.9%. Proper closure of SB defects is crucial to prevent CSF leaks. The PNSF is an efficient technique for these repairs. Although this flap may carry an inherent risk of mucocele formation when placed over mucosalized bone during repair, we found that meticulous and strategic removal of mucosa from the site of flap placement resulted in a 0% incidence of postoperative mucocele formation in our cohort.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The number of women in medicine has increased considerably over the past 3 decades, and they now comprise approximately half of medical school matriculants. We examine whether gender disparities in research productivity are present throughout various specialties and compare these findings to those previously described among otolaryngologists. STUDY DESIGN: Bibliometric analysis. METHODS: Research productivity, measured by the h-index, was calculated for 9,952 academic physicians representing 34 medical specialties. Additionally, trends in how rate of research productivity changed throughout different career stages were compared. RESULTS: Women were underrepresented at the level of professor and in positions of departmental leadership relative to their representation among assistant and associate professors. Male faculty had statistically higher research productivity both overall (H = 10.3 ± 0.14 vs. 5.6 ± 0.14) and at all academic ranks. For the overall sample, men and women appeared to have equivalent rates of research productivity. In internal medicine, men had higher early-career productivity, while female faculty had productivity equaling and even surpassing that of their male colleagues beyond 20 to 25 years. Men and women had equivalent productivity in surgical specialties throughout their careers, and similar rates in pediatrics until 25 to 30 years. CONCLUSIONS: Female academic physicians have decreased research productivity relative to men, which may be one factor contributing to their underrepresentation at the level of professor and departmental leader relative to their proportions in junior academic ranks. Potential explanations may include fewer woman physicians in the age groups during which higher academic ranks are attained, greater family responsibilities, and greater involvement in clinical service and educational contributions.
Subject(s)
Career Mobility , Efficiency , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Female , Humans , Male , Research , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender differences in NIH funding among faculty in otolaryngology departments and discuss potential reasons for these differences. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of NIH funding data available on the online NIH RePORTER system. METHODS: Fiscal year 2011 and 2012 NIH funding awards to principal investigators (PIs) in otolaryngology departments were obtained and used to examine faculty listings from otolaryngology departments for academic rank and gender. The Scopus database was used to determine publication range of these faculty members. RESULTS: Individual mean NIH awards to men ($362,946 ± $21,247 standard error of mean) were higher than those to women ($287,188 ± $38,029). Male PIs were found to have higher mean NIH funding totals (aggregating grants for PIs with multiple awards) than female PIs ($498,593 vs $359,276). Upon organization by academic rank and years active, men had significantly higher funding levels at both the level of assistant professor and at 10 to 20 years of experience. Of all NIH grants awarded, men had a higher percentage of the more prestigious R-series grants (76.2%) than did women (63.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Male faculty members have higher NIH funding levels than their female colleagues, a disparity that exists separate from career longevity, as it is true both at the rank of assistant professor and for those with 10 to 20 years of research experience. The larger proportion of R-series NIH grants awarded to male faculty may contribute to this finding. This discrepancy in percentage and dollars of funding exists despite the increasing percentages of women in higher ranks.
Subject(s)
Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Otolaryngology/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Otolaryngology/economics , Otolaryngology/education , Radiology Department, Hospital/economics , Radiology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic/economics , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
Urticaria multiforme is a benign cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction seen in pediatric patients that is characterized by the acute and transient onset of blanchable, annular, polycyclic, erythematous wheals with dusky, ecchymotic centers in association with acral edema. It is most commonly misdiagnosed as erythema multiforme, a serum-sickness-like reaction, or urticarial vasculitis. Since these three diagnoses represent distinct clinical entities with unique prognoses and management strategies, it is important that physicians distinguish urticaria multiforme from its clinical mimics in order to optimize patient care. By performing a thorough history and physical examination, the astute clinician can make the correct diagnosis and develop an appropriate, effective treatment plan while avoiding unnecessary biopsies and laboratory evaluations. The authors report a case of urticaria multiforme in a four-year-old girl in order to emphasize the distinctive morphological manifestations of this rare, albeit unique, disease seen in the pediatric population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The potentially severe complications resulting from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak makes iatrogenic injury a medicolegal area of concern for otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons. The objectives of this analysis were to study legal outcomes as well as medical and nonmedical elements affecting malpractice litigation. METHODS: Public court records available in the Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) were searched for medical malpractice litigation related to iatrogenic CSF leak. Of the 18 jury verdicts and settlements included, outcomes and awards, patient demographic data, and other factors instrumental in determining legal responsibility were recorded for comparison. RESULTS: Ten (55.6%) cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, 2 (11.1%) resulted in damages awarded by a jury, and 6 (33.3%) were settled out of court before resolution of trial. Mean damages awarded were $1.1 million, while out of court settlements averaged $966,887. Malpractice stemming from patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery comprised 77.8% of cases analyzed. The most frequent alleged factors cited for litigation included having to undergo additional surgery (88.9%), developing meningitis (50.0%), and failing to recognize complications in a timely manner (44.4%). Perceived deficits in informed consent were alleged in one-third of cases. CONCLUSION: Although a slight majority of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, payments made were considerable, averaging approximately $1 million. Strategies to decrease liability and allow patients to make more informed decisions should include clear communication with patients that explicitly states potential risks, such as meningitis, and possible need to undergo additional reparative surgery.
Subject(s)
Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea/etiology , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Endoscopy/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Otolaryngology/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak , Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea/prevention & control , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Liability, Legal/economics , Male , Malpractice/economics , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we detailed factors governing legal outcomes in iatrogenic orbital injury, with the purpose of discussing strategies to minimize liability and enhance patient safety. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: Jury verdict and settlement reports were searched from publically available federal and state court records using the Westlaw database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY). After exclusion of nonrelevant cases, 20 cases of iatrogenic orbital injuries were examined for factors such as legal outcome, damages awarded, defendant specialty, alleged causes of malpractice, and patient demographic information. RESULTS: The majority (60.0%) of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor. Payment was considerable for the cases decided in support of the plaintiff, averaging $1.13 million. Out-of-court settlements averaged $1.78 million (range, $487,500-$3.9 million), whereas jury-awarded damages averaged $472,661 (range, $75,000-$763,214). Complications stemming from endoscopic sinus surgery were most common (50.0%). Diplopia was the most common medical complaint (50.0%), whereas permanent deficits and having to undergo additional surgery were each present in 65.0% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for permanent sequelae of iatrogenic orbital injury makes this complication susceptible to malpractice litigation. Otolaryngologists were the most common defendants. Although cases were resolved in the defendant's favor 60% of the time, payments made were considerable, averaging $1.13 million. Steps to minimize liability and improve patient safety include an informed consent process explicitly listing risks, including diplopia and blindness, and obtaining timely ophthalmology consultation when a complication is recognized.
Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Liability, Legal , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Orbit/injuries , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/economics , Incidence , Male , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Otolaryngology/legislation & jurisprudence , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The h-index, a bibliometric indicator that objectively characterizes the impact of an author's scholarship, is an effective tool that may be considered by academic departments for decisions related to hiring and faculty advancement. Our objective was to characterize the scholarly productivity of academic surgeons from different specialties relative to otolaryngologists. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of a bibliometric database. METHODS: The h-indices of 2,429 faculty members within surgical specialties at 20 randomly selected academic institutions were calculated using the Scopus database and were examined to determine relationship with academic rank and comparison among surgical subspecialties. RESULTS: The h-index statistically increased with academic rank. Mean h-indices were as follows: assistant professor, 4.37 (range, 2.73-6.69); associate professor, 8.70 (6.53-11.02); professor, 16.44 (13.39-20.45); and chairperson, 20.79 (14.81-27.89). Mean increase between academic rank was 5.47, with the largest increase between the levels of associate professor and professor. Further examination demonstrated statistically significant increases through all academic ranks for most, but not all, individual specialties. Urologists, general surgeons, and neurosurgeons had the highest mean h-indices. CONCLUSIONS: h-indices among the different surgical specialties vary and are potentially impacted by the number of practitioners as well as research emphasis within a field. The mean h-index of academic otolaryngologists falls in the lower values for academic surgeons. Because this metric varies among different fields, it is most relevant for comparison when examining values within a field. H-indices reliably increase with increasing academic rank through professor and offer a quantifiable and objective alternative to other metrics when evaluating faculty members for academic advancement.
Subject(s)
Journal Impact Factor , Otolaryngology , Specialties, Surgical , Authorship , Bibliometrics , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Medicolegal factors contribute to increasing healthcare costs through the direct costs of malpractice litigation, malpractice insurance premiums, and defensive medicine. Malpractice litigation trends are constantly changing as a result of technological innovations and changes in laws. In this study, we examine the most recent legal decisions related to Otolaryngology and characterize the factors responsible for determining legal responsibility. METHODS: The Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was used to search for jury verdicts since 2008 in Otolaryngology malpractice cases. The 44 cases included in this analysis were studied to determine the procedures most commonly litigated and progressing to trial, as well as the year, location, alleged cause of malpractice, specialty of co-defendants, and case outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 44 cases included in this analysis, physicians were not found liable in 36 (81.8%) cases. Rhinologic procedures comprised 38.6% of cases litigated, and rulings were in physicians' favor in 66.7% of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) cases and all non-ESS rhinologic cases. A perceived lack of informed consent was noted in 34.1% of cases. The 8 jury awards averaged $940,000 (range, $148,000-$3,600,000). CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists were not found liable in the majority of cases reviewed. Rhinologic surgeries were the most common procedures resulting in litigation. Adenotonsillectomies, thyroidectomies, and airway management are also well-represented. Perceived deficits in informed consent and misdiagnosis were noted in a considerable proportion of otolaryngologic malpractice cases resulting in jury decisions.
Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Otolaryngology , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Databases, Factual , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Liability, Legal , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The potential for adverse events with lasting functional effects makes cranial nerve (CN) injury a target for litigation. Our objective was to comprehensively examine records of malpractice trials and detail issues influencing outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: The Westlaw database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was searched for jury verdict reports related to medical malpractice and CN injury. After excluding nonrelevant cases, we examined 209 trials for characteristics including nerve(s) injured, alleged causes of malpractice, demographic information, specialty, and outcome. RESULTS: The most commonly litigated CNs were VII (24.4%) and II (19.6%). Sixty-nine (33.0%) trials resulted in damages awarded. Outcomes varied, ranging from a 29.2% plaintiff success rate for CN XI injury to 48.4% for CN II injury. Plaintiffs had less success with increasing age. Average damages awarded were $1.7 million. The most commonly named defendants were otolaryngologists and general surgeons. Individual considerations varied but commonly included alleged deficits in informed consent (25.4%), unnecessary procedures (14.8%), undergoing additional surgery (25.8%), and untimely recognition of complications (23.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice trials were resolved in the defendant's favor the majority of the time. In cases where plaintiffs were successful, however, awards were considerable, averaging nearly $2 million. Factors influencing case outcome included age, location, perceived deficits in informed consent, allegedly unnecessary surgery, requiring additional surgery to repair a complication, and untimely recognition of complications. Although specific factors should be taken into consideration with each procedure, providing detailed informed consent and communicating with patients regarding expectations may minimize liability.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Cranial Nerve Injuries/therapy , Liability, Legal , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Sinonasal hemangiomas, although rare, must be considered in the evaluation of intranasal masses with profuse epistaxis. Although the availability of literature discussing cavernous hemangiomas in this location is limited, there have been no case reports of exclusively soft tissue sinonasal cavernous hemangiomas extending to the anterior skull base (ASB) that were resected purely endoscopically. Here, we describe the successful endoscopic resection of an extensive right sinonasal cavernous hemangioma extending to but not invading the ASB. Although highly vascular, in select cases, these tumors can be successfully resected endoscopically without embolization by experienced endoscopic sinus and skull base surgeons.