Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 29(11): 5999-6008, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31089847

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was conducted in order to assess the intra- and interoperator reproducibility of shear-wave speed (SWS) measurement on elasticity phantoms and healthy volunteers using ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board. Two operators measured the SWS of five elasticity phantoms and seven organs (thyroid, lymph node, muscle, spleen, kidney, pancreas, and liver) of 30 healthy volunteers with 1.0-4.5 MHz convex (4C1) and 4.0-9.0 MHz linear (9L4) transducers. The phantom measurements were repeated ten times, while the volunteer measurements were performed five times each. Intra- and interoperator reproducibility was assessed. Interoperator reproducibility was also evaluated with the 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA). RESULTS: In phantoms, all intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were above 0.90 and the 95% LOA between the two operators were less than ± 18%. In volunteers, intraoperator ICCs were > 0.75 for all regions except the pancreas. Interoperator ICC was above 0.75 for the right lobe of the liver (depth 4 cm) and the kidney, but the 95% LOA was less than ± 25% only for the liver. CONCLUSION: Although excellent in phantoms, interoperator reproducibility was insufficient for all regions in the volunteers other than the right hepatic lobe at a depth of 4 cm. Clinicians should be aware of the 95% LOA when using SWS in patients. KEY POINTS: • Our phantom study indicated a high reproducibility for shear-wave speed (SWS) measurements with point shear-wave elastography (pSWE). • In volunteers, intraoperator reproducibility was generally high, but the interoperator reproducibility was not high enough except for the right hepatic lobe at 4 cm depth. • To evaluate interoperator reproducibility, the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between operators should be considered in addition to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/standards , Adult , Elasticity , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Observer Variation , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Transducers , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
2.
BMJ Open ; 7(1): e013925, 2017 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare shear-wave speed (SWS) measured by ultrasound-based point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) and MR elastography (MRE) on phantoms with a known shear modulus, and to assess method validity and variability. METHODS: 5 homogeneous phantoms of different stiffnesses were made. Shear modulus was measured by a rheometer, and this value was used as the standard. 10 SWS measurements were obtained at 4 different depths with 1.0-4.5 MHz convex (4C1) and 4.0-9.0 MHz linear (9L4) transducers using pSWE. MRE was carried out once per phantom, and SWSs at 5 different depths were obtained. These SWSs were then compared with those from a rheometer using linear regression analyses. RESULTS: SWSs obtained with both pSWE as well as MRE had a strong correlation with those obtained by a rheometer (R2>0.97). The relative difference in SWS between the procedures was from -25.2% to 25.6% for all phantoms, and from -8.1% to 6.9% when the softest and hardest phantoms were excluded. Depth dependency was noted in the 9L4 transducer of pSWE and MRE. CONCLUSIONS: SWSs from pSWE and MRE showed a good correlation with a rheometer-determined SWS. Although based on phantom studies, SWSs obtained with these methods are not always equivalent, the measurement can be thought of as reliable and these SWSs were reasonably close to each other for the middle range of stiffness within the measurable range.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/instrumentation , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Elastic Modulus , Reproducibility of Results , Rheology , Shear Strength , Sound , Transducers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL