Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product improves robustness of equine gut microbiome upon stress.

Introduction: Nutritional and environmental stressors can disturb the gut microbiome of horses which may ultimately decrease their health and performance. We hypothesized that supplementation with a yeast-derived postbiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product-SCFP) would benefit horses undergoing an established model of stress due to prolonged transportation. Methods: Quarter horses (n = 20) were blocked based on sex, age (22 ± 3 mo) and body weight (439 ± 3 kg) and randomized to receive either a basal diet of 60% hay and 40% concentrate (CON) or the basal diet supplemented with 21 g/d Diamond V TruEquine C (SCFP; Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) for 60 days. On day 57, horses were tethered with their heads elevated 35cm above wither height for 12 h to induce mild upper respiratory tract inflammation. Fecal samples were collected at days 0, 28, and 56 before induction of stress, and at 0, 12, 24, and 72 h post-stress and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun metagenomics. Within sample (alpha) diversity was evaluated by fitting a linear model and between sample (beta) diversity was tested with permutational ANOVA. Results: The SCFP stabilized alpha diversity across all time points, whereas CON horses had more fluctuation (P < 0.05) at 12, 24, and 72 h post-challenge compared to d 56. A significant difference between CON and SCFP was observed at 0 and 12 h. There was no difference in beta-diversity between SCFP and CON on d 56. Discussion: Taken together, these observations led us to conclude that treatment with SCFP resulted in more robust and stable microbial profiles in horses after stress challenge.

Mechanisms of peptide sex pheromone regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis.

In many gram positive bacteria, horizontal transfer and virulence are regulated by peptide-mediated cell-cell signaling. The heptapeptide cCF10 (C) activates conjugative transfer of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10, whereas the iCF10 (I) peptide inhibits transfer. Both peptides bind to the same domain of the master transcription regulator PrgX, a repressor of transcription of the prgQ operon encoding conjugation genes. We show that repression of prgQ by PrgX tetramers requires formation of a pCF10 DNA loop where each of two PrgX DNA-binding sites is occupied by a dimer. I binding to PrgX enhances prgQ repression, while C binding has the opposite effect. Previous models suggested that differential effects of these two peptides on the PrgX oligomerization state accounted for their distinct functions. Our new results demonstrate that both peptides have similar, high-binding affinity for PrgX, and that both peptides actually promote formation of PrgX tetramers with higher DNA-binding affinity than Apo-PrgX. We propose that differences in repression ability of PrgX/peptide complexes result from subtle differences in the structures of DNA-bound PrgX/peptide complexes. Changes in the induction state of a donor cell likely results from replacement of one type of DNA-bound peptide/PrgX tetramer with the other.

Analysis of the amino acid sequence specificity determinants of the enterococcal cCF10 sex pheromone in interactions with the pheromone-sensing machinery.

The level of expression of conjugation genes in Enterococcus faecalis strains carrying the pheromone-responsive transferable plasmid pCF10 is determined by the ratio in the culture medium of two types of signaling peptides, a pheromone (cCF10) and an inhibitor (iCF10). Recent data have demonstrated that both peptides target the cytoplasmic receptor protein PrgX. However, the relative importance of the interaction of these peptides with the pCF10 protein PrgZ (which enhances import of cCF10) versus PrgX is not fully understood, and there is relatively little information about specific amino acid sequence determinants affecting the functional interactions of cCF10 with these proteins in vivo. To address these issues, we used a pheromone-inducible reporter gene system where various combinations of PrgX and PrgZ could be expressed in an isogenic host background to examine the biological activities of cCF10, iCF10, and variants of cCF10 isolated in a genetic screen. The results suggest that most of the amino acid sequence determinants of cCF10 pheromone activity affect interactions between the peptide and PrgX, although some sequence variants that affected peptide/PrgZ interactions were also identified. The results provide functional data to complement ongoing structural studies of PrgX and increase our understanding of the functional interactions of cCF10 and iCF10 with the pheromone-sensing machinery of pCF10.

Molecular basis for control of conjugation by bacterial pheromone and inhibitor peptides.

In many bacteria expression of lateral gene transfer and of virulence factors is controlled by cell-cell signalling systems. Molecular interactions of microbial signal molecules with their cognate receptors are not well understood. For the Enterococcus faecalis conjugative plasmid pCF10, the PrgX protein serves as a molecular switch controlling expression of conjugation and virulence genes encoded by the plasmid. The induction state of a pCF10-carrying donor cell is determined by the ratio of two signalling peptides, cCF10 pheromone and iCF10 inhibitor. Recent analysis of PrgX/cCF10 interactions suggests a mechanism for conversion to the induced state. However, the means by which iCF10 peptide antagonizes cCF10 activity is unclear, and it has been suggested that inhibitor peptides block import of pheromone peptides. We now show that both of these peptides interact with the same binding pocket of PrgX, but they differentially alter the conformation of the protein and its oligomerization state, resulting in opposing biological activities.

Pheromone-inducible conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis: a model for the evolution of biological complexity?

Pheromone-inducible transfer of the plasmid pCF10 in Enterococcus faecalis is regulated using a complicated network of proteins and RNAs. The plasmid itself has been assembled from parts garnered from a variety of sources, and many aspects of the system resemble a biological kluge. Recently several new functions of various pCF10 gene products that participate in regulation of plasmid transfer have been identified. The results indicate that selective pressures controlling the evolution of the plasmid have produced a highly complex regulatory network with multiple biological functions that may serve well as a model for the evolution of biological complexity.

Structure of peptide sex pheromone receptor PrgX and PrgX/pheromone complexes and regulation of conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis.

Many bacterial activities, including expression of virulence factors, horizontal genetic transfer, and production of antibiotics, are controlled by intercellular signaling using small molecules. To date, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of peptide-mediated cell-cell signaling has been limited by a dearth of published information about the molecular structures of the signaling components. Here, we present the molecular structure of PrgX, a DNA- and peptide-binding protein that regulates expression of the conjugative transfer genes of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10 in response to an intercellular peptide pheromone signal. Comparison of the structures of PrgX and the PrgX/pheromone complex suggests that pheromone binding destabilizes PrgX tetramers, opening a 70-bp pCF10 DNA loop required for conjugation repression.

Enterococcus faecalis pheromone-responsive protein PrgX: genetic separation of positive autoregulatory functions from those involved in negative regulation of conjugative plasmid transfer.

The pCF10 plasmid in Enterococcus faecalis transfers from donor cells to recipients upon induction via peptide pheromone. Two plasmid-encoded negative regulators produced from the same transcript, PrgX protein and Qa RNA, repress conjugation genes in uninduced donor cells. PrgX positively autoregulates production of both itself and mature Qa RNA, and is believed to repress the prgQ promoter in a pheromone-sensitive fashion. Previous analysis of PrgX was complicated because mutations in prgX affecting regulation of conjugation also disrupted PrgX autoregulation, suggesting the two functions might be inseparable. In this study, we isolated 14 single amino acid substitutions in PrgX that reduced or eliminated repression of prgQ, without affecting autoregulation or DNA binding. PrgX was shown to bind to its cognate pheromone, cCF10, and most of the mutations lowered the affinity of PrgX for cCF10. Dimerization was affected by five of the mutations and the data indicate that it is required, but insufficient for pheromone induction. We propose a new model for the mechanism used by PrgX for regulation of the prgQ promoter, PrgX autoregulation, and Qa RNA processing.

Characterization of cis-acting prgQ mutants: evidence for two distinct repression mechanisms by Qa RNA and PrgX protein in pheromone-inducible enterococcal plasmid pCF10.

The pCF10-encoded negative regulators PrgX and Qa (prgQ antisense) RNA inhibit pCF10 transfer by blocking prgQ transcription extension past a potential transcription terminator sequence IRS1. To identify potential target sites for negative regulation, we isolated and analysed 13 cis-acting mutations in the prgXQ region. Determination of the 3' end of Qa RNA showed that eight mutations mapped in the region encoding Qa RNA. Four mutations were in the Qa promoter region and one was in IRS1. Three mutations in Qa greatly reduced the intracellular level of this RNA but did not affect that of PrgX. However, both Qa RNA and PrgX protein were reduced in three Qa promoter region mutants and the expression of prgQ transcripts extending 3' from IRS1 became constitutive. Qa RNA could mediate its negative regulatory activity in the absence of PrgX, and this activity was not abolished by cCF10, the peptide pheromone that induces pCF10 transfer. RNA analysis showed that Qa RNA abolished transcription readthrough. Based on the experimental data as well as computer analysis of predicted secondary structures of prgQ mRNA in the presence or absence of Qa, we concluded that Qa RNA is a pheromone-insensitive effector of prgQ mRNA termination or degradation at IRS1. In cells lacking a Qa target sequence, expression of PrgX repressed transcription from the prgQ promoter, and this repression was relieved by addition of exogenous cCF10. Thus, even though the synthesis of these negative regulators is coupled, they each act independently on separate targets to regulate expression of conjugation functions.