Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 89(6): 1787-94, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21606444

ABSTRACT

Sows subjected to prenatal stress have been found to produce offspring that have altered responses to stress. Our objective was to determine if exposing a sow to stress would alter the response of the offspring to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 2 mo of age or their response to mixing stress at 4 mo of age. Sow treatments consisted of intravenous injections of ACTH (1 IU/kg of BW), exposure to rough handling for a 10-min duration (rough), or no treatment (control) once per week from d 42 to 77 of gestation. At 2 mo of age, pigs from each treatment, 1 per litter (n = 21, 17, and 15 for the ACTH, rough, and control treatments, respectively), were challenged with 2 µg of LPS/kg of BW or saline, or served as a noninjected control. Their behavioral response to a human approach test and salivary cortisol were measured. At 4 mo of age, 1 pig from each treatment (n = 14, 14, and 15 for the ACTH, rough, and control treatments, respectively) was taken from its home pen and placed in a pen of unfamiliar pigs. At this time, a punch biopsy wound (6 × 6 mm) was created to measure the ability of the pig to heal the wound. At this same time, each pig received a 1-mL intramuscular injection of 20% ovine red blood cells (oRBC), and then a second injection of oRBC at 21 d postmixing. Blood samples were collected 3 times per week for 2 wk and then once a week for 4 more weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for cortisol, porcine corticosteroid-binding globulin, antibody response to oRBC, and nitric oxide production by macrophages. Behavior was recorded during the first 5 d after mixing. All pigs in the LPS challenge responded with characteristic sickness behavior; however, pigs in the rough treatment showed less sickness behavior than those in the other 2 treatments (P < 0.05). Maternal stress treatment did not affect (P < 0.43) salivary cortisol. Pigs from all treatments responded similarly to mixing stress with regard to cortisol, porcine corticosteroid-binding globulin, antibody titers, nitric oxide production, and hematology measures, and all pigs experienced the same amount of aggression in response to mixing. Without altering peripheral measures of stress responsivity, prenatal stress enhanced the ability of pigs to cope with a simulated immune challenge, which could prove to be an adaptation to challenging environments.


Subject(s)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/pharmacology , Lipopolysaccharides/toxicity , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/veterinary , Stress, Physiological/physiology , Swine/physiology , Animals , Female , Handling, Psychological , Male , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/metabolism , Stress, Physiological/drug effects
2.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ; 116(7): 413-22, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18484065

ABSTRACT

Prenatal stress can affect the offspring's behaviour, physiology, and immune parameters. This paper summarises and discusses experimental and field studies on prenatal maternal stress in pigs. Often, elevated maternal corticosteroid concentrations during gestation are used to model prenatal stress. We used prolonged oral administration of cortisol (hydrocortisone acetate, HCA) to pregnant sows, which resulted in elevated maternal plasma and salivary cortisol concentrations. This treatment induced elevated fetal basal and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-induced plasma cortisol concentrations, as demonstrated by a pilot study. Postnatally, it reduced birth weight of the piglets, and resulted in more live born piglets and higher preweaning mortality. In addition, it reduced the female offspring's salivary cortisol response to ACTH, and it enhanced the piglets' novelty-induced locomotion and vocalisations, and the piglets were more aggressive in a social test. Some of these effects depended on the period of gestation during which maternal cortisol concentrations were elevated, and on the sex of the offspring. These results demonstrate that piglet physiology and behaviour can indeed be affected when the mother has elevated cortisol concentrations during gestation. Regular mixing of pregnant sows with unfamiliar sows during the last third of gestation did not affect maternal salivary cortisol concentrations. Also, it did not affect the piglets' performance, behaviour, adrenocortical response to ACTH, or wound healing. Regular mixing of pregnant sows during the last third of gestation did not affect the piglets' characteristics as studied in these experiments. However, performance and behaviour of piglets were highly influenced by the social rank of their mother during gestation. Our studies have demonstrated that piglets can be affected by elevated maternal cortisol concentrations during fetal development and by social rank of the pregnant sow during gestation.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications/veterinary , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Animals , Birth Weight , Body Weight , Cattle , Female , Fetal Death/epidemiology , Fetal Death/veterinary , Litter Size , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Swine
3.
J Anim Sci ; 85(2): 420-9, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17235027

ABSTRACT

Previous studies on group housing of pregnant sows have mainly focused on reproduction, but we hypothesized that the social rank of pregnant sows housed in groups could also affect birth weight, growth, and behavior of their offspring. Therefore, in the present study, pregnant gilts and sows were housed in 15 different groups (n = 7 to 14 animals per group) from 4 d after AI until 1 wk before the expected farrowing date. All groups were fed by an electronically controlled sow feeding system that registered, on a 24-h basis, the time of first visit, number of feeding and non-feeding visits, and number of times succeeding another sow within 2 s. Only in the first 6 groups (n = 57 animals), agonistic interactions were observed continuously. The percentage of agonistic interactions won was highly correlated (r(s) = 0.90, P < 0.001) with the percentage of displacement success (DS) at the feeding station, which was calculated as: [the number of times succeeding another sow within 2 s/(the number of times succeeded by another sow within 2 s + the number of times succeeding another sow within 2 s)] x 100. This allowed us to classify all sows (n = 166) according to their DS: high-social ranking (HSR) sows had a DS >50% (n = 62) and low-social ranking (LSR) sows a DS <50% (n = 104). Body weights before AI did not differ between HSR and LSR sows, but HSR sows gained more BW during gestation, and lost more BW and back-fat during lactation (P < 0.001). Maternal salivary cortisol concentrations at 2, 7, and 13 wk after AI did not differ between HSR and LSR sows, nor did gestation length, litter size, or percentage of live born piglets. During a novel object (NO) test at 3 wk of age, HSR offspring moved and vocalized more than LSR offspring (P < 0.05). In addition, the latency time to touch the NO was shorter in HSR offspring (P < 0.05), and HSR males spent more time near the NO than LSR males (P < 0.01). At weaning, HSR offspring weighed more than LSR offspring (P < 0.05), and at slaughter HSR offspring had more lean meat than LSR offspring (P < 0.05). Results indicate that the social rank of the sow during gestation affects her own BW gain and loss as well as the growth and behavior of her offspring. Pig breeders that apply group housing for pregnant sows should pay attention to reducing competition around the feeding area, which may reduce aggression among the sows and minimize differences between HSR and LSR sows.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Social Dominance , Swine/physiology , Weight Gain/physiology , Agonistic Behavior/physiology , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Female , Housing, Animal/standards , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Male , Pregnancy , Saliva/chemistry , Weaning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL