Evaluation of appendectomy as a potential risk factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated enterocolitis.

Aims: The relationship between appendectomy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) enterocolitis was explored. Methods: Patients who began ICIs between July 2010 and September 2020 (n = 10,907) were included. The exposure group included patients with evidence of appendectomy prior to ICIs in operative notes (n = 380). The control group included patients with evidence of normal appendix in radiologic reports (n = 3602). ICI enterocolitis was defined as histopathologic evidence of colitis or enteritis attributed to ICIs. The association between appendectomy and ICI enterocolitis was characterized by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 248 patients (6.2%) developed ICI enterocolitis. The odds of ICI enterocolitis were similar among those with prior appendectomy and those without appendectomy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.49-1.36; p = 0.449). Conclusion: No association was found between prior appendectomy and ICI enterocolitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a form of cancer treatment that 'unleash the brakes' on the body's immune system. One common and sometimes serious side effect of this type of drug is gut inflammation. Studies have shown that appendectomy, or surgical removal of the appendix, lowers the risk of inflammatory bowel disease, which is another cause of gut inflammation. This research assessed whether appendectomy reduces the risk of gut inflammation caused by ICIs. Patients on ICIs for cancer with and without prior appendectomy were identified. The rates of gut inflammation caused by ICIs between these two groups were compared and the rates of this side effect were similar. This suggests that appendectomy does not reduce the risk of gut inflammation caused by ICIs.

Diagnostic accuracy of general dermatologists and supportive oncodermatologists for biopsied cutaneous immune-related adverse events.

PURPOSE: Supportive oncodermatology has been shown to improve several aspects of care for patients with cancer, but research showing improved diagnostic accuracy as a benefit of supportive oncodermatology is largely lacking. We thus aimed to evaluate different dermatologist groups' diagnostic accuracy for heterogenous cutaneous toxicities, using cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a test model. METHODS: Billing/requisition codes were used to identify patients who initiated programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) ICIs between 2010 and 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital and underwent a subsequent skin biopsy. For each biopsied cirAE, pre-biopsy clinical diagnoses and post-biopsy clinico-pathologic diagnoses were retrospectively obtained from the medical record. Each biopsy-ordering dermatology provider was categorized as a general dermatologist or supportive oncodermatologist on the basis of providing clinical care within a cancer-center or attending on a hospital/clinic service dedicated to anti-cancer drug-related skin toxicities. RESULTS: Of 4,183 patients who initiated anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy between 2010 and 2019, 101 (2.4%) patients collectively had 104 biopsied cirAEs. In more than one-third of all reviewed biopsied cirAEs (n = 39, 37.5%), histopathology results frequently led to revision of the pre-biopsy clinical diagnosis. The rate of initial cirAE misclassification amongst supportive oncodermatologists was significantly lower than that amongst general dermatologists (18/66, 27.3% vs. 21/38, 55.3%; Fischer's-exact-test p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Experienced supportive oncodermatologists may benefit patient care through increased diagnostic accuracy for skin toxicities from ICIs. Collectively, these results underscore that both skin biopsy from any dermatology provider and oncodermatology referral (where available) are valuable resources that should be integrated into supportive cancer care.

Feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early reports suggest significant difficulty with enteral feeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We examined 323 adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of Massachusetts General Hospital between March 11 and June 28, 2020 who received enteral nutrition. Systematic chart review determined prevalence, clinical characteristics, and hospital outcomes (ICU complications, length of stay, and mortality) of feeding intolerance. RESULTS: Feeding intolerance developed in 56% of the patients and most commonly manifested as large gastric residual volumes (83.9%), abdominal distension (67.2%), and vomiting (63.9%). Length of intubation (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08), ≥1 GI symptom on presentation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.97), and severe obesity (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66) were independently associated with development of feeding intolerance. Compared to feed-tolerant patients, patients with incident feeding intolerance were significantly more likely to suffer cardiac, renal, hepatic, and hematologic complications during their hospitalization. Feeding intolerance was similarly associated with poor outcomes including longer ICU stay (median [IQR] 21.5 [14-30] vs. 15 [9-22] days, P < 0.001), overall hospitalization time (median [IQR] 30.5 [19-42] vs. 24 [15-35], P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (33.9% vs. 16.1%, P < 0.001). Feeding intolerance was independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 3.32; 95% CI 1.97-5.6). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding intolerance is a frequently encountered complication in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a large tertiary care experience and is associated with poor outcomes.

SynNotch-CAR T cells overcome challenges of specificity, heterogeneity, and persistence in treating glioblastoma.

Treatment of solid cancers with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is plagued by the lack of ideal target antigens that are both absolutely tumor specific and homogeneously expressed. We show that multi-antigen prime-and-kill recognition circuits provide flexibility and precision to overcome these challenges in the context of glioblastoma. A synNotch receptor that recognizes a specific priming antigen, such as the heterogeneous but tumor-specific glioblastoma neoantigen epidermal growth factor receptor splice variant III (EGFRvIII) or the central nervous system (CNS) tissue-specific antigen myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), can be used to locally induce expression of a CAR. This enables thorough but controlled tumor cell killing by targeting antigens that are homogeneous but not absolutely tumor specific. Moreover, synNotch-regulated CAR expression averts tonic signaling and exhaustion, maintaining a higher fraction of the T cells in a naïve/stem cell memory state. In immunodeficient mice bearing intracerebral patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) with heterogeneous expression of EGFRvIII, a single intravenous infusion of EGFRvIII synNotch-CAR T cells demonstrated higher antitumor efficacy and T cell durability than conventional constitutively expressed CAR T cells, without off-tumor killing. T cells transduced with a synNotch-CAR circuit primed by the CNS-specific antigen MOG also exhibited precise and potent control of intracerebral PDX without evidence of priming outside of the brain. In summary, by using circuits that integrate recognition of multiple imperfect but complementary antigens, we improve the specificity, completeness, and persistence of T cells directed against glioblastoma, providing a general recognition strategy applicable to other solid tumors.

Patterns of Cutaneous and Noncutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Importance: Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are some of the earliest toxic reactions to emerge following immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) initiation. As an early indicator of robust inflammatory response, cirAEs may be associated with patterns of immune-mediated toxic effects, but associations between these events and noncutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain underexplored. Objectives: To characterize patterns of cirAEs and irAEs across care settings and examine associations between the features of first cirAE, overall irAE risk, and risk of specific irAE subtypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic medical center. The cohort included 358 patients with cancer who initiated anti-programmed death 1/ligand 1 and/or anticytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-4 ICI therapy between January 1, 2016, and March 8, 2019, and developed 1 or more cirAEs, identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes and confirmed via manual medical record review. All relevant information documented before March 31, 2020, was included. Exposures: Anti-programmed death 1/ligand 1 and/or anticytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-4 therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations between specific cirAE morphologic classes and patterns of irAEs (occurrence, timeline, organ class, and specific toxic effects). Given the potential that shared underlying factors are associated with the risk of both noncutaneous and cutaneous toxic effects, the presence of observed positive associations between certain cirAE and irAE subtypes was hypothesized. Results: Of the 358 patients, 213 were men (59.5%); median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 55-73 years). Nearly half of the patients (177 [49.4%]) with cirAE also developed a noncutaneous irAE. Most patients (128 [72.3%]) experienced their first cirAE before developing any irAE. Several cirAE morphologic classes were found to be associated with overall, organ-based, and specific irAEs. More specifically, mucositis was found to be associated with overall irAE risk (odds ratio [OR], 5.28; 95% CI, 1.11-24.26; P = .04), gastrointestinal irAEs (OR, 5.70; 95% CI, 1.11-29.40; P = .04), and the specific diagnosis of gastroenterocolitis (OR, 6.80; 95% CI, 1.24-37.39; P = .03). In addition, psoriasis was associated with an increased risk of endocrine irAEs (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 1.21-17.04; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, these findings underscore the risk of multisystem toxic effects in patients experiencing cirAEs and highlight potential opportunities for dermatologists in the management of noncutaneous toxic effects.