Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Public Health ; 225: 218-228, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37939463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the overall prevalence of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses from 2000 to January 2022. Cross-sectional studies were included if they were conducted on more than 292 patients with T2D and reported the number of insulin-treated patients who were justified as achieving glycemic control. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Pooled estimates of the prevalence of glycemic control were calculated and reported with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using a random-effects model. All analyses were conducted using RStudio Version 2022.02.0, Build 443 (meta package). RESULTS: A total of 42 studies (234,345 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were classified as having a low risk of bias. The overall estimated prevalence of glycemic control to insulin therapy among patients with T2D was 26.02% (95% CI: 23.17, 29.08). A subgroup of 34 studies that set the target HbA1c <7% showed that 23.75% (95% CI: 21.47, 26.18) of patients with T2D treated with insulin were justified as achieving good glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided summative evidence that glycemic control among patients with T2D treated with insulin was suboptimal and should be appropriately addressed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Insulin , Humans , Insulin/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Glycemic Control , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies
2.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 24(1): 85-92, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671272

ABSTRACT

The computerized antithrombotic risk assessment tool (CARAT) is an online decision-support algorithm that facilitates a systematic review of a patient's stroke risk, bleeding risk, and pertinent medication safety considerations, to generate an individualized treatment recommendation. The CARAT was prospectively applied across 2 hospitals in the greater Sydney area. Its impact on antithrombotics utilization for thromboprophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was evaluated. Factors influencing prescribers' treatment selection were identified. The CARAT recommended a change in baseline therapy for 51.8% of patients. Among anticoagulant-eligible patients (ie, where the risk of stroke outweighed the risk of bleeding) using "nil therapy" or antiplatelet therapy at baseline, the CARAT recommended an upgrade to warfarin in 60 (30.8%) patients. For those in whom the bleeding risk outweighed the stroke risk, the CARAT recommended a downgrade from warfarin to safer alternatives (eg, aspirin) in 37 (19%) patients. Among the "most eligible" (ie, high stroke risk, low bleeding risk, no contraindications; n = 75), the CARAT recommended warfarin for all cases. Discharge therapy observed a marginal increase in anticoagulation prescription in eligible patients (n = 116; 57.8% vs 64.7%, P = .35) compared to baseline. Predictors of warfarin use (vs antiplatelets) included congestive cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, and polypharmacy. The CARAT was able to optimize the selection of therapy, increasing anticoagulant use among eligible patients. With the increasing complexity of decision-making, such tools may be useful adjuncts in therapy selection in atrial fibrillation. Future studies should explore the utility of such tools in selecting therapies from within an expanded treatment armamentarium comprising the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Drug Prescriptions , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Warfarin/adverse effects
3.
Saudi Pharm J ; 25(8): 1201-1207, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30166910

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and management of hypertension among older adults on admission to hospital and to assess the choice of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in light of relevant comorbid conditions using the national treatment guideline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross sectional study of 503 patients aged 65 years or older admitted to a large metropolitan teaching hospital in Sydney Australia was conducted. The main outcome measures were prevalence of hypertension, blood pressure (BP) control, antihypertensive medication use and the appropriateness of antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent (n = 347) of the study population had a documented diagnosis of hypertension and of these, approximately one third were at target BP levels on admission to hospital. Some concerns regarding choice of antihypertensive noted with 51% of those with comorbid diabetes and 30% of those with comorbid heart failure receiving a potentially inappropriate antihypertensive agent. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy, many older adults do not have optimal BP control and are not reaching target BP levels. New strategies to improve blood pressure control in older populations especially targeting women, those with a past history of myocardial infarction and those on multiple antihypertensive medications are needed.

4.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 41(4): 432-40, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338004

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Antithrombotics for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) are reportedly underutilised. Since the burden of care lies within general practice, attention must be paid to identifying and addressing practice gaps in this setting. The objective of this study was to determine the contemporary utilisation of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF within Australian general practice (GP). METHODS: Data pertaining to AF patients' (aged ≥65 years) were collected from GP surgeries in New South Wales, Australia, using purpose-designed data collection forms; extracted data comprised patients' medical histories, current pharmacotherapy, and relevant characteristics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Data pertaining to 393 patients (mean age 78·0 ± 7·0 years) were reviewed. Overall, most (98·5%) patients received antithrombotic therapy. Among the 387 patients using antithrombotics, most (94·1%) received mono-therapy. "Warfarin ± antiplatelet" was most frequently used (81·7%); 77·5% used "warfarin" as a monotherapy, followed by "dabigatran ± clopidogrel" (11·6%), "aspirin" (5·9%) and "clopidogrel" alone (0·8%). High stroke risk and low bleeding risk were associated with increased use of "warfarin ± antiplatelet" therapy. Older patients (≥80 years) were more likely to receive 'nil therapy' (P = 0·04), and less likely to receive dual and triple antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSION: We found an encouraging improvement compared to previous studies in the utilisation of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF within general practice. Warfarin is now utilised as the mainstay therapy, followed by aspirin, although the novel oral anticoagulants are entering the spectrum of therapies used. Consideration needs to be given to the potential impact of the newer agents and their scope of use.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Stroke/prevention & control , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , General Practice , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , New South Wales , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Stroke/etiology , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effects , Warfarin/therapeutic use
5.
Diabet Med ; 32(6): 725-37, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25440507

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate the extent of and factors associated with adherence to Type 2 diabetes medication. METHODS: The CINAHL, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Medline, PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched for the period January 2004 to July 2013. Papers were included in the present review if they reported the prevalence of adherence (the percentage of the study population that is classified as adherent) to Type 2 diabetes medication and used validated adherence measures with a defined cut-off point to indicate adherence. Reported factors were classified as potential predictors if the studies that examined that particular variable reported consistent findings. RESULTS: Of the 27 studies included in the present review, the prevalence of adherence ranged from 38.5 to 93.1%. Only six out of 27 studies (22.2%) reported prevalence of adherence of ≥ 80% among their study population. Depression and medication cost were found to be consistent and potentially modifiable predictors for diabetes medication-taking behaviour. The associations between adherence and other factors were inconsistent among the reviewed studies. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to diabetes medication remains an ongoing problem. This review has highlighted the urgent need to develop consensus about what constitutes good adherence in diabetes. Further research is needed to clarify modifiable factors, in addition to depression and medication cost, that influence adherence and may provide a focus for targeted interventions to promote adherence, optimize diabetes control and limit the progression of diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 37(6): 620-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22708668

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Thrombolysis using intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the only available evidence-based treatment for acute ischaemic stroke; however, its current utilization is very low. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the literature regarding the use of intravenous tPA for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. The review will also compare utilization rates of thrombolysis in different centres across the world and identify key reasons for the underutilization of thrombolysis in stroke. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant original articles, review papers and other publications over the publication period 1995-2012. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (1995, N = 624 patients) and ECASS III (2008, N = 821 patients) are two pivotal randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the use of intravenous tPA within 3 h or 3-4.5 h from stroke onset, respectively. Both trials have shown that tPA administration decreases disability at 90 days from stroke. Furthermore, a recent pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials (2010, N = 3670 patients) supports these results, highlighting that early stroke treatment is associated with better outcomes, especially when treatment is started within 90 min of stroke onset (but suggesting that the benefit could be afforded within a 4.5-h time window). Three major observational trials, STARS (2000, N = 389 patients), CASES (2005, N = 1135 patients) and SITS-MOST (2007, N = 6483 patients), have reported acceptable safety and efficacy in clinical practice. However, only a small proportion of acute ischaemic stroke patients receive tPA in clinical practice, because of the limited availability of tPA-utilizing sites and suboptimal use of tPA in sites where it is available. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: tPA reduces disability in stroke patients. Moreover, acceptable safety has been demonstrated in routine clinical practice. However, tPA is significantly underutilized, and specific efforts are needed to encourage appropriate implementation of the stroke treatment guidelines to optimize the use of this important therapy.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Brain Ischemia/pathology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stroke/pathology , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosage , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/adverse effects
7.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 37(4): 399-409, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22384796

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Thrombolysis is currently the only evidence-based pharmacological treatment available for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS); however, its current utilization is suboptimal (administered to <3% of AIS patients). The aim of this article was to identify the potential barriers to the use of thrombolysis via a review of the available literature. METHODS: Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant original articles, review papers and other literature published in the period 1995-2011. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Several barriers to the utilization of thrombolysis in stroke have been identified in the literature and can be broadly classified as 'preadmission' barriers and 'post-admission' barriers. Preadmission barriers include patient and paramedic-related factors leading to late patient presentation for treatment (i.e. outside the therapeutic time window for the administration of thrombolysis). Post-admission barriers include in-hospital factors, such as suboptimal triage of stroke patients and inefficient in-hospital acute stroke care systems, a lack of appropriate infrastructure and expertise to administer thrombolysis, physician uncertainty in prescribing thrombolysis and difficulty in obtaining informed consent for thrombolysis. Suggested strategies to overcome these barriers include public awareness campaigns, prehospital triage by paramedics, hospital bypass protocols and prenotification systems, urgent stroke-unit admission, on-call multidisciplinary acute stroke teams, urgent neuroimaging protocols, telestroke interventions and risk-assessment tools to aid physicians when considering thrombolysis. Additionally, greater pharmacists' engagement is warranted to help identify the people at risk of stroke and support preventative strategies, and provide the public with information regarding the recognition of stroke, as well as facilitate the access and use of thrombolysis. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The most effective interventions appear to be those comprising several strategies and those that target more than one barrier simultaneously. Therefore, optimal utilization of thrombolysis requires a systematic, integrated multidisciplinary approach across the continuum of acute care.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Brain Ischemia/pathology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Professional Role , Stroke/pathology , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Time Factors , Triage/methods , Triage/standards
8.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 36(6): 664-72, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21355875

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Worldwide studies have shown that significant proportions of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) do not meet targets for glycaemic control, blood pressure (BP) and lipids, putting them at higher risk of developing complications. However, little is known about medicines management in Australian primary care populations with T2DM. The aim of this study was to (i) describe the management of a large group of patients in primary care, (ii) identify areas for improvement in management and (iii) determine any relationship between adherence and glycaemic, BP and lipid control. METHODS: This was a retrospective, epidemiological study of primary care patients with T2DM diabetes, with HbA(1c) of >7%, recruited in 90 Australian community pharmacies. Data collected included demographic details, diabetes history, current medication regimen, height, weight, BP, physical activity and smoking status. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 430 patients, 98% used antidiabetics, 80% antihypertensives, 73% lipid lowering drugs and 38% aspirin. BP and all lipid targets were met by only 21% and 14% of the treated patients and 21% and 12% of the untreated patients respectively. Medication adherence was related to better glycaemic control (P = 0.04). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-base prescribing practice gap was seen in this Australian primary care population of T2DM patients. Patients were undertreated with antihypertensive and lipid lowering medication, and several subgroups with co-morbidities were not receiving the recommended pharmacotherapy. Interventions are required to redress the current evidence-base prescribing practice gap in disease management in primary care.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Australia , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Lipids/blood , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Retrospective Studies
9.
Diabet Med ; 28(8): 987-93, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21418096

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate (i) optimal intensity (four visits vs. six visits) and duration (6 vs. 12 months) of the Diabetes Medication Assistance Service in community pharmacy and (ii) sustainability of improvements in patients' diabetes control associated with differing intensities of intervention. METHODS: A national quota sample of 90 community pharmacies in Australia were randomly assigned into group 1 (6-month Diabetes Medication Assistance Service) or group 2 (12-month Diabetes Medication Assistance Service) and subsequently recruited a total of 524 patients. A wide range of clinical (HbA(1c) , blood pressure, lipids) and quality-of-life outcome measures were assessed. RESULTS: The 6- and 12-month Diabetes Medication Assistance Service resulted in significant and similar reductions in HbA(1c) (-0.9 mmol/mol; 95% CI -0.7 to -1.1) -, total cholesterol (-0.3 mmol/l; 95% CI -0.1 to -0.4) and triglycerides (-0.3 mmol/l; 95% CI -0.1 to -0.5). There was also a significant reduction in the number of patients who were at risk of having a cardiovascular event in the next 10 years. For the subset of patients for whom data were available at baseline, completion and 18 months, improvements in HbA(1c) and total cholesterol were sustained at 18 months and triglycerides showed a further improvement at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Diabetes Medication Assistance Service resulted in significant improvements in diabetes control that were independent of intensity and duration of the service and showed evidence of being sustained at 18 months. The extent and sustainability of clinical improvements achieved by the Diabetes Medication Assistance Service, together with the resulting reduction in cardiovascular risk, should translate into future cost savings to healthcare systems by delaying and reducing diabetes-related complications.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/standards , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/drug effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Lipids/blood , Australia/epidemiology , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Female , Humans , Male
10.
Australas Med J ; 4(4): 190-200, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23393510

ABSTRACT

Asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions affecting the Australian population. Amongst primary healthcare professionals, pharmacists are the most accessible and this places pharmacists in an excellent position to play a role in the management of asthma. Globally, trials of many community pharmacy-based asthma care models have provided evidence that pharmacist delivered interventions can improve clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes for asthma patients. In Australia, a decade of coordinated research efforts, in various aspects of asthma care, has culminated in the implementation trial of the Pharmacy Asthma Management Service (PAMS), a comprehensive disease management model.There has been research investigating asthma medication adherence through data mining, ways in which usual asthma care can be improved. Our research has focused on self-management education, inhaler technique interventions, spirometry trials, interprofessional models of care, and regional trials addressing the particular needs of rural communities. We have determined that inhaler technique education is a necessity and should be repeated if correct technique is to be maintained. We have identified this effectiveness of health promotion and health education, conducted within and outside the confines of the pharmacy, in public for a and settings such as schools, and established that this outreach role is particularly well received and increases the opportunity for people with asthma to engage in their asthma management.Our research has identified that asthma patients have needs which pharmacists delivering specialized models of care, can address. There is a lot of evidence for the effectiveness of asthma care by pharmacists, the future must involve integration of this role into primary care.

11.
Patient Educ Couns ; 70(1): 111-7, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17997261

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of healthcare professional versus patient goal setting for the self-management of intermittent allergic rhinitis (AR) on symptom severity and quality of life. METHODS: This was a 6 week, parallel group study. Group A participants, with pharmacist facilitation, nominated personally relevant goals and strategies relating to their AR. Group B participants had their goals and strategies set by the pharmacist. The main outcome measures used included perceived symptom severity and quality of life. In addition, goals and strategies data from participants of both groups were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in symptom severity and quality of life scores however Group B symptom severity scores improved more. Group B set a greater number of goals and strategies which were better structured and more task specific. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the impact of goal setting on patient behaviour in a chronic yet episodic illness. Our results suggest that self-management goals set by the healthcare professional which are clinically indicated but tailored to the patient's nominated symptoms yields better outcomes than goals nominated by the patient. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A brief, structured intervention, tailored to patient symptoms, can enhance self-management of intermittent allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Patient Care Planning , Patient Participation , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Self Care , Adult , Chronic Disease , Female , Goals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Quality of Life
12.
Health Educ Res ; 22(6): 918-30, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17947249

ABSTRACT

Written Medicines Information (WMI) is regarded as a key component in diabetes consumer education. In Australia, there is a paucity of WMI that specifically tailors to the extensive array of medicines used for the lifelong management of Type 2 diabetes. This research project aimed to employ a novel framework, the 'Consumer Involvement Cycle', to investigate consumer perspectives and needs of medicines information for Type 2 diabetes and develop appropriate WMI for the Type 2 diabetes population. The Consumer Involvement Cycle involved people with Type 2 diabetes and health professionals (HPs) working in partnership to design a series of WMI, incorporating a range of consumer-conceived ideas and concepts with professional evaluation from an expert panel of reviewing HPs. A total of 12 leaflets were developed. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Score for the leaflets was approximately 8.0, which is considered to be 'fairly easy', in other words easily understood by a large proportion of the general public. The Consumer Involvement Cycle was validated as a useful framework in developing and evaluating appropriate consumer information. Consumer perspectives should be sought and well incorporated throughout the process of designing and assessing educational materials intended for consumer use.


Subject(s)
Consumer Health Information/standards , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Drug Labeling/standards , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Teaching Materials/standards , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Patient Participation , Qualitative Research
13.
Diabet Med ; 24(6): 677-83, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17523968

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the impact of a community pharmacy diabetes service model on patient outcomes in Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study utilized a multisite, control vs. intervention, repeated-measures design within four states in Australia. Fifty-six community pharmacies, 28 intervention and 28 control, were randomly selected from a representative sample of urban and rural areas. Intervention pharmacies delivered a diabetes service to patients with Type 2 diabetes, which comprised an ongoing cycle of assessment, management and review, provided at regular intervals over 6 months in the pharmacy. These services included support for self monitoring of blood glucose, education, adherence support, and reminders of checks for diabetes complications. Control pharmacists assessed patients at 0 and 6 months and delivered no intervention. RESULTS: A total of 289 subjects (149 intervention and 140 control) completed the study. For the intervention subjects, the mean blood glucose level decreased over the 6-month study from 9.4 to 8.5 mmol/l (P < 0.01). Furthermore, significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control were seen in the intervention group compared with the control: the mean reduction in HbA(1c) in the intervention group was -0.97% (95% CI: -0.8, -1.14) compared with -0.27% (95% CI: -0.15, -0.39) in the control group. Improvements were also seen in blood pressure control and quality of life in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A pharmacy diabetes service model resulted in significant improvements in clinical and humanistic outcomes. Thus, community pharmacists can contribute significantly to improving care and health outcomes for patients with Type 2 diabetes. Future research should focus on clarifying the most effective elements of the service model.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/standards , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Australia , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Rural Health Services/standards , Urban Health Services/standards
14.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 75(3): 339-47, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16884811

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Australian community pharmacy. METHODS: A random sample of 30 pharmacies were allocated into two groups: (i) tick test only (TTO); or (ii) sequential screening (SS) method. Both methods used the same initial risk assessment for type 2 diabetes. Subjects with one or more risk factors in the TTO group were offered a referral to their general practitioner (GP). Under the SS method, patients with risk factors were offered a capillary blood glucose test and those identified as being at risk referred to a GP. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these approaches was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1286 people were screened over a period of 3 months. The rate of diagnosis of diabetes was significantly higher for SS compared with the TTO method (1.7% versus 0.2%; p=0.008). The SS method resulted in fewer referrals to the GP and a higher uptake of referrals than the TTO method and so was the more cost-effective screening method. CONCLUSIONS: SS is the superior method from a cost and efficacy perspective. It should be considered as the preferred option for screening by community based pharmacists in Australia.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Pharmacies , Australia/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pharmacies/standards , Reference Values , Referral and Consultation , Risk Factors
15.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 28(4): 311-8, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12911684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical care was a concept initially defined in the early 1990s. It had its roots within clinical pharmacy, in the USA. In Denmark, pharmaceutical care has been part of the professional standards of practice for community pharmacy since 1995. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate the provision of pharmaceutical care in community practice in Denmark. A focus of the study was the estimation of the frequency of medicine-related problem identification and the process of problem management in the Danish pharmacies. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of all Danish community pharmacies was conducted (n = 288). The variables included: detection and identification of medicine-related problems, goal-setting for solving medicine-related problems, and documentation of efforts to solve these. The response rate was 75.7%. A non-respondent analysis was performed. RESULTS: On average three medicine-related problems per pharmacy were found within the working week prior to the survey. For two-thirds of those cases the type of problem involved was identified. For the other third, goals had been set to resolve the problem. Minimal documentation of these activities was reported. The primary collaborators in problem management were general practitioners and patients. CONCLUSION: Pharmaceutical care, in its fullest sense, as defined in policy documents in Denmark, was not evident in practice. While some aspects of pharmaceutical care were being performed, almost no documentation of efforts was taking place in community pharmacy.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/standards , Pharmacists/psychology , Adult , Aged , Community Pharmacy Services/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Denmark , Documentation , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Professional Role , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL