Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 37(5): 362-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943594

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in choristers, teachers and control subjects without vocal load at work and to determine the risk factors for laryngopharyngeal reflux. DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, multivariate comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and nineteen singers from four professional choirs, seventy teachers from four schools and 111 control subjects with an occupation without vocal load. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All participants completed a questionnaire about their dietary habits, height and weight, presence of stress, smoking and allergies, including the nine-item Reflux Symptom Index. The groups of choristers, teachers and the controls were compared with each other with regard to their sex, age, dietary habits, body-mass index, Reflux Symptom Index score and other factors affecting voice quality. The subjects from all three groups with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux were compared with the subjects without it. The relationship between the Reflux Symptom Index score and the possible risk factors for reflux was estimated. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher Reflux Symptom Index scores in the choristers than in the teachers and the controls (mean scores, 7.86 versus 6.33, P = 0.044; 7.86 versus 4.80, P = 0.000, respectively), but the number of subjects with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (Reflux Symptom Index score >13) did not differ significantly between the groups. The choristers were significantly more often treated for laryngopharyngeal reflux than the teachers and the controls (41%, 17% and 28%, respectively). The occupation chorister and frequently experiencing stress were the only factors that influenced the total Reflux Symptom Index score. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngopharyngeal reflux affects the choristers more often than the teachers or the control subjects without vocal load at work. These results suggest that singing as the main professional activity can notably contribute to the development of the reflux. Vocal load without singing is probably not an important aetiological factor for laryngopharyngeal reflux. The extraoesophageal symptoms affecting voice require treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux and proper dietary habits especially in the group with high voice quality demands.


Subject(s)
Causality , Faculty , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/epidemiology , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Singing , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Slovenia , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Int Angiol ; 30(6): 555-66, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22233617

ABSTRACT

AIM: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with frequent cardiovascular ischemic events. We followed the survival of PAD patients and tested whether PAD remains an adverse prognostic indicator in spite of treatment according to the current European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention. METHODS: Eight hundred eleven patients with PAD and 778 control subjects, aged 65 (SD 9) years at inclusion, with a male/female ratio of 3/2 were treated according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention and evaluated yearly for occurrence of death, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, stroke or critical limb ischemia (major events) and revascularization procedures (minor events). At baseline, classical risk factors were significantly more prevalent in the PAD group and protective cardiovascular medication was prescribed to patients with PAD more frequently than to control subjects. RESULTS: In the PAD group, the 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 96.7% (CI 95.4-97.9) vs. 98.2% (CI 97.2-99.1) in the control group, P=0.059. The groups differed in the 2-year major event-free survival: 93.5% (CI 92.7-95.3) in PAD vs. 97.1% (CI 95.9-98.4) in controls, P<0.017, as well as in event-free survival: 79.9% (CI 77.1-82.9) in PAD vs.96.4% (CI 95.0-97.9) in controls, P<0.001. CONCLUSION: Patients with PAD had a borderline higher risk of all-cause death and a significantly higher risk of major and minor non-fatal cardiovascular events compared to control subjects. However, treatment according to the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention resulted in encouragingly low absolute mortality and morbidity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00761969.).


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Ischemia/prevention & control , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Slovenia , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...