Clinical Outcomes after Mitral Valve Surgery in Failed MitraClip Procedures.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated in-hospital and overall outcome of patients who received mitral valve replacement (MVR) after failed MitraClip procedure. METHODS: A total of 26 out of 740 patients received MVR after treatment with MitraClip between June 2010 and December 2020. We analyzed in-hospital mortality and overall mortality during the median follow-up period of 72 days after MVR. RESULTS: The median age in the entire cohort was 77.5 years. In-hospital mortality was 15.4% (n = 4) and the overall mortality during the follow-up period was 27% (n = 7). The median time between the MitraClip procedure and surgery was 34.5 days. The main reasons for surgery were mitral stenosis (23.1%), persistent prolapse of the mitral valve leaflets (42.3%), and persistent tethering of the mitral valve leaflets (34.6%). At the time of surgery all of the patients presented with New York Heart Association 3 and above. The underlying mitral valve pathology was mainly secondary 61.5% (n = 16). Median left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 60 mm. Preoperative ejection fraction was 40% and above in 73% of the cohort. In addition to the mitral valve procedure, 57.7% of patients received either concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic replacement, or coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSION: The need for MVR for failed MitraClip repair is low and the results are acceptable. However, remaining options for reconstruction are usually limited and MVR is often needed. Anticipating success or failure according to the underlying pathology more than according to concomitant risk factors should form the basis in decision making for the treatment modality of first choice.

Postcardiotomy mechanical support in patients with mitral valve prostheses is associated with poor survival.

AIMS: To elaborate on early survival in patients with mitral valve replacement requiring temporary extracorporeal life support system (ECLS). METHODS: We analyzed survival, significant bleeding, wound infection, and ECLS duration in 421 from 14,400 patients with postoperative need for ECLS from January 2008 to December 2017 at our institution. Finally, patients were stratified according to the type of surgery performed: the mitral group (mitral valve replacement) n = 63 and the control group (any cardiac surgery excluding the mitral valve) n = 358. In order to adjust for preoperative patient characteristics, a propensity matching analysis was performed. Differences in in-hospital mortality were analyzed accordingly. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the mitral group as compared to the control group before and after adjustment (p < 0.001). Median duration of ECLS was 4 days in both groups. Perioperative bleeding (p < 0.001) and wound infection (p < 0.001) also showed significant worse outcome parameters in the mitral group. The main causes of death in the mitral group were multiorgan failure, n = 48 (76%), stroke, n = 7 (12%), and intracardiac thrombus formation, n = 5 (10%). CONCLUSIONS: ECLS is associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate in patients after mitral valve replacement.

Moderate or Severe Functional MR and Severe AS: Is Mitral Valve Surgery Justified?

OBJECTIVE: Mitral regurgitation (MR) and severe aortic valve stenosis often coexist. Concomitant replacement of both valves is associated with a significantly higher morbidity and mortality. This study sought to investigate the progression of MR after isolated aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We analyzed the severity and progression of MR, survival and echocardiographic parameters in 506 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and moderate to severe functional MR who received isolated aortic valve replacement during a 9-year period. RESULTS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was performed in 381 patients and 125 patients received surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The median age of the cohort was 82 years. Median ejection fraction before and after TAVI or SAVR was 35 and 36% respectively (p = 0.64). There was a statistically significant reduction in the MR (p < 0.001) within both groups. Survival in both groups at 5 years was at 25%. CONCLUSION: Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with accompanying moderate to severe functional MR may present an adequate treatment option for this high-risk patient collective.

Efficacy of Vascular Closure Devices in Closing Large-Bore Sheath Arterial Sites after Treatment with Extracorporeal Life Support System.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated vascular complications and wound infections after surgical or percutaneous transfemoral removal of temporary extracorporeal life support systems (ECLSs). METHODS: A total of 83 patients were weaned from ECLS between August 2015 and September 2020. We analyzed for a composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections requiring negative-pressure wound therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: percutaneous group using the MANTA vascular occlusion system (VCD; Teleflex, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States) (n = 23) and surgical group (n = 60). RESULTS: The median age in the entire cohort was 67 years. Vascular complications were seen in 20% (n = 12) in the surgical group and in 13% (n = 3) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.72). A total of 32% (n = 19) in the surgical group and 9% (n = 2) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.031) had wound infections. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections showed significantly more complications in the surgical group (52%, n = 31) as compared with the percutaneous group (22%, n = 5) (p = 0.020). The median duration in the intensive care unit was 13 days for the surgical group and 12 days for the percutaneous group without any significant difference in both groups (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Using the MANTA VCD for percutaneous removal of ECLS cannulas after weaning from ECLS is safe and reproducible. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections was significantly lower in the percutaneous removal group as compared with the surgical group.

Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Trends and Outcomes in Over 27,000 Medicare Patients for Descending Thoracic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Since United States Food and Drug Administration approval in 2005, thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has replaced open surgery to become the preferred treatment for descending thoracic aneurysms (DTAs). This study investigated TEVAR trends during the previous 15 years regarding patient and hospital characteristics and their effect on survival. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2014, 27,079 Medicare patients underwent TEVAR for DTA. We analyzed TEVAR trends during this period and stratified hospitals based on the number of cases completed during the previous 5 years: low (0-19 cases), medium (20-99 cases), and high (≥100 cases) volume. Trends over time were calculated using Poisson regression to determine the average annual percentage changes (aAPC). Survival was calculated using a multivariate Cox regression and adjusted logistic regression with a restricted cubic spline. RESULTS: TEVAR volume significantly increased from 81 cases in 2000 to 3478 cases in 2014 (aAPC, 16.2%; P < .001). During the study period, the proportion of cases performed at medium-volume centers increased (aAPC, 5.2%; P < .001). Thirty-day mortality after TEVAR increased in the recent period (2013-2014) to 8.8% as compared with 6.6% in the early years (2004-2006) of TEVAR (P < .001), and a significant contribution was due to increased patient comorbidity score (aAPC, 1.6%; P < .001). Lastly, TEVAR center volume was significantly associated with 30-day survival when fewer than 33 cases were done in the prior 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2014, TEVAR volume accelerated, and centers are gaining more experience. TEVAR patients have become more acute, and mortality has increased over this period. Patient selection and procedural experience are critical to improving outcomes.

Outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with chronic kidney disease in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has been increasingly performed in higher-risk patients with renal failure. The objective was to compare Medicare patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease with patients with normal renal function to determine differences in postoperative survival and complications. METHODS: From 2000 to 2014, 27,079 Medicare fee-for service patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients were stratified by kidney function, and 23,375 patients (86%) had no chronic kidney disease, 2957 patients (11%) had chronic kidney disease stage I/IV, and 747 patients (3%) had end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis. Groups were then compared with determined differences in adjusted all-cause mortality and rates of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis compared with patients with no chronic kidney disease (1-year survival no chronic kidney disease: 78%; chronic kidney disease I/II: 77%; chronic kidney disease III: 67%; chronic kidney disease IV: 58%; and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis: 48%, P < .001). Mortality was significantly increased among patients with chronic kidney disease III (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; P < .001), chronic kidney disease IV (HR, 1.74; P < .001), and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis (HR, 2.03; P < .001). No mortality difference was found between patients with no chronic kidney disease and patients with chronic kidney disease stage I/II. At 30 days after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, sepsis was increased for patients with chronic kidney disease stage III/IV (HR, 1.7; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis (HR, 2.7; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this elderly Medicare population undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, patients with chronic kidney disease stage III, chronic kidney disease stage IV, or end-stage renal disease/hemodialysis had poor survival and increased morbidity compared with those with normal kidney function. These data may suggest that patients with chronic kidney disease stage III, chronic kidney disease stage IV, or end-stage renal disease/hemodialysis should be more cautiously evaluated for thoracic endovascular aortic repair, weighing the benefits of the procedure against the high expected mortality.

Adding tricuspid repair to standard open heart surgery does not increase risk but improves right ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcome of concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty in mild or moderate regurgitation on perioperative outcome and on right ventricular function in patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. METHODS: Among 14 500 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution between January 2000 and April 2016, 1023 patients had a documented history of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Of those patients, 324 patients were diagnosed with mild or moderate secondary TR with a dilated annulus (≥40 mm or >21 mm/m2) and composed the study population. The decision to perform concomitant annuloplasty was subjected to the individual decision of the treating surgeon. Our analysis focused on a comparison between patients with concomitant TR-repair (group 1, n = 184) and patients without concomitant TR-repair (group 2, n = 140) after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Following a preliminary data preprocessing, we observed a mean age of 73.8 years, mean logistic EuroSCORE of 10.5%. Perioperative mortality was 4.4% in group 1 and 5.7% in group 2. There was no significant difference in mid-term mortality. TR after surgery was significantly higher in group 2. After propensity score matching regression analysis, patients who had a repaired tricuspid valve (group 1) had better right ventricle (RV) function than those without TR-repair (group 2) (P > 0.05 at 95% confidence interval following Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness of fit Test). CONCLUSIONS: Adding tricuspid valve repair in patients with mild or moderate secondary TR with a dilated annulus (≥40 mm or >21 mm/m2) to standard open heart surgery does not increase perioperative risk but improves right ventricular function. Therefore, standard tricuspid repair in this subgroup might be considered on a routine basis.