Dorsal subthalamic nucleus targeting in deep brain stimulation: microelectrode recording versus 7-Tesla connectivity.

Connectivity-derived 7-Tesla MRI segmentation and intraoperative microelectrode recording can both assist subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. It remains unclear whether deep brain stimulation electrodes placed in the 7-Tesla MRI segmented subdivision with predominant projections to cortical motor areas (hyperdirect pathway) achieve superior motor improvement and whether microelectrode recording can accurately distinguish the motor subdivision. In 25 patients with Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation electrodes were evaluated for being inside or outside the predominantly motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (motor-connected subthalamic nucleus or non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus, respectively) based on 7-Tesla MRI connectivity segmentation. Hemi-body motor improvement (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III) and microelectrode recording characteristics of multi- and single-unit activities were compared between groups. Deep brain stimulation electrodes placed in the motor-connected subthalamic nucleus resulted in higher hemi-body motor improvement, compared with electrodes placed in the non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (80% versus 52%, P < 0.0001). Multi-unit activity was found slightly higher in the motor-connected subthalamic nucleus versus the non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (P < 0.001, receiver operating characteristic 0.63); single-unit activity did not differ between groups. Deep brain stimulation in the connectivity-derived 7-Tesla MRI subthalamic nucleus motor segment produced a superior clinical outcome; however, microelectrode recording did not accurately distinguish this subdivision within the subthalamic nucleus.

Supine MDS-UPDRS-III Assessment: An Explorative Study.

The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) is designed to be applied in the sitting position. However, to evaluate the clinical effect during stereotactic neurosurgery or to assess bedridden patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the MDS-UPDRS-III is often used in a supine position. This explorative study evaluates the agreement of the MDS-UPDRS-III in the sitting and the supine positions. In 23 PD patients, the MDS-UPDRS-III was applied in both positions while accelerometric measurements were performed. Video recordings of the assessments were evaluated by two certified raters. Agreement between the sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III was studied using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Relationships between the MDS-UPDRS-III tremor scores and accelerometric amplitudes were calculated for both positions with linear regression. A fair to substantial agreement was found for MDS-UPDRS-III scores of individual items in the sitting and supine positions, while combining all tests resulted in a substantial agreement. The inter-rater reliability was fair to moderate for both positions. A logarithmic relationship between tremor scores and accelerometric amplitude was revealed for both the sitting and supine positions. Nevertheless, these data are insufficient to fully support the supine application of the MDS-UPDRS-III. Several recommendations are made to address the sensitivity of the scale to inter-rater variability. In conclusion, although an overall substantial agreement between sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III is confirmed, its application in the supine position is not endorsed for the whole range of its individual items. Caution is warranted in interpreting the supine MDS-UPDRS-III, pending additional research.

The Intraoperative Microlesion Effect Positively Correlates With the Short-Term Clinical Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: During the surgical procedure of deep brain stimulation (DBS), insertion of an electrode in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) frequently causes a temporary improvement of motor symptoms, known as the microlesion effect (MLE). The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between the intraoperative MLE and the clinical effect of DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores during bilateral STN-DBS implantation were included in this retrospective study. MDS-UPDRS III subscores (resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia) of the contralateral upper extremity were used. During surgery, these subscores were assessed directly before and after insertion of the electrode. Also, these subscores were determined in the outpatient clinic after 11 weeks on average (on-stimulation). All assessments were performed in an off-medication state (at least 12 hours of medication washout). RESULTS: Postinsertion MDS-UPDRS motor scores decreased significantly compared to preinsertion scores (p < 0.001 for both hemispheres). The MLE showed a positive correlation with the clinical effect of DBS in both hemispheres (rho = 0.68 for the primarily treated hemisphere, p < 0.001, and rho = 0.59 for the secondarily treated hemisphere, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The MLE has a clinically relevant correlation with the effect of DBS in PD patients. These results suggest that the MLE can be relied upon as evidence of a clinically effective DBS electrode placement.

STN-DBS electrode placement accuracy and motor improvement in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective neurosurgical treatment for Parkinson's disease. Surgical accuracy is a critical determinant to achieve an adequate DBS effect on motor performance. A two-millimetre surgical accuracy is commonly accepted, but scientific evidence is lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level and individual patient data (IPD) was performed by a comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Primary outcome measures were (1) radial error between the implanted electrode and target; (2) DBS motor improvement on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (motor examination). On a study level, meta-regression analysis was performed. Also, publication bias was assessed. For IPD meta-analysis, a linear mixed effects model was used. Forty studies (1391 patients) were included, reporting radial errors of 0.45-1.86 mm. Errors within this range did not significantly influence the DBS effect on motor improvement. Additional IPD analysis (206 patients) revealed that a mean radial error of 1.13±0.75 mm did not significantly change the extent of DBS motor improvement. Our meta-analysis showed a huge publication bias on accuracy data in DBS. Therefore, the current literature does not provide an unequivocal upper threshold for acceptable accuracy of STN-DBS surgery. Based on the current literature, DBS-electrodes placed within a 2 mm range of the intended target do not have to be repositioned to enhance motor improvement after STN-DBS for Parkinson's disease. However, an indisputable upper cut-off value for surgical accuracy remains to be established. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42018089539.

Are we on the right track in DBS surgery for dystonic head tremor? Polymyography is a promising answer.

The clinical benefit of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is associated with electrode positioning accuracy. Intraoperative assessment of clinical effect is therefore key. Evaluating this clinical effect in patients with dystonic head tremor, as opposed to limb tremor, is challenging because the head is fixed in a stereotactic frame. To clinically assess head tremor during surgery, surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes were bilaterally applied to the sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscles. This case shows that intraoperative polymyography is an easy and useful tool to assess the clinical effect of DBS electrode positioning.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: Update on Long-Term Outcomes, Target Considerations and Future Directions.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus is one of the main advanced neurosurgical treatments for drug-resistant tremor. However, not every patient may be eligible for this procedure. Nowadays, various other functional neurosurgical procedures are available. In particular cases, radiofrequency thalamotomy, focused ultrasound and radiosurgery are proven alternatives to DBS. Besides, other DBS targets, such as the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) or the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT), may be appraised as well. In this review, the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology of tremor syndromes, as well as long-term outcomes of DBS in different targets, will be summarized. The effectiveness and safety of lesioning procedures will be discussed, and an evidence-based clinical treatment approach for patients with drug-resistant tremor will be presented. Lastly, the future directions in the treatment of severe tremor syndromes will be elaborated.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) strongly depends on the appropriate placement of the electrode in the targeted structure. Postoperative MRI is recognized as the gold standard to verify the DBS-electrode position in relation to the intended anatomical target. However, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) might be a feasible alternative to MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective noninferiority study, we compared iCT with postoperative MRI (24-72 hours after surgery) in 29 consecutive patients undergoing placement of 58 DBS electrodes. The primary outcome was defined as the difference in Euclidean distance between lead tip coordinates as determined on both imaging modalities, using the lead tip depicted on MRI as reference. Secondary outcomes were difference in radial error and depth, as well as difference in accuracy relative to target. RESULTS: The mean difference between the lead tips was 0.98 ± 0.49 mm (0.97 ± 0.47 mm for the left-sided electrodes and 1.00 ± 0.53 mm for the right-sided electrodes). The upper confidence interval (95% CI, 0.851 to 1.112) did not exceed the noninferiority margin established. The average radial error between lead tips was 0.74 ± 0.48 mm and the average depth error was determined to be 0.53 ± 0.40 mm. The linear Deming regression indicated a good agreement between both imaging modalities regarding accuracy relative to target. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CT is noninferior to MRI for the verification of the DBS-electrode position. CT and MRI have their specific benefits, but both should be considered equally suitable for assessing accuracy.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Comparison of Targets.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for refractory essential tremor (ET). Initially, the target of choice was the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM). However, the zona incerta (ZI) has been suggested as a superior target. Both targets are considered safe and effective, but a direct comparison between these targets is lacking. METHODS: We analyzed a single-center cohort of 44 patients with ET treated with DBS between 1998 and 2017, targeting the VIM and/or ZI. Patient-reported outcome on the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor rating scale, adverse events, and stimulation-induced side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome of ZI DBS (-2.2 ± 1.2; 18 patients with 28 electrodes) was superior to VIM DBS (-1.2 ± 1.4; 10 patients with 19 electrodes) (P < 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between implantations in VIM (45%) and ZI (46%). Dysarthria stimulation-induced side effects were significantly more often reported after VIM DBS (P = 0.01), whereas visual stimulation-induced side effects occurred more often after ZI DBS (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ZI DBS was superior to VIM DBS in terms of patient-reported effectiveness. There was a comparable number of complications between both targets. This finding further supports ZI over VIM as the principal DBS target in essential tremor.