Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 36(4): 380-381, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288449

Subject(s)
Forecasting , Humans
2.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 36(2): 218-219, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35476775
3.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 36(1): 7-10, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35089168

ABSTRACT

One of the lessons of the current pandemic is that Americans have lost trust in the public health system in the United States (US) and in the health recommendations of the Federal government. History tells us that each pandemic brings new challenges and new lessons. Looking back at the history of pandemics, and at the present experience, nurses and midwives can craft responses to patient concerns and contribute to future planning that better addresses the needs of maternal-child health practices.


Subject(s)
Pandemics , Public Health , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , United States
4.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 35(4): 377-378, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34726658
6.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 66(4): 441-451, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34165238

ABSTRACT

The United States is one of a very few high-income countries that does not guarantee every person the right to health care. Residents of the United States pay more out-of-pocket for increasingly worse outcomes. People of color, those who have lower incomes, and those who live in rural areas have less access to health care and are therefore at even greater risk for poor health. Universal health care, a term for various models of health care systems that provide care for every resident of a given country, will help move the United States toward higher quality, more affordable, and more equitable care. This article defines a reproductive justice and human rights foundation for universal health care, explores how health insurance has worked historically in the United States, identifies the economic reasons for implementing universal health care, and discusses international models that could be used domestically.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Universal Health Care , Delivery of Health Care , Health Personnel , Humans , Social Justice , United States
7.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 66(3): 322-333, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34086396

ABSTRACT

HIV infection is a major public health problem for women in the United States. Prevention of new HIV infections is essential to the goal of eliminating HIV in the United States. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective and safe HIV prevention method recommended for women at increased risk for HIV infection, including during pregnancy and lactation. The recommended PrEP regimen is a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine administered as a single daily dose. The initial evaluation for individuals desiring PrEP for HIV prevention includes obtaining a history, laboratory evaluation, and evaluation of the accessibility and acceptability of PrEP. Individuals using PrEP medications are seen every 3 months for follow-up. These follow-up visits include evaluation for signs and symptoms of seroconversion, management of side effects and adverse reactions, and evaluation of adherence to PrEP. Follow-up visits also include testing for HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and renal function and a review of HIV prevention and risk reduction methods. Despite known safety and efficacy of PrEP among women, PrEP use in women in the United States remains low. Gaps exist in HIV prevention that can in part be addressed by women's health care providers through risk screening and provision of HIV prevention methods. All providers of comprehensive sexual health care can and should assess individuals for risk factors for HIV infection and offer HIV prevention methods, including PrEP, to individuals at risk for HIV.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Emtricitabine/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , United States
8.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 35(2): 105-109, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900236

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic has further illuminated the already existing need for methods of building resilience in perinatal caregivers. Using a scoping review approach, literature was examined to identify evidence-based models of resilience building in a cohort of perinatal clinicians. Research published between January 2015 and 2020 was evaluated using PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases. Of the initial 3399 records reviewed, 2 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Given the deleterious effects of Covid-19 on perinatal care providers, and in light of the paucity of available studies, personnel, time, and funding should be allocated for research to address these issues.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Nurses, Neonatal/psychology , Occupational Stress , Perinatal Care/methods , Resilience, Psychological , Adaptation, Psychological , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Crew Resource Management, Healthcare/methods , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Midwifery , Mindfulness/methods , Obstetric Nursing/methods , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Occupational Stress/rehabilitation , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 35(2): 196-197, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900250
17.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 30(2): 115-23, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27104602

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is carried by up to one third of the general population; about 2% are carriers for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Infections caused by the antibiotic-resistant form include skin and soft tissue infections, as well as pneumonia, sepsis, and wound infections. Although the risks of hospital-associated systemic infections have decreased with attention to infection control procedures, serious obstetric illness remains a concern. This article describes the range of MRSA infection in the setting of pregnancy and discusses risks to both mother and newborn associated with active MRSA infection during pregnancy and childbirth. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus remains a risk to mothers and newborns, requiring prompt identification and appropriate management.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Staphylococcal Infections , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Patient Care Management/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/nursing , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/nursing , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy
18.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 29(2): 130-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25919603

ABSTRACT

Rates of induction of labor have risen rapidly since 1990, from 9.6% in that year to a peak of 23.8% of the 2010 singleton births in the United States. Even as the definition of term pregnancy has been refined to reflect the continuing maturation needs of the fetus, and mothers have been encouraged to "go the full forty," management strategies for pregnancy conditions that increase risk have included early induction. Labor induction should only be undertaken when there are specific indications for interrupting the normal processes of pregnancy. These indications may relate to maternal, fetal, or placental conditions or simply reflect the understanding that in all pregnancies, the placenta will eventually lose its ability to adequately provide oxygen, nutrition, and waste removal for the fetus. Patient safety-for both the mother and the child-can be improved when clinicians practice within clinical guidelines that follow the best available evidence and women are able to make informed decisions regarding plans for labor.


Subject(s)
Labor, Induced/standards , Nursing Care , Patient Safety/standards , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Nursing Care/methods , Nursing Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Risk Adjustment/methods
19.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 28(1): 32-40; quiz E1-2, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24476650

ABSTRACT

The rapidly increasing rates of obesity among women of childbearing age, not only in the United States but also across the globe, contribute to increased risks during pregnancy and childbirth. Overweight and obesity are quantified by body mass index (BMI) for clinical purposes. In 2010, 31.9% of U.S. women aged 20 to 39 years met the definition of obesity, a BMI of 30 kg/m or greater. Across the life span, obesity is associated with increased risks of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, sleep apnea, and other diseases. During pregnancy, increasing levels of prepregnancy BMI are associated with increases in both maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. This article reviews current knowledge about obesity in pregnancy and health risks related to increased maternal BMI, addresses weight stigma as a barrier to care and interventions that have evidence of benefit, and discusses the development of policies and guidelines to improve care.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/methods , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Welfare , Obesity/diagnosis , Postnatal Care/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Weight Gain
20.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 39(3): 367-72, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22963696

ABSTRACT

When building an integrated practice, the ability of each team member to work comfortably with other professionals is key. Midwives need to understand departmental expectations for participation in resident/student education, be willing to provide midwifery care in a high-acuity setting with limited opportunities for low-intervention care, and understand expectations for clinical leadership. Physicians need to build on the group expectation of mutual respect and best use of each group member. Confusion about midwifery and physician roles in maternity care still exists.


Subject(s)
Credentialing/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University , Interprofessional Relations , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Midwifery/organization & administration , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Faculty, Medical , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Maternal Health Services/standards , Midwifery/education , Models, Educational , Models, Organizational , Nurse Midwives/education , Obstetrics/education , Physician-Nurse Relations , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL