Formative qualitative research on the potential for digital solutions to address diabetes care gaps in Tanzania and Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes care remains unavailable and unaffordable for many people. Adapting models of care to low-income and middle-income country contexts is a priority. Digital technology offers substantial potential yet must surmount health system, technological and acceptability issues. This formative research aimed to identify the potential for a digital technology solution (Diabetes Compass) to address diabetes care gaps in primary healthcare. DESIGN: Qualitative research was conducted in selected districts of Sri Lanka and Tanzania with practitioners, patients and family members. In-depth interviews assessed how digital solutions may improve diabetes care, acceptability and usability; contextual and clinical observations identified practitioner clinical competencies, strengths and weaknesses, and the influence of the care environment on service delivery; and workshop discussions explored strategies to encourage digital solution uptake and sustain use. SETTING: The research was undertaken in 2022 at nine health facilities in Sri Lanka's Southern Province (Galle), and 16 health facilities in Tanzania's Lindi and Pwani Regions. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included primary and secondary care practitioners, facility managers, patients and family members. RESULTS: There was striking concordance in the diabetes care gaps and potential for digital solutions in the two countries, and between practitioners, patients and family members. Five main gaps were practitioner training; health information systems and data; service delivery; infrastructure, equipment and medication; and community awareness and knowledge. Practitioners, patients and family members saw strong potential for digital solutions to improve early detection, diagnosis, secondary prevention of complications and improve patients' and families' experience of living with diabetes. They identified specific design and implementation considerations to enable the Diabetes Compass to realistically meet these needs and overcome challenges. CONCLUSION: There was a strong appetite among practitioners, patients and family members for a digital solution to strengthen diabetes care. Their experience of challenges and practical recommendations informed the Diabetes Compass design.

WHO's support for COVID-19 research and knowledge management in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Health research, innovation and knowledge management remain major priorities of the WHO's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. WHO's Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO) supports priority research initiatives that address gaps in current knowledge regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a specific call for proposals, 122 research proposals were received and reviewed in 2020, of which 17 were recommended for funding from eight countries. Ten countries in the region participated in the global solidarity trial to assess potential therapies for COVID-19. In addition, WHO advocated for early serological and epidemiological investigations ('COVID-19 Unity Studies') on the general population, healthcare workers, pregnant women and neonates, and extending technical, financial and material support for them.Starting in early 2020, scholarly articles on COVID-19 have been published in every issue of the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal More than 6300 publications on COVID-19 were made available on the WHO knowledge management portal in the last year alone. WHO is also supporting countries in conducting studies to assess the field effectiveness of vaccines deployed nationally. To build and strengthen country capacities, regional webinars and intercountry meetings were conducted on research ethics, national health information systems and evidence-based health policy making. With support from WHO EMRO's new research and knowledge management pillar, countries in the region were well equipped to contribute to a global understanding of the novel virus's characteristics, as well as employ a national response based on informed evidence.

Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) control policies: global analysis of available legislation and equity considerations.

INTRODUCTION: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) offers guidance on evidence-based policies to reduce tobacco consumption and its burden of disease. Recently, it has provided guidance for alternative tobacco products, such as the waterpipe. Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) is prevalent worldwide and policies to address it need to take into consideration its specificities as a mode of smoking. In parallel, a growing body of literature points to the potential of evidence-based tobacco control policies to increase health inequities. This paper updates a previous global review of waterpipe tobacco policies and adds an equity lens to assess their impact on health inequities. METHODS: We reviewed policies that address WTS in 90 countries, including 10 with state-owned tobacco companies; 47 were included in our final analysis. We relied primarily on the Tobacco-Free Kids organisation's Tobacco Control Laws website, providing access to tobacco control laws globally. We categorised country tobacco policies by the clarity with which they defined and addressed waterpipe tobacco in relation to nine FCTC articles. We used the PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status and Social capital) framework for the equity analysis, by reviewing equity considerations referenced in the policies of each country and including prevalence data disaggregated by equity axis and country where available. RESULTS: Our results revealed very limited attention to waterpipe policies overall, and to equity in such policies, and highlight the complexity of regulating WTS. We recommend that WTS policies and surveillance centre equity as a goal. CONCLUSIONS: Our recommendations can inform global policies to reduce WTS and its health consequences equitably across population groups.