Safely Shifting MRIs for Seizure Evaluation to the Outpatient Setting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: When a patient is admitted for seizure-like activity, in addition to obtaining a thorough history and physical exam, the evaluation may include a neurology consultation, EEG, and brain MRI. The cost of an inpatient MRI is significant and only 2% of MRIs yield clinically significant findings. At our institution, there was a 20% increase in patients undergoing inpatient MRI from 2018 to 2020. Our aim: Decrease the percentage of patient encounters receiving inpatient brain MRIs for seizure evaluation from 50% to 40% in 6 months by safely shifting MRIs to the outpatient setting. METHODS: Initially, provider variability in ordering practices of MRIs was analyzed. Stakeholders were gathered and a local guideline was developed to standardize MRI utilization. A process map was created and highlighted barriers to obtaining an outpatient MRI. A new standard process was developed that streamlined and automated processes, and reduced delays and reliance on patients' families. RESULTS: Since implementation of the new clinical guideline, the percentage of inpatient MRIs ordered for patient encounters presenting with seizures and seizure-like episodes decreased from a mean of 50% to 26%. Significant reductions occurred for patients with complex febrile seizures, provoked but afebrile seizures, and unprovoked seizures. The MRI guideline recommendations were followed in 93% of encounters in the final 12 months. None of the patients who underwent outpatient MRI required readmission for acute findings. CONCLUSIONS: In this project, the percentage of inpatient MRIs was safely decreased with the implementation of a clinical guideline and standardized process.

Academic Achievement, Professionalism, and Burnout in Family Medicine Residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physician burnout has been shown to have roots in training environments. Whether burnout in residency is associated with the attainment of critical educational milestones has not been studied, and is the subject of this investigation. METHODS: We used data from a cohort of graduating family medicine residents registering for the 2019 American Board of Family Medicine initial certification examination with complete data from registration questionnaire, milestone data, in-training examination (ITE) scores, and residency characteristics. We used bivariate and multilevel multivariate analyses to measure the associations between four professionalism milestones ratings and ITE performance with burnout. RESULTS: Our sample included 2,509 residents; 36.8% met the criteria for burnout. Multilevel regression modeling showed a correlation between burnout and failure to meet only one of four professionalism milestones, specifically professional conduct and accountability (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87), while no statistically significant relationship was demonstrated between burnout and being in the lowest quartile of ITE scores. Other factors negatively associated with burnout included international medical education (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.76) and higher salary compared to cost of housing (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: We found significant association between self-reported burnout and failing to meet expectations for professional conduct and accountability, but no relationship between burnout and medical knowledge as measured by lower ITE performance. Further investigation of how this impacts downstream conduct and accountability behaviors is needed, but educators can use this information to examine program-level interventions that can specifically address burnout and development of physician professionalism.