Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 23(10): 1095-1106, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771270

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, including TNBC, which has limited options of treatment and poor prognosis. ICIs studied in TNBC include pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab. Initial studies exploring ICI monotherapy demonstrated promising yet limited responses. Subsequent studies, KEYNOTE 522 and KEYNOTE 355, which combined ICI with chemotherapy, have resulted in the FDA approval of pembrolizumab in the early-stage and metastatic setting, respectively. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a comprehensive review of the role of ICI in the treatment of TNBC. We reviewed the trials that have evaluated ICI monotherapy, dual therapy, ICI in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, vaccines and radiation. Additionally, we reviewed potential biomarkers of response and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A literature search was conducted via PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov as of 5 June 2023. EXPERT OPINION: Various approaches combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, vaccines and radiation have been assessed. Pembrolizumab remains the only ICI approved in both the early stage and mTNBC. The role of adjuvant pembrolizumab in those who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy is being investigated. Combining ICI with PARP inhibitors and radiation shows promise. More research is needed in identifying predictors of response. Monitoring of irAEs remains crucial.


Subject(s)
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Vaccines , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Vaccines/therapeutic use
2.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma ; 6(2): 215-223, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096354

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To improve understanding of intraocular pressure (IOP) and its variance, this project identifies systemic and ocular characteristics of healthy eyes of adult volunteers including IOP variation, ocular biometrics, and aqueous humor dynamics (AHDs). These data serve as baseline controls for further studies from the Eye Dynamics and Engineering Network (EDEN) Consortium. DESIGN: Multicenter open-label clinical trial in healthy adults randomized to 1 week treatment with 2 approved glaucoma drugs in a crossover design. PARTICIPANTS: Among 135 healthy participants, 122 participants (aged 55.2 ± 8.8 years; 92 females, 30 males) completed the protocol. METHODS: Participants from the University of Michigan, Mayo Clinic, and University of Nebraska Medical Center underwent measurements of ocular biometrics, AHD, and IOP using 4 tonometers. Intraocular pressure data during 3 study visits without glaucoma medications were used in the analysis. The PhenX Toolkit survey acquired standardized data on medical history, surgical history, medications, smoking and alcohol exposures, and physical measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The variability of IOP measurements within eyes was assessed as visit-to-visit IOP variation, within-visit IOP variation, and within-visit positional IOP variation. The concordance (or correlation) between eyes was also assessed. RESULTS: Average positional change of > 4.7 mmHg was detected with a range of 0.5-11.0 mmHg. Pearson correlation of IOP between eyes within a visit was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.91) for Goldmann applanation tonometry, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) for Icare rebound tonometry, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) for pneumatonometry. There was a 4% to 12% asymmetric fluctuation of 3 mmHg or more between eyes between visits using rebound tonometry, 9% with Goldmann applanation tonometry, and 3% to 4% by pneumotonometry. The coefficient of variation between visits for the same eye ranged from 11.2% to 12.9% for pneumatonometry, from 13.6% to 17.4% for rebound tonometry, and 15.8% to 16.2% for Goldmann applanation tonometry. CONCLUSIONS: The current study from the EDEN Consortium describes measurement methods and data analyses with emphasis on IOP variability. Future papers will focus on changes in ocular biometrics and AHD with timolol or latanoprost treatment. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Intraocular Pressure , Tonometry, Ocular
3.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(1): 117-120, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950398

ABSTRACT

We report a case of a woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus who developed persistent ataxia and was diagnosis with lupus cerebellitis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed T2/FLAIR signal hyperintensity within the cerebellar vermis without mass effect. The patient's condition improved with pulse IV methylprednisolone. This case highlights unique imaging findings within the cerebellum, our diagnostic and treatment regimen, and compares this case to previous literature on similar cases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...