Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
World Neurosurg ; 126: e1510-e1517, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30910753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastomas (GBMs) are primary brain tumors that are very difficult to treat. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the reference tool for diagnosis, postoperative control, and follow-up of GBM. The MRI tumor contrast enhancement part serves as a target for surgery. However, there are controversial data about the influence of pre- and postoperative tumor volumetric MRI parameters on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Data of 57 patients with GBM were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had maximum safe resection and standard adjuvant treatment. All patients underwent 1.5-T MRI with contrast in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The data of pre- and postoperative volumetric parameters were analyzed using the original software. RESULTS: Correlation analysis between the postoperative volume of the tumor contrast enhancement part and the patient's OS revealed a significant level (on the Chaddock scale) of inverse correlation. Residual tumor volume associated with OS of >6 months was determined as <2.5 cm3. The mortality risk in the first 6 months after tumor resection is 3.4 times higher when the tumor remnant is >2.5 cm3 (risk ratio, 3.4; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of MRI contrast-enhancing GBM remnants after surgery, automatically measured by the software, was a significant predictor for early postoperative progression and death.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , Automation , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Contrast Media , Female , Glioblastoma/mortality , Glioblastoma/surgery , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Software , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
2.
J Integr Bioinform ; 14(3)2017 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918420

ABSTRACT

Here we present the analysis of alternative splicing events on an example of glioblastoma cell culture samples using a set of computer tools in combination with database integration. The gene expression profiles of glioblastoma were obtained from cell culture samples of primary glioblastoma which were isolated and processed for RNA extraction. Transcriptome profiling of normal brain samples and glioblastoma were done by Illumina sequencing. The significant differentially expressed exon-level probes and their corresponding genes were identified using a combination of the splicing index method. Previous studies indicated that tumor-specific alternative splicing is important in the regulation of gene expression and corresponding protein functions during cancer development. Multiple alternative splicing transcripts have been identified as progression markers, including generalized splicing abnormalities and tumor- and stage-specific events. We used a set of computer tools which were recently applied to analysis of gene expression in laboratory animals to study differential splicing events. We found 69 transcripts that are differentially alternatively spliced. Three cancer-associated genes were considered in detail, in particular: APP (amyloid beta precursor protein), CASC4 (cancer susceptibility candidate 4) and TP53. Such alternative splicing opens new perspectives for cancer research.


Subject(s)
Alternative Splicing , Computational Biology/methods , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Glioma/genetics , Transcriptome/genetics , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Exons/genetics , Humans , Male , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Middle Aged , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
3.
World Neurosurg ; 90: 123-132, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26926798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Meningeal tumors are neoplasms with different histologic manifestations of both benign and malignant types that determine the prognosis of tumor recurrence and its consistency. The risk of surgical treatment depends on the location, size, and consistency of the tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences can be used to identify the features of tumors, but these MRI characteristics are not well understood. The present study describes an advanced mathematical algorithm to analyze MRI data and distinguish histologic types of meningeal tumors before surgery. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent surgical removal of meningeal brain tumor. All patients had preoperative MRI with a 1.5-T scanner. One radiologist and 2 neurosurgeons evaluated MRI histogram peaks of the whole tumor volume using the advanced computer algorithm. RESULTS: Three specialists received the following mean value of histogram peaks: 15.99 ± 0.23 (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) for meningoteliomatous meningiomas; 21.24 ± 0.3 (±SEM) for fibroplastic meningiomas; 19.0 ± 0.28 (±SEM) for transitional meningiomas; 10.7 ± 0.27 (±SEM) for anatypical, anaplastic meningiomas, 11.03 ± 0.51 (±SEM) for primary intracranial fibrosarcomas and 25.72 ± 0.29 (±SEM) for meningeal hemangiopericytomas. A one-way analysis of variance test proved the difference between group means: F = 70.138, P < 0.01. The Tukey test and the Games-Howell test indicated that the difference between the tumor groups was significant. Mean deviation in agreement index between specialists was 0.98 ± 0.007 (±SEM). CONCLUSIONS: The advanced algorithm proved high specificity, sensitivity, and interoperator repeatability.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Meningeal Neoplasms/pathology , Meningioma/diagnostic imaging , Meningioma/pathology , Software , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Machine Learning , Male , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Preoperative Care/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
World Neurosurg ; 82(5): e649-55, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25009166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report the analysis of 3 cases of ancient trepanation discovered in the craniological collection (153 skulls) of the Pazyryk nomadic culture (500-300 bc) from the Gorny Altai, Russia, and to evaluate the technique, instrumentation, and materials used for cranial surgery as well as the motivation for the trepanations in Scythian times. METHODS: A multidisciplinary approach was chosen to study the trepanned skulls. Visual inspection and examination under magnification, multislice computed tomography, high-field magnetic resonance imaging, and coupled plasma mass spectrometry and synchrotron radiation-induced x-ray fluorescence analysis of the bone samples from the site of trephination were used. RESULTS: In the Pazyryk culture, trepanation was very likely used to perform the intracranial procedures that were not yet indicated by Hippocrates. No signs of bone infection were detected. Higher copper abundance found at the site of trepanation showed that a bronze knife was the most likely tool used by Scythian surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the Scythian population of the Altai Mountains had sufficient medical knowledge to perform sophisticated and successful manipulations on the human skulls. Scraping technique with bronze tools was quite effective for prevention of wound infection and resulted in a high survival rate after surgery. In the era of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, it may be useful to consider some ancient surgical technologies.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgery/history , Paleopathology , Surgical Instruments/history , Trephining/history , Copper , Greece, Ancient , History, Ancient , Humans , Neurosurgery/instrumentation , Russia , Trephining/instrumentation
5.
World Neurosurg ; 77(2): 252-6, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22387212

ABSTRACT

There is archaeological evidence that the first neurosurgical procedure in what is now known as Siberia was performed in 8005 ± 100 B.C. According to signs of bone growth, perhaps more than half of the individuals who received the ancient trepanations survived. In Siberia, the first operations on the human brain and spinal cord were performed in 1909 at Tomsk University Hospital by the outstanding Russian surgeon and professor Vladimir M. Mysh. Professor Mysh initially moved from Saint Petersburg to Tomsk and later to Novosibirsk. Nicolay N. Burdenko, the founder of Russian neurosurgery and the Moscow Neurosurgical Institution, began his medical education at the Tomsk Imperial University. In the 1950s, Professor Ksenia I. Kharitonova exerted her great influence upon the development of neurosurgery in Siberia. Since 1955, and for 30 years thereafter, Professor Kharitonova was recognized as a principal leader of Siberian neurosurgery. She applied every effort to spread neurosurgical knowledge, and she popularized best practices around Siberia and the Far East. Perestroika deconstructed and ultimately eliminated the orderly system of neurosurgical service in the Soviet Union. From another perspective, the process opened the window to the world. Fully equipped centers and clinics with state-of-the-art techniques for neuro-oncology, cerebrovascular diseases, neurotrauma, and spinal pathology management in Novosibirsk, Barnaul, Kemerovo, and Irkutsk were enabled.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgery/history , Archaeology , Craniotomy , Disinfection , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Neurosurgery/trends , Siberia , USSR
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...