Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 52: 28-31, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition is underdiagnosed and undertreated in Norway. In a revision of a national guideline on malnutrition, the Norwegian Directorate of Health aimed for a harmonization and standardization of the malnutrition screening practice, including a recommendation of one malnutrition screening tool to be used among all adults in Norwegian health and care services. METHODS: A working group was appointed by the Norwegian Directorate of Health. Evidence-based practice, a pragmatic decision-making process based on a literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and the DECIDE decision-making model was used as a guidance in order to convert evidence into recommendations. RESULTS: The criteria and properties of the four most frequently validated malnutrition screening tools were identified and ranked by the working group. The tools were prioritized in the following order: 1: Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), 2: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), 3: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), and 4: Mini-Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA). CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian Directorate of Health recommends use of MST for screening for malnutrition among all adults (≥18 years), across all health care settings, and diagnoses or conditions in Norway.


Subject(s)
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Adult , Humans , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Norway
2.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 52: 32-49, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Norwegian Directorate of Health has identified a need to harmonize and standardize the malnutrition screening practice in Norwegian hospitals and primary health care settings, in order to provide a seamless communication of malnutrition screening along the patient pathway. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the validity and reliability of screening tools used to identify risk of malnutrition across health care settings, diagnoses or conditions and adult age groups, as a first step towards a national recommendation of one screening tool. METHODS: A systematic literature search for articles evaluating validity, agreement, and reliability of malnutrition screening tools, published up to August 2020, was conducted in: MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Cinahl, Cochrane Databases, Web of Science, Epistemonikos, SveMed+, and Norart. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022300558). For critical appraisal of each included article, the Quality Criteria Checklist by The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics was used. RESULTS: The review identified 105 articles that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most frequently validated tools were Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). MNA, MST and NRS-2002 displayed overall moderate validity, and MUST low validity. All four tools displayed low agreement. MST and MUST were validated across health care settings and age groups. In general, data on reliability was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The screening tools MST and NRS-2002 displayed moderate validity for the identification of malnutrition in adults, of which MST is validated across health care settings. In addition, MNA has moderate validity for the identification of malnutrition in adults 65 years or older.


Subject(s)
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Adult , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Reference Standards
3.
Eur Heart J ; 37(17): 1398-405, 2016 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26586781

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Untreated familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) increases the risk of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study investigated the presence of CVD in FH patients at the time of death. METHODS AND RESULTS: The presence of CVD, lipid profile, medical treatment, and cause of death was characterized in all deceased Norwegian FH patients, of whom we had access to medical records (n = 79, from 1989 to 2010). The mean age at first CVD event was 44 years. The mean age at the time of death was 60 years. Cardiovascular disease was the cause of 50% of the deaths. At the time of death, 93% of the FH patients had established CVD and 69% had experienced myocardial infarction. The FH patients were divided into two groups (cut-off 60 years); FH patients who died at a younger age (mean age 51 years) and at an older age (mean age 71 years). More of the younger FH patients received statins (98 vs. 81%, P = 0.038), and fewer received niacin (0 vs. 17%, P = 0.019) compared with the older patients. The last measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was higher in the younger patients compared with the older FH patients (5.3 vs. 4.4 mmol/L, P = 0.033). There were more current smokers among the younger FH patients compared with the older patients (55 vs. 10%, P = 0.001). Interestingly, there were no sex differences in age at the first CVD event or age at the time of death. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular disease is present in most FH patients at the time of death, underscoring the severity of FH and the need for early diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Lipoproteins, LDL
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...