Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(12): 1439-1449, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408285

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Imatinib resistance in GI stromal tumors (GISTs) is primarily caused by secondary KIT mutations, and clonal heterogeneity of these secondary mutations represents a major treatment obstacle. KIT inhibitors used after imatinib have clinical activity, albeit with limited benefit. Ripretinib is a potent inhibitor of secondary KIT mutations in the activation loop (AL). However, clinical benefit in fourth line remains limited and the molecular mechanisms of ripretinib resistance are largely unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Progressing lesions of 25 patients with GISTs refractory to ripretinib were sequenced for KIT resistance mutations. Resistant genotypes were validated and characterized using novel cell line models and in silico modeling. RESULTS: GISTs progressing on ripretinib were enriched for secondary mutations in the ATP-binding pocket (AP), which frequently occur in cis with preexisting AL mutations, resulting in highly resistant AP/AL genotypes. AP/AL mutations were rarely observed in a cohort of progressing GIST samples from the preripretinib era but represented 50% of secondary KIT mutations in patients with tumors resistant to ripretinib. In GIST cell lines harboring secondary KIT AL mutations, the sole genomic escape mechanisms during ripretinib drug selection were AP/AL mutations. Ripretinib and sunitinib synergize against mixed clones with secondary AP or AL mutants but do not suppress clones with AP/AL genotypes. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that KIT remains the central oncogenic driver even in late lines of GIST therapy. KIT-inhibitor combinations may suppress resistance because of secondary KIT mutations. However, the emergence of KIT AP/AL mutations after ripretinib treatment calls for new strategies in the development of next-generation KIT inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Naphthyridines , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit , Urea , Humans , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Urea/analogs & derivatives
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(22)2022 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36428589

ABSTRACT

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in GIST is of interest for the detection of heterogeneous resistance mutations and treatment monitoring. However, methodologies for use in a local setting are not standardized and are error-prone and difficult to interpret. We established a workflow to evaluate routine tumor tissue NGS (Illumina-based next generation sequencing) panels and pipelines for ctDNA sequencing in an academic setting. Regular blood collection (Sarstedt) EDTA tubes were sufficient for direct processing whereas specialized tubes (STRECK) were better for transportation. Mutation detection rate was higher in automatically extracted (AE) than manually extracted (ME) samples. Sensitivity and specificity for specific mutation detection was higher using digital droplet (dd)PCR compared to NGS. In a retrospective analysis of NGS and clinical data (133 samples from 38 patients), cfDNA concentration correlated with tumor load and mutation detection. A clinical routine pipeline and a novel research pipeline yielded different results, but known and resistance-mediating mutations were detected by both and correlated with the resistance spectrum of TKIs used. In conclusion, NGS routine panel analysis was not sensitive and specific enough to replace solid biopsies in GIST. However, more precise methods (hybridization capture NGS, ddPCR) may comprise important research tools to investigate resistance. Future clinical trials need to compare methodology and protocols.

3.
Water Res ; 210: 117931, 2022 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996014

ABSTRACT

Ozonation is nowadays a widely used method in drinking water treatment for disinfection and pollutant control. However, transformation products of ozonation can be more toxic than their parent compounds. Therefore, the knowledge of the reaction mechanisms and product formation is essential for a safe application. Different analytical methods such as high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) can be applied to elucidate products and primary attack positions of oxidation agents such as ozone. During the investigation of the ozonation of phenolic compounds in water by CSIA, a reaction rate depending carbon isotope fractionation was observed. The fractionation strongly depends on the phenol speciation. With decreasing pH values and reaction rates <105 M-1 s-1, the isotope enrichment factor ε increases (ε is between -5.2 and -1.0‰). For faster reactions (>105 M-1 s-1), the carbon isotope enrichment was not significant anymore (ε is between -1.0 and 0‰). Based on these data a concept to correlate isotope enrichment factors with kinetic data for aromatic compounds is proposed. The additional investigation of aliphatic double and triple bonds did not fit this correlation suggesting different rate-limiting steps. However, double and triple bond showed a similar enrichment factor, which implies the same rate-limiting step in the reaction with ozone, the monodentate addition of ozone.


Subject(s)
Ozone , Water Purification , Carbon Isotopes/analysis , Chemical Fractionation , Phenols
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...