Comparative efficacy and safety of alpha-blockers as monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Despite the availability of various drugs for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), alpha(α)-blockers are the preferred first-line treatment. However, there remains a scarcity of direct comparisons among various α-blockers. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of α-blockers in the management of BPH. A comprehensive electronic search covered PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library until August 2023. The primary endpoints comprised international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual volume (PVR), while treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered as secondary endpoints. This NMA synthesized evidence from 22 studies covering 3371 patients with six kinds of α-blockers with 12 dose categories. IPSS has been considerably improved by tamsulosin 0.4 mg, naftopidil 50 mg and silodosin 8 mg as compared to the placebo. Based on the p-score, tamsulosin 0.4 mg had the highest probability of ranking for IPSS, PVR, and Qmax, whereas doxazosin 8 mg had the highest probability of improving QoL. A total of 297 adverse events were reported among all the α-blockers, silodosin has reported a notable number of TEAEs. Current evidence supports α-blockers are effective in IPSS reduction and are considered safer. Larger sample size with long-term studies are needed to refine estimates of IPSS, QoL, PVR, and Qmax outcomes in α-blocker users.

Venetoclax adverse event monitoring: a safety meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and a retrospective evaluation of the FAERS.

Concerns persist about venetoclax's long-term safety in larger populations, with limited evidence of infrequent and delayed adverse events (AEs). The study integrated safety data on venetoclax in leukemia patients from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and FDA adverse event monitoring system (FAERS). We systematically reviewed RCTs reporting safety outcomes of venetoclax in adult leukemia patients of any gender, either monotherapy or in combination, applying advanced search on databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov. The quality assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We utilized a random effect meta-analysis to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Open Vigil 2.1 MedDRAv24 was used to search the FAERS database, with data available until September 2023. The disproportionality was calculated using the proportional reporting ratio and the reporting odds ratio. The study protocol for meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO; CRD42022378006. For the safety meta-analysis, seven RCTs with available AEs were examined. A total of 942 AEs were found associated with the venetoclax group; 79% of them were in grade three or above. Venetoclax significantly increased the risk of neutropenia grade three or above (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.64, p: 0.0033) compared with the control group. In FAERS, 26,436 patients were reported with AEs associated with venetoclax. Significant signal scores were observed in hematological, cardiac, vascular, and gastrointestinal disorders. 11 out of 30 generated signals, failed to meet the signal criteria upon refinement. The current study updated and improved the safety profile of venetoclax in the post-marketing period, assisting in risk evaluation and mitigation for the best possible patient health care.

The Possible Role of Selected Vitamins and Minerals in the Therapeutic Outcomes of Leishmaniasis.

Leishmaniasis is a protozoal disease declared as an endemic in areas suffering from severe malnutrition and poverty. The factors associated with poverty like low income, ecological factors, and malnutrition cause disruption in immunity and host defense increasing risk of infection. Altered resistance to infection and host susceptibility are associated with low micronutrient levels in undernourished patients. Malnutrition has been recognized as a poor predictive marker for leishmaniasis, in particular the deficiency of trace elements like zinc, iron, and vitamin A, B, C, D which has a prominent function in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity, cell proliferation, human physiology, etc. Malnourishment can exacerbate host sensitivity and pathophysiologic intensity to infection in variety of ways, whereas infection can enhance underlying poor nutrition or enhance host vulnerability and sandfly's urge to attack specific hosts. The intensity of leishmaniasis can be influenced by body mass and micronutrient availability in the blood. Vitamin D, C, zinc, and iron are proved effective in inhibiting the growth of leishmaniasis in both amastigote or promastigote forms, either directly or by acting as precursor for a pathway which inhibits the parasite growth. This article elucidates a new perception to the crucial role of micronutrients and their probable role in the therapeutic outcomes of leishmaniasis. Since there is requirement of novel drugs to fight drug resistance and relapse of leishmaniasis, this article may pave way to understand the importance of micronutrients and their role in therapeutic outcomes of leishmaniasis.