ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The rather broad definition of medical trauma within DSM-IV has contributed to long-lasting debates on the applicability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in oncological patients and its differentiation from Adjustment Disorder (AjD) which results from non-traumatic critical life events. The DSM-5 criteria have introduced a narrower definition of medical traumatization. However, studies on updated prevalence rates in cancer patients are missing. METHODS: Within a cross-sectional study, we assessed hematological cancer survivors using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5. We investigated (i) the frequency and type of cancer-related stressors, (ii) the proportion of stressors qualifying as traumatic according to DSM-5 (i.e., an event of sudden and catastrophic character) and (iii) the prevalence of PTSD, AjD and cancer-related PTSD according to DSM-5. RESULTS: 291 patients participated (response rate: 58%). Mean age was 54 years, 60% were male. 168 patients (59%) reported cancer-related stressors, with the most frequent being cancer diagnosis disclosure (n = 58, 27%). Eight percent of reported stressors qualified as traumatic events according to DSM-5. Five (1.8%), 15 (5.3%) and 20 (7.0%) cancer survivors met DSM-5 criteria for current PTSD, lifetime PTSD and AjD, respectively. Among all PTSD cases, three were cancer-related (1.1%). In addition, seven patients (2.5%) met all symptoms for cancer-related PTSD, but not the DSM-5 criterion for medical trauma. Considering receiving the cancer diagnosis as traumatic event, which is debatable according to DSM-5, 38% of stressors qualified as traumatic and six patients (2.1%) met criteria for cancer-related PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: DSM-5 criteria enable a clear identification of traumatic events in the context of cancer. This change may inform discussions on the appropriateness of PTSD in cancer patients and facilitates its differentiation from AjD. Larger studies need to validate our findings.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and adjustment disorder (AjD) are common in hematological cancer patients as they face severe stressors during their serious disease and often intensive treatment, such as stem cell transplantation (SCT). Aims of the present study were to provide frequency and risk factors for PTSD and AjD based on updated diagnostic criteria that are lacking to date. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, hematological cancer patients were assessed for stressor-related symptoms via validated self-report questionnaires based on updated criteria for PTSD (PCL-5) and AjD (ADMN-20). Frequency and symptom severity were estimated among the total sample and SCT subgroups (allogeneic, autologous, no SCT). SCT subgroups were compared using Chi-squared-tests and ANOVAs. Linear regression models investigated sociodemographic and medical factors associated with symptomatology. RESULTS: In total, 291 patients were included (response rate: 58%). 26 (9.3%), 66 (23.7%) and 40 (14.2%) patients met criteria for cancer-related PTSD, subthreshold PTSD and AjD, respectively. Symptom severity and frequency of criteria-based PTSD and AjD did not differ between SCT subgroups (all p > 0.05). Factors associated with elevated symptomatology were younger age (PTSD: p < 0.001; AjD: p = 0.02), physical comorbidity (PTSD: p < 0.001; AjD: p < 0.001) and active disease (PTSD: p = 0.12; AjD: p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Based on new criteria, a considerable part of hematological cancer patients reports PTSD and AjD symptoms. Younger patients and patients with physical symptom burden might be particularly at risk and need to be monitored closely to enable effective treatment at an early stage.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Adjustment Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Fear of cancer progression and recurrence (FoP) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are syndromes commonly seen in cancer patients. This study applied network analysis to investigate how symptoms of both concepts are interconnected. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from hematological cancer survivors. A regularized Gaussian graphical model including symptoms of FoP (FoP-Q) and GAD (GAD-7) was estimated. We investigated (i) the overall network structure and (ii) tested on pre-selected items whether both syndromes could be differentiated based on their worry content (cancer related vs. generalized). For this purpose, we applied a metric named bridge expected influence (BEI). Lower values mean that an item is only weakly connected with the items of the other syndrome, which can be an indication of its distinctive characteristic. RESULTS: Out of 2001 eligible hematological cancer survivors, 922 (46%) participated. The mean age was 64 years and 53% were female. The mean partial correlation within each construct (GAD: r = .13; FoP: r = .07) was greater than between both (r = .01). BEI values among items supposed to discriminate between the constructs (e.g., worry about many things within GAD and fear not to endure treatment within FoP) were among the smallest so our assumptions were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings based on the network analysis support the hypothesis that FoP and GAD are different concepts within oncology. Our exploratory data needs to be validated in future longitudinal studies.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anxiety/etiology , Fear , Neoplasms/therapy , SurvivorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Even though the number of hematological cancer survivors suffering from long-term and late consequences of their disease is growing, knowledge about their situation regarding partnership, sexuality, and fertility-related communication is sparse to date. METHODS: We recruited survivors of hematological malignancies (≥ 3 years after diagnosis) from two cancer registries in Germany. We applied validated instruments and study-specific items on satisfaction with partnership, sexual functioning, and fertility-related communication with physicians. We provided descriptive statistics and conducted multiple regression analyses to identify associations of the outcomes with patient factors and well-being (anxiety, depression, and quality of life). RESULTS: Of 2001 eligible survivors, 922 (46%) participated. Fifty-seven percent were male, and the mean age was 64 years. Ninety percent and 60% reported to be satisfied with their partnership and sexual life, respectively. However, 81% and 86% reported being sexually impaired by physical or mental symptoms, respectively. Seventy-four percent of those with incomplete family planning had a fertility-related conversation with a physician. Female gender (p < .05, Beta = - .09), older age (p < .01, Beta = .10), and chemotherapy (p < .01, Beta = .10) were associated with less sexual pleasure caused by physical impairment. Satisfaction with partnership (p < .001, Beta = .22), satisfaction with sexual life (p < .001, Beta = .28), and conversation about fertility (p < .05, Beta = .26) were associated with better quality of life. CONCLUSION: Even though long-term survivors seem to be generally satisfied with their partnership and sexual life, they may suffer from specific impairments. Our findings need to be verified in longitudinal studies.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Sexuality , Survivors , Fertility , Communication , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In order to optimize psycho-oncological care, studies that quantify the extent of distress and identify certain risk groups are needed. Among patients with prostate cancer (PCa), findings on depression and anxiety are limited. METHODS: We analyzed data of PCa patients selected from a German multi-center study. Depression and anxiety were assessed with the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 (cut-off ≥7). We provided physical symptom burden, calculated absolute and relative risk (AR and RR) of depression and anxiety across patient subsets and between patients and the general population (GP) and tested age as a moderator within the relationship of disease-specific symptoms with depression and anxiety. RESULTS: Among 636 participants, the majority reported disease-specific problems (sexuality: 60%; urination: 52%). AR for depression and anxiety was 23% and 22%, respectively. Significant RR were small, with higher risks of distress in patients who are younger (eg, RRdepression = 1.15; 95%-CI: 1.06-1.26), treated with chemotherapy (RRdepression = 1.46; 95%-CI: 1.09-1.96) or having metastases (RRdepression = 1.30; 95%-CI: 1.02-1.65). Risk of distress was slightly elevated compared to GP (eg, RRdepression = 1.13; 95%-CI: 1.07-1.19). Age moderated the relationship between symptoms and anxiety (Burination = -0.10, P = .02; Bsexuality = -0.11, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients, those with metastases or treatment with chemotherapy seem to be at elevated risk for distress and should be closely monitored. Many patients suffer from disease-specific symptom burden, by which younger patients seem to be particularly distressed. Support of coping mechanisms associated with disease-specific symptom burden seems warranted.
Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , SexualityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To date, no German instrument exists to assess subjective levels of cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) in cancer survivors. We translated the validated Attentional Function Index (AFI) into German and explored its psychometric properties. METHODS: The validation sample consisted of 1,111 haematological cancer survivors mainly recruited from two cancer registries. Factorial structure was explored using principal component analysis, internal consistency via Cronbach's α, construct validity through correlational analyses (Pearson's r) and associations of patient characteristics with the AFI score via regression analyses. RESULTS: In line with the original version, we revealed three factors, that is "effective action" (seven items), "attentional lapses" (three items) and "interpersonal effectiveness" (three items). The overall reliability α was .91. Verifying construct validity, the AFI score correlated positively with cognitive functioning (r = .64, p ≤ .01) and global QoL (r = .44, p ≤ .01), but negatively with fatigue (r = -.60, p ≤ .01) and depressive symptomatology (r = -.6, p ≤ .01). Older age (ß = .12, p < .001), higher comorbidity (ß = -.07, p = .02) and being male patient (ß = .07, p = .01) were significantly associated with the AFI scores, but effect sizes were small. CONCLUSION: The German translation of the AFI shows good psychometric properties and thus may be reasonably applied to measure the subjective level of CRCI in German-speaking oncological populations.
Subject(s)
Attention , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms , Aged , Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Depression/psychology , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Fatigue/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , TranslationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Fear of progression (FoP) is a frequent symptom among cancer patients, but data among hematological cancer survivors are scarce. Furthermore, theory assumes that FoP serves as link between bodily symptoms and different aspects of quality of life. However, this model has not been tested with the bodily symptom cancer-related fatigue (CRF) so far. Therefore, we investigated (i) levels of FoP stratified by type of and time since diagnosis and (ii) whether FoP mediates relationships of CRF with physical functioning (PF) and global quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited long-term survivors of hematological malignancies (mean time since diagnosis: 9â¯years) via two regional cancer registries. We applied analyses of (co-)variance and mediation analyses to identify indirect effects. RESULTS: 922 survivors participated. There was no overall effect of type of diagnosis on FoP (Fconditionalâ¯=â¯1.6, pâ¯=â¯.15). However, we found an overall effect of time since diagnosis on FoP (Fconditionalâ¯=â¯8.5, pâ¯<â¯.001), with FoP being significantly elevated in the group closest to diagnosis. As hypothesized, we found an indirect (mediating) effect of FoP in the associations of CRF with QoL (ßâ¯=â¯-0.13, 97.5 %-CIâ¯=â¯[-0.17; -0.09]) and PF (ßâ¯=â¯-0.12, 97.5 %-CIâ¯=â¯[-0.17; -0.08]). CONCLUSION: Among long-term survivors of hematological malignancies, a shorter time since diagnosis seems to be associated with elevated levels of FoP. Addressing FoP in psycho-oncological interventions may help to buffer the detrimental effects of CRF. However, longitudinal data is needed to validate our findings.
Subject(s)
Fatigue/psychology , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , SurvivorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trauma- and stressor-related disorders pose an important threat for patients with medical conditions by negatively affecting the outcomes of the underlying somatic disease. Nevertheless, research on distress in the course of hematological cancer is sparse to date. For this patient group, however, treatment is often more toxic and invasive than for other cancer populations. A subgroup of these patients is treated with stem cell transplantation (SCT) which is associated with many stressors including spatial isolation or fear of life-threatening complications. Existing results are inconsistent and primarily based on self-report questionnaires and small samples. Moreover, diagnostic criteria of trauma- and stressor-related disorders have recently been updated. METHODS: This German cross-sectional study will recruit at total of 600 hematological cancer patients, of which 300 will have undergone either autologous or allogeneic SCT. Participants will be assessed for trauma- and stressor-related disorders (adjustment disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder) using a structured clinical interview (SCID-5) based on updated diagnostic criteria. Qualitative investigation of the reported stressors will be used for differential diagnostic investigations and to examine which stressors are experienced as most distressing. Additionally, severity of distress (i.e., general distress as well as anxious, depressive and stressor-related symptomatology) will be assessed by validated questionnaires. We will (i) provide the prevalence of trauma- and stressor-related disorders, (ii) investigate medical and sociodemographic risk factors and (iii) compare the levels of distress within the patient group (SCT vs. non-SCT) and between patients and age- and gender-matched reference groups from the German general population. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the prevalence of stressor-related disorders and the level of distress among hematological cancer patients across different treatment settings. Identification of medical and sociodemographic risk factors will help to closely monitor patients with a high risk of distress and to deliver psycho-oncological treatment as soon as possible. Comparisons between patients and norm values will be used to identify the need for psycho-oncological treatment in subgroups of hematological patients and thus help to further develop and implement tailored psycho-oncological interventions.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background/Objective: Cancer and its treatment can have a detrimental impact on psychological well-being. Acceptance as the basis of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown beneficial effects on depression and anxiety. However, its relationship to fatigue and cognitive impairment has not been investigated. A protective effect of acceptance may open up a new target for psychological intervention. Method: A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken. 922 hematological cancer survivors (≥ 2.5 years post diagnosis) were recruited through two regional cancer registries in Germany. Acceptance (AAQ-II), fatigue (BFI) and subjective cognitive impairment (AFI) were assessed. Results: Higher levels of acceptance were negatively associated with fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment (R2 = .34 and R2 = .26, respectively). The relationship between fatigue and fatigue-related impairment of daily life was weaker for survivors with high acceptance. Conclusions: Acceptance is strongly associated with fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment. ACT may be useful to reduce symptoms of fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment in cancer survivors.
Antecedentes/Objetivo: El cáncer y su tratamiento pueden tener un impacto perjudicial sobre el bienestar psicológico. La aceptación, base de la terapia de aceptación y compromiso (ACT), ha mostrado efectos beneficiosos sobre la depresión y la ansiedad. Sin embargo, su relación con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo no ha sido investigada. Un efecto protector de la aceptación puede abrir un nuevo objetivo para la intervención psicológica.Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal de encuesta por correo. Un total de 922 supervivientes al cáncer hematológico (≥ 2,5 años después del diagnóstico) fueron reclutados a través de dos registros regionales en Alemania. Se evaluaron la aceptación (AAQ-II), la fatiga (BFI) y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo (AFI).Resultados: Los niveles elevados de aceptación se asociaron negativamente con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo (R2 = 0,34 y R2 = 0,26, respectivamente). La relación entre fatiga y deterioro ede la vida diaria relacionado con la fatiga fue más débil en supervivientes con una mayor aceptación.Conclusiones: La aceptación se asocia fuertemente con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo. La ACT puede ser útil para reducir los síntomas de fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo en supervivientes al cáncer.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objective: Cancer and its treatment can have a detrimental impact on psychological well-being. Acceptance as the basis of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown beneficial effects on depression and anxiety. However, its elationship to fatigue and cognitive impairment has not been investigated. A protective effect of acceptance may open up a new target for psychological intervention. Method: A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken. 922 hematological cancer survivors (≥ 2.5 years post diagnosis) were recruited through two regional cancer registries in Germany. Acceptance (AAQ-II), fatigue (BFI) and subjective cognitive impairment (AFI) were assessed. Results: Higher levels of acceptance were negatively associated with fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment (R2= .34 and R2= .26, respectively). The relationship between fatigue and fatigue-related impairment of daily life was weaker for survivors with high acceptance. Conclusions: Acceptance is strongly associated with fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment. ACT may be useful to reduce symptoms of fatigue and subjective cognitive impairment in cancer survivors
Antecedentes/Objetivo: El cáncer y su tratamiento pueden tener un impacto perjudicial sobre el bienestar psicológico. La aceptación, base de la terapia de aceptación y compromiso (ACT), ha mostrado efectos beneficiosos sobre la depresión y la ansiedad. Sin embargo, su relación con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo no ha sido investigada. Un efecto protector de la aceptación puede abrir un nuevo objetivo para la intervención psicológica. Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal de encuesta por correo. Un total de 922 supervivientes al cáncer hematológico (≥ 2,5 años después del diagnóstico) fueron reclutados a través de dos registros regionales en Alemania. Se evaluaron la aceptación (AAQ-II), la fatiga (BFI) y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo (AFI). Resultados: Los niveles elevados de aceptación se asociaron negativamente con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo (R2= 0,34 y R2= 0,26, respectivamente). La relación entre fatiga y deterioro ede la vida diaria relacionado con la fatiga fue más débil en supervivientes con una mayor aceptación. Conclusiones: La aceptación se asocia fuertemente con la fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo. La ACT puede ser útil para reducir los síntomas de fatiga y el deterioro cognitivo subjetivo en supervivientes al cáncer
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Mental Fatigue/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Acceptance and Commitment Therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of hematologic cancer patients outlive 10 years past diagnosis. Nevertheless, few studies investigated psychological strain in this patient group beyond 5 years after diagnosis. We conducted a registry-based investigation of risk for depression and anxiety among long-term hematologic cancer survivors up to 26 years after diagnosis compared to the general population. METHODS: In this cross-sectional postal survey, cancer survivors were recruited through 2 regional cancer registries in Germany. Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) were assessed. Survivor data were compared to age- and gender-matched comparison groups (CG) randomly drawn from large representative samples (N > 5,000). RESULTS: Out of 2,001 eligible patients, 46% participated (n = 922). Survivors were significantly more likely than the CG to report elevated depressive (relative risk [RR] = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4.3) and anxious symptomatology (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3). Depression scores remained high even in the survivor Group 12-26 years after diagnosis. RR for anxiety decreased to values comparable to the CG. Younger and middle-aged survivors (≤65 years) were at highest relative and absolute risk to be psychologically impaired. CONCLUSION: This study shows that depression rather than anxiety is a prominent problem in long-term survivors of hematologic cancer. The results stress the importance of monitoring patients even years after diagnosing and supplying psychosocial support to patients in need. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Registries , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Quality of life (QoL) has become an important tool to guide decision making in oncology. Given the heterogeneity among hematological cancer survivors, however, clinicians need comparative data across different subsets. METHODS: This study recruited survivors of hematological malignancies (≥2.5 years after diagnosis) from 2 German cancer registries. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30. The sample was stratified by cancer type, time since diagnosis, treatment with stem cell transplantation (SCT) and type of SCT. First, levels of QoL were compared across subsamples when controlling for several covariates. Second, we contrasted subsamples with gender- and age-matched population controls obtained from the general population. RESULTS: Of 2001 survivors contacted by mail, 922 (46%) participated in the study. QoL did not significantly differ between the subsamples. All subsamples scored significantly lower in functioning and significantly higher in symptom burden compared to population controls (all P < .001). Almost all of these group effects reached clinically meaningful sizes (Cohen's d ≥ .5). Group differences in global health/QoL were mostly non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hematological cancer survivors are associated with practically relevant impairments irrespective of differences in central medical characteristics. Nevertheless, survivors seem to evaluate their overall situation as relatively well.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Public Health Surveillance , Registries , Socioeconomic Factors , Stem Cell Transplantation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an intervention representing a transdiagnostic and contextual approach that assumes that psychological suffering is caused by experiential avoidance. The primary intention of ACT is not to eliminate symptoms and to treat mental disorders. Instead, ACT aims to increase psychological flexibility, i. e. to broaden the repertoire of cognitions and behaviors when facing inner and outer aversive events or experiences. Psychological flexibility can be enhanced by working with the 6 core components of the ACT model. Experience-focused methods like metaphors and exercises for acceptance play a crucial role in the therapeutic work. In short, with ACT patients can learn: ⪠that rigid and inflexible attempts to fight aversive experience are problematic ⪠a mindful experience of inner and outer experience ⪠to differentiate between unchangeable and changeable events (acceptance) ⪠to identify values or respectively life goals and to behave in a way that is consistent with them (commitment)The therapeutic focus of ACT is to create a balance between acceptance and behavioral change consistent with chosen values. Chronic diseases are often associated with aversive inner and outer experiences. A growing number of studies support the efficacy of ACT. There is evidence that ACT can increase psychological flexibility and potentially also lead to better self-management within the context of chronic somatic diseases.
Subject(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/methods , Chronic Disease/psychology , Chronic Disease/therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Due to toxicity and invasiveness, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation causes severe and longstanding symptom burden. Longitudinal studies on symptoms and symptom clusters (SC) would be helpful to optimize symptom control but are rare to date. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate stability of symptoms, extract time stable SC, and determine their priority in symptom management. METHODS: In this multicenter study, patients diagnosed with hematologic cancer were assessed before conditioning (T0) and three months (T1), one year (T2), and five years (T3) after transplantation. Symptoms were assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Symptoms were stable when rated as present at three consecutive time points. Applying factor analysis, stable SC were composed of symptoms loading on the same factor across all time points. Priority in symptom management was derived from a combination of severity and predictive power for quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine patients participated at T0, 150 (63%) at T1, 102 (43%) at T2, and 45 (19%) at T3. We identified three stable SC, composed of rest-tired-weak-dyspnea-loss of appetite (exhausted), tense-worried-irritable-depressed (affective), and nausea-vomiting (gastrointestinal). Fatigue was most persistent and also most severe and predictive for QoL, both as symptom and in cluster (exhausted). CONCLUSION: Given its high stability, severity, and impact on QoL, fatigue should have priority in symptom management. The treatment of this symptom could be enhanced by also incorporating interventions addressing dyspnea and loss of appetite.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Survivors , Disease Progression , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both incidence and survival rates of hematological cancers are increasing, leading to a growing number of survivors with specific late and long-term effects. However, relevant research in physical, psychological and social aspects of quality of life is scarce. Existing literature shows that a considerable number of cancer survivors report a relatively high quality of life despite a variety of adverse and persistent symptoms. To date, the reasons for this phenomenon as well as moderating and mediating factors are widely unknown. Given these research gaps, we aim to investigate the different domains of quality of life among long-term survivors of hematological cancers and to identify factors predicting high quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a large cross-sectional study among hematological cancer survivors at a minimum of 3 years after diagnosis. We will collect 1000 survivors completing a set of self-report-questionnaires encompassing physical, psychological and social domains of quality of life. Participants are clustered in groups according to time since diagnosis and compared with each other. Furthermore, survivors will be compared with the general population. Factors predicting high quality of life will be identified via multiple regression analyses and structure equation modeling. DISCUSSION: Our study will help to inform health care providers about the specific long-term burden among survivors with hematological malignancies. Identification of factors predicting high quality of life will help to develop adequate intervention strategies to enhance well-being in hematological cancer survivors. Our methodological advantages including the large sample as well as the assessment of different domains of quality of life will ensure novel and robust results. A limitation of the study is the cross-sectional design.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Emotional Adjustment , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 22(1) of Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (see record 2016-25216-001). In the article, there were errors in the Participants subsection in the Method section. The last three sentences should read "Job tenure ranged from less than 1 year to 32 years, with an average of 8.83 years (SD 7.80). Participants interacted with clients on average 5.44 hr a day (SD 2.41). The mean working time was 7.36 hr per day (SD 1.91)."] Negative work events can diminish daily occupational well-being, yet the degree to which they do so depends on the way in which people deal with their emotions. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of acceptance in the link between daily negative work events and occupational well-being. We hypothesized that acceptance would be associated with better daily occupational well-being, operationalized as low end-of-day negative emotions and fatigue, and high work engagement. Furthermore, we predicted that acceptance would buffer the adverse impact of negative work events on daily well-being. A microlongitudinal study across 10 work days was carried out with 92 employees of the health care sector, yielding a total of 832 daily observations. As expected, acceptance was associated with lower end-of-day negative emotions and fatigue (though there was no association with work engagement) across the 10-day period. Furthermore, acceptance moderated the effect of negative event occurrence on daily well-being: Highly accepting employees experienced less increase in negative emotions and less reduction in work engagement (though comparable end-of-day fatigue) on days with negative work events, relative to days without negative work events, than did less accepting employees. These findings highlight affective, resource-saving, and motivational benefits of acceptance for daily occupational well-being and demonstrate that acceptance is associated with enhanced resilience to daily negative work events. (PsycINFO Database Record
Subject(s)
Emotions , Fatigue/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Work/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude , Female , Germany , Health Personnel , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Multilevel Analysis , Stress, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this prospective multicenter study, we investigated cancer-and-treatment-specific distress (CTXD) and its impact on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Patients were consulted before (T0, N = 239), 3 (T1, N = 150), and 12 months (T2, N = 102) after HSCT. Medical (eg, diagnosis and pretreatment) and demographic information, CTXD and PTSD (PCL-C) were assessed. RESULTS: Random intercept models revealed that the sum score of CTXD was highest pre-HSCT (T0), decreased by T1 (γ = -.18, 95% CI [-.26/-.09]), and by T2 (γ = -.10, 95% CI [-.20/-.00]). Uncertainty, family strain, and health burden were rated most distressing during HSCT. Uncertainty and family strain decreased from T0 to T1 (γ = -.30, 95% CI [-.42/-.17]; γ = -.10, 95% CI [-.20/-.00]) and health burden from T1 to T2 (γ = -.21, 95% CI [-.36/.05]). Women were more likely to report uncertainty (γ = .38, 95% CI [.19/.58]), family strain (γ = .38, 95% CI [.19/.58]), and concerns regarding appearance and sexuality (γ = .31, 95% CI [.14/.47]) than men. Uncertainty (γ = .18, 95% CI [.12/.24]), appearance and sexuality (γ = .09, 95% CI [.01/.16]), and health burden (γ = .21, 95% CI [.14/.27]) emerged as predictors of PTSD symptomatology across the 3 assessment points. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide first evidence regarding the course of 6 dimensions of CTXD during HSCT and their impact on PTSD symptomatology. Specifically, results emphasize the major burden of uncertainty pre-HSCT and the impact of uncertainty and concerns regarding appearance and sexuality on PTSD symptomatology.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Female , Germany , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite the life-threatening character of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allogeneic HSCT), very few longitudinal research exists on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology in this patient group. We investigated prevalence, temporal course and predictors of PTSD symptomatology in this population. METHODS: Patients were assessed before conditioning (T0), 100 days (T1), and 12 months after HSCT (T2). PTSD symptomatology was measured with the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. We conducted multilevel modeling and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine patients participated at baseline, 150 at T1, and 102 at T2. Up to 15 % met the criteria for PTSD at least once during the course of assessment. Fifty-two percent showed diagnostic relevant levels of intrusion, 30 % of avoidance, and 33 % of arousal at least once. Apart from arousal, which increased between T0 and T1 (γ = 0.56, p = 0.03), no other severity score significantly differed between time points. Being impaired by pain (γ = 2.89, p < 0.01), pain level (γ = 0.63, p = 0.02), and being female (γ = 3.81, p < 0.01) emerged as significant predictors of PTSD symptomatology when taking into account all time points. Acute plus chronic graft-versus-host-disease and longer hospital stay predicted PTSD symptomatology at T2 (γ = 3.39, p = 0.04; γ = 0.1, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT met the criteria for PTSD. PTSD symptomatology is prominent at all assessment points. Burden of pain, being female, and medical complications are risk factors for elevated levels of PTSD symptomatology. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Psychological support should be offered not only after treatment but also in the long-term and even before HSCT. Professionals should be aware of the psychological consequences accompanied by pain and complications.