ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Child , Prospective Studies , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Databases, Factual , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Extragonadal germ cell tumors (GCTs) are thought to arise as a result of local transformation of primordial gonadal cells (PGCs) that become misplaced during embryogenesis. With the exception of bilateral testis tumors, metachronous GCT (i.e., occurring at a site classically described for primary GCTs) are rare events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical, radiological, and molecular data (if available) of patients with metachronous GCT were analyzed. RESULTS: Three Caucasian males were identified: case 1 presented with a pineal germinoma 19 years after a mediastinal seminoma that had been treated with chemotherapy, case 2 presented with a pineal non-seminomatous GCT (NSGCT) that occurred three years after a mediastinal seminoma treated with chemotherapy, and case 3 presented with a mediastinal seminoma concomitant with a suprasellar germinoma that occurred two years after a stage I testicular NSGCT treated exclusively with surgery. None of these patients had a positive family history or disorder of sex development. Molecular data were available for cases 2 and 3. In case 2, a CHEK2 gene biallelic inactivation in the second tumor suggested chemoresistance to cisplatin. This was further confirmed by tumor progression during second-line treatment. In case 3, the molecular analysis revealed different profiles in the three tumors, thus suggesting distinct tumor cell origins. CONCLUSION: These rare cases should alert clinicians of the possibility of multiple GCTs that should not be considered to be relapses. The underlying physiopathology is unknown, but multiple PGC mismigrations is a likely cause. Initial treatment with cisplatin may select chemo-resistant clones, thereby making the subsequent treatment more of a challenge.
Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/therapy , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Checkpoint Kinase 2/genetics , Disease Management , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Neoplasms/genetics , Mediastinal Neoplasms/therapy , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/genetics , Neoplasms, Second Primary/genetics , Pinealoma/diagnostic imaging , Pinealoma/genetics , Pinealoma/therapy , Seminoma/diagnostic imaging , Seminoma/genetics , Seminoma/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Over the past two decades, aspirin has emerged as a promising chemoprotective agent to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). In 2016, the mounting evidence supporting its chemoprotective effect, from both basic science and clinical research, led the US Preventive Services Task Force to recommend regular use of low-dose aspirin in some subgroups of patients for whom the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks. In contrast, data on the chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers are less clear and remain controversial. Most data come from secondary analyses of cardiovascular prevention trials, with only a limited number reporting cancer outcomes as a prespecified endpoint, and overall unclear findings. Moreover, the potential chemoprotective effect of aspirin against other cancers has been recently questioned with the publication of 3 long-awaited trials of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases reporting no benefit of aspirin on overall cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality. Data on the chemoprotective effects of other antiplatelet agents remain scarce and inconclusive, and further research to examine their benefit are warranted. In this narrative review, we summarize current clinical evidence and continuing controversies on the potential chemoprotective properties of antiplatelet agents against cancer.