Which is a more appropriate recipient for posterior circulation bypass surgery: V3 or V2? Differences in underlying disease and lesion sites between extracranial vertebral artery dissection and atherosclerotic changes. Illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: Revascularization for extracranial vertebral artery dissection or vertebral artery atherosclerotic occlusive lesions caused by vertebrobasilar insufficiency or posterior circulation infarction is relatively rare. When bypassing the cervical external carotid artery (ECA) or common carotid artery (CCA) using a radial artery (RA) or saphenous vein (SV) graft, it is difficult to determine whether the recipient site should be the V2 or V3 portion. OBSERVATIONS: In case 1, cervical ECA-RA-V3 bypass was performed for bilateral extracranial vertebral artery dissection with the onset of ischemia, and cervical CCA-SV-V3 bypass was added 12 days later. Nine years after surgery, the bilateral vertebral artery dissection had improved, and the patient still had a patent bypass. In case 2, cervical ECA-RA-V2 bypass was performed for arteriosclerotic bilateral extracranial vertebral artery occlusion. The bypass was patent 5 years after surgery. The postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. LESSONS: The authors present cases of posterior fossa revascularization using the vertebral artery V3 and V2 portions via skull base surgery and note that it is important to consider each patient's individual characteristics when selecting the V3 or V2 portion.

Proposal of an integrated staging system using albumin-bilirubin grade and serum alpha-fetoprotein values for predicting postoperative prognosis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Because repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is a potentially invasive procedure, it is necessary to identify patients who truly benefit from repeat hepatectomy. Albumin-bilirubin grading has been reported to predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, as prognosis also depends on tumor factors, a staging system that adds tumor factors to albumin-bilirubin grading may lead to a more accurate prognostication in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Albumin-bilirubin grading and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were combined and the albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score was created ([albumin-bilirubin grading = 1; 1 point, 2 or 3; 2 points] + [alpha-fetoprotein<75 ng/mL, 0 points; ≥5, 1 point]). Patients were classified into three groups, and their characteristics and survival were evaluated. The predictive ability of the albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score was compared with that of the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program and the Japan Integrated Stage scores. RESULTS: Albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score significantly stratified postoperative survival (albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score = 1/2/3: 5-year recurrence-free survival [%]: 22.4/20.7/0.0, p < 0.001) and showed the highest predictive value for survival among the integrated systems (albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score/Japan Integrated Stage/Cancer of the Liver Italian Program: 0.785/0.708/0.750). CONCLUSIONS: Albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score is useful for predicting the survival of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing repeat hepatectomy.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Literature Review and Our Experience of NAC-GS.

In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes.

Comparative analysis of perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease versus viral hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the accumulating evidence regarding the oncological differences between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and viral infection-related HCC, the short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resection of NAFLD-related HCC remain unclear. While some reports indicate improved postoperative survival in NAFLD-related HCC, other studies suggest higher postoperative complications in these patients. METHODS: Patients with NAFLD and those with hepatitis viral infection who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at our department were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical, surgical, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 1047 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC, 57 had NAFLD-related HCC (NAFLD group), and 727 had virus-related HCC (VH group). The body mass index and serum glycated hemoglobin levels were significantly higher in the NAFLD group than in the VH group. There were no significant differences in operative time and bleeding amount. Moreover, the morbidity and the length of postoperative hospital stays were similar across both groups. The pathological results showed that the tumor size was significantly larger in the NAFLD group than in the VH group. No significant differences between the groups in overall or recurrence-free survival were found. In a subgroup analysis with matched tumor diameters, patients in the NAFLD group had a better prognosis after hepatectomy than those in the VH group. CONCLUSION: Surgical outcomes after hepatectomy were comparable between the groups. Subgroup analysis reveals early detection and surgical intervention in NAFLD-HCC may improve prognosis.