Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
2.
Trauma Case Rep ; 40: 100667, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811613

ABSTRACT

Cardiac injury accounts for less than 10 % of all traumas and it is a fatal condition associated with cardiac tamponade or massive haemothorax, which requires immediate intervention, such as resuscitative thoracotomy. However, in case of haemothorax without the findings suggestive of cardiac damage such as pericardial effusion, it is difficult to determine the complications of cardiac injury, because injury of the lung or intercostal arteries is usually considered first. We describe a rare case of left atrial appendage rupture with a right-sided massive haemothorax with slight cardiac effusion. A 47-year-old man with no significant medical history was transferred to our emergency department after crashing his motorcycle into a car. A right resuscitative thoracotomy for massive haemothorax was performed, followed by hilarious clamping and pericardial drainage. We found continuous bleeding from a right dorsal pericardial injury which indicated cardiac injury. Soon after the patient was referred to the operating room, left atrial appendage rupture was found, and ligated. The postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged on 15th postoperative day without complication. Left atrial appendage rupture is caused by a direct external force to the left atrium, so the pericardial injury is usually ipsilateral to the left side of the pericardium, resulting in perforation of the left thoracic cavity. Therefore, left atrial appendage rupture with a right-sided massive haemothorax is rare. In addition, when a cardiac injury is associated with a pericardial injury, most of the pericardial effusion drains into the thoracic cavity, resulting in a small amount of pericardial effusion, which make it difficult to recognize the cardiac injury. In conclusion, in blunt trauma, even in the case of a right-sided haemothorax, the possibility of cardiac injury in addition to pulmonary contusion should be considered and explored, because cardiac injury could be fatal.

3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(11)2021 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34764095

ABSTRACT

The optimal management of patients with appendiceal endometriosis has not been determined because of the difficulty of establishing a preoperative diagnosis. There are no reports of preoperative hormone therapy for a patient with appendiceal endometriosis. We report a patient who underwent resection of appendiceal endometriosis after hormone therapy. A 40-year-old woman with history of recurrent pelvic abscesses presented to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain. The recurrent pelvic abscesses were synchronised with her menstrual cycle. CT scan demonstrated a 25 mm contrast-enhanced luminal structure adjacent to the cecum, which was thought to be a mucocele of the appendix. Considering the recurrent symptoms during menstruation, endometriosis was suspected. Treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was started for appendiceal endometriosis, which alleviated the symptoms. After 3 months, elective laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Preoperative hormonal therapy is an option for patients with appendiceal endometriosis, especially when there is concern for dense adhesions.


Subject(s)
Appendix , Endometriosis , Mucocele , Abdominal Pain , Adult , Appendectomy , Appendix/diagnostic imaging , Appendix/surgery , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Female , Humans
4.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 13(8): 806-813, 2021 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34512904

ABSTRACT

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a rare cause of the "acute abdomen", characterized by impaired blood flow to the intestine. The principle of treatment is restoration of perfusion to ischemic bowel and resection of any necrotic intestine. Surgery and endovascular intervention are two complementary approaches to mesenteric ischemia. Endovascular intervention is not an alternative to the surgical approach, but it has the potential to improve the prognosis of patients with AMI when judiciously combined with a surgical approach. Due to the need for emergent treatment of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia, the treatment strategy needs to be modified for each facility. This review aims to highlight cutting-edge studies and provide reasonable treatment strategies for patients with acute mesenteric ischemia based on available evidence.

5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 41: 84-89, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33401081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In most surgical textbooks, it has been stated that pain almost always precedes vomiting in patients with appendicitis. However, the usefulness of this classic history item, "pain before vomiting", has been investigated in only one study nearly 50 years ago, in which the cause of abdominal pain could not be identified in more than 40% of patients. Accordingly, our objective was to evaluate the performance of pain before vomiting for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients who presented with both acute abdominal pain and vomiting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult outpatients with abdominal pain and vomiting at three acute care hospitals was performed. The reference standard for appendicitis was a CT scan evaluated by two radiologists. Diagnostic performance of pain before vomiting and the value it added to the Alvarado score were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 310 patients, 24 patients were diagnosed with appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of pain before vomiting was a sensitivity of 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.8-99.3) and a specificity of 16.6% (95% CI 12.6-21.4). When combined with the Alvarado score, it ruled out appendicitis in an additional 12% (increased from 32% to 44%) of patients without any false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: "Pain before vomiting" is useful for ruling out appendicitis in patients with abdominal pain and vomiting.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/etiology , Acute Pain/etiology , Appendicitis/complications , Vomiting/etiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
Case Rep Emerg Med ; 2020: 8863885, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33178466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over several decades, standard management of blunt spleen injury (BSI) has been changed from operative intervention to the selective operative and nonoperative management (NOM). However, some patient needs laparotomy first. This article describes a case of a BSI patient who failed nonoperative management after angioembolization (AE). Case Presentation. A 58-year-old man fell from his motorcycle and was brought to our hospital. His vital sign was stable after extracellular fluid bolus. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed AAST grade V spleen injury. AE was performed for the splenic artery, but his systolic blood pressure suddenly dropped under 60 mmHg. The resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was inserted, and immediate laparotomy was performed. A pancreatic tail injury was detected, and the splenic artery and vein were burst at the pancreatic tail and controlled by hemostatic suture. After splenectomy, a drain was placed at the pancreatic tail and the abdomen was temporally closed. The postoperative course was not remarkable except for abdominal abscess treated with antibiotics, and he was discharged on foot. CONCLUSION: Although NOM is becoming one of the choices for severe BSI, there will still be a patient who requires surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the mechanism of injury and the limitation of AE as an adjunct to NOM. Patient selection for initial NOM and timing to convert to laparotomy are important.

7.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 72: 599-602, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698297

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There are several reports of colon perforation in patients with acute pancreatitis, but the mechanism is not understood. We describe a patient with acute pancreatitis followed by retroperitoneal perforation of the descending colon and a duodenal fistula. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old male presented with acute pancreatitis. He was hemodynamically unstable, had respiratory failure on admission and was treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). He recovered and left the ICU on day 13. Although his general condition improved, a computed tomography (CT) scan showed air and fluid in the left retroperitoneum. Gastrografin enema and CT scan showed extraluminal leakage in the descending colon and retroperitoneal drainage was performed on day 27. After drainage, there was continuous voluminous feculent discharge, and a loop ileostomy was performed on day 34. A repeat CT scan revealed ascites. A percutaneous catheter injected with contrast showed a duodenal fistula. After drainage, the fever resolved and the patient was discharged on hospital day 106. DISCUSSION: Although there is no clear mechanism of colonic perforation in patients with acute pancreatitis, one hypothesis is that ischemia secondary to inflammation caused by pancreatitis plays a role. The involved area is usually in the watershed areas of the colon. Retroperitoneal drainage of the colon perforation may have necessitated creation of a diverting loop ileostomy. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal colon perforation must be considered in patients with acute pancreatitis.

8.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 61: 26-29, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310857

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We report a patient for whom a colonic stent was successfully used to treat colonic stenosis secondary to acute pancreatitis. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 70-year-old male presented with epigastric pain. A choledocholith and bile duct dilatation were found on abdominal computed tomography scan. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed and a common bile duct stent was placed. Ten hours after stent placement, severe epigastric pain developed. Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed increased density of fat tissue around the pancreas. He was diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis and treated in the intensive care unit. On the twenty-eighth hospital day, he vomited. His abdomen was distended and tender to palpation. Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed stenosis of the descending colon and proximally dilated colon and small bowel. He was diagnosed with colonic stenosis secondary to acute pancreatitis. A colonic stent was placed in the descending colon. Eight months after this episode, elective subtotal colectomy was performed. The postoperative course was unremarkable. DISCUSSION: The overall documented leak rate for segmental colectomy with or without on-table lavage following large bowel obstruction is about 4%. In addition, in the acute phase of severe acute pancreatitis, inflammation makes surgery difficult. Use of enteric stents in patients with pancreatitis could be used as a temporizing measure until the inflammation and obstruction improve. CONCLUSION: Colonic stenting is useful as a bridge to surgery in the management of large bowel obstruction.

9.
Surg Case Rep ; 5(1): 94, 2019 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31183595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paraesophageal hernias are usually asymptomatic; however, they can cause serious complications such as necrosis or incarceration-induced perforation. Necrosis usually occurs in the incarcerated portion of the hernia. Here, we report the case of a patient with gastric necrosis secondary to an incarcerated paraesophageal hernia in which the necrotic lesion was outside the hernia sac. CASE PRESENTATION: A 91-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain and vomiting. A physical examination showed hypotension and a diffusely tender and rigid abdomen. Computed tomography showed a paraesophageal hernia, massive ascites, and free air around the stomach. A laparotomy was performed to treat the upper gastrointestinal perforation. The stomach was incarcerated within the paraesophageal hernia sac. After reducing the stomach, we identified a large perforation on the posterior wall of the gastric fundus. Full-thickness necrosis involving part of the stomach necessitated total gastrectomy. She remained physiologically unstable and her condition deteriorated; she died 2 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A hiatal hernia can be associated with an ischemic gastric perforation outside the hernia sac.

10.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(5)2019 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129642

ABSTRACT

Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) is a life-threatening condition that requires emergent intervention and anorexia nervosa is a chronic eating disorder that requires careful medical and nutritional management. A 54-year-old woman with a history of anorexia nervosa and undergoing chronic haemodialysis developed abdominal pain and called an ambulance. On arrival, she was in shock and abdominal examination was consistent with diffuse peritonitis. Computed tomography scan suggested ischaemia from the distal ileum to the ascending colon. Emergency laparotomy revealed NOMI from the distal ileum to the transverse colon. The treatment strategy included staged operations and careful medical management to optimise nutritional support and electrolyte management with survival of the patient. NOMI and anorexia nervosa are both difficult to manage. Meticulous interdisciplinary management can result in a good outcome.


Subject(s)
Colon/surgery , Ileum/surgery , Mesenteric Ischemia/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Anorexia Nervosa/complications , Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Colon/pathology , Female , Humans , Ileum/pathology , Mesenteric Ischemia/complications , Mesenteric Ischemia/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Nutritional Support
11.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 57: 145-151, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30959363

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sciatic hernias are the least common type of pelvic floor hernias. The purpose of this study was to present a novel technique for manual reduction and to conduct a systematic review of previous reports of sciatic hernias to characterize them and review the outcomes. PRESENTATION OF CASE: An 86-year-old female presented with left-sided lumbar pain. She had a past medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and was treated with prednisolone and methotrexate. Her left abdomen and left lumbar area were tender. An unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed invagination of the left ureter into the left sciatic foramen and a dilated left proximal ureter and renal pelvis. Ultrasonography showed an invaginated left ureter viewing from the left buttock. She was diagnosed with a sciatic hernia. Ultrasound-guided manual transvaginal reduction was performed. Post-procedure unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan confirmed reduction of the ureter. After 10-months of follow-up, there is no evidence of recurrence. DISCUSSION: Previous reports of patients with sciatic hernia were identified. Clinical data associated with the hernia, reduction technique and clinical outcomes were collected for 72 patients. Open reduction was performed in 24 patients. A ureteral stent was placed in eight patients when the hernia contained the ureter. Four postoperative complications including one death were reported in adults. There were no reports of closed manual reduction. CONCLUSION: A sciatic hernia in women may be manually reduced without surgery. Further reviews of this rare entity are needed to determine the best management strategy.

12.
Surg Case Rep ; 4(1): 47, 2018 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are few reports of metastases from colon cancer to an inguinal hernia sac, and few reports of colon cancer originating in diverticula. We report a patient with carcinoma of the sigmoid colon arising in two diverticula, who presented with peritoneal seeding to an inguinal hernia sac, and a review of the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old male underwent open herniorrhaphy for a left inguinal hernia. At operation, a nodule in the inguinal hernia sac was resected and histologic examination revealed adenocarcinoma, which was suspected to be a metastasis from a distant primary lesion. Postoperative evaluation included colonoscopy and positron emission tomography which showed two suspected lesions in sigmoid diverticula. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy was performed, and pathology revealed adenocarcinoma in two sigmoid diverticula. CONCLUSIONS: If a nodule is found in an inguinal hernia sac, especially in older patients, peritoneal metastases should be considered. Resection of the nodule with histopathologic evaluation is essential. Colon cancer arising in a diverticulum should be considered as a possible site of the primary lesion.

13.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 46: 38-40, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679809

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Colonic ischemia is challenging to diagnose preoperatively. We present a patient with colonic ischemia, initially considered to have colonic obstruction. We review the history, physical findings, imaging, operative documents and postoperative diagnosis of this patient with an atypical presentation of colonic ischemia. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 74-year old female presented with dyspnea on exertion and melena. A tumor in the sigmoid colon was identified by colonoscopy and biopsy showed adenocarcinoma. After admission, she developed abdominal pain. Computed tomography scan revealed the mass in the sigmoid colon and dilation of the proximal colon. She was diagnosed with colonic obstruction due to the sigmoid cancer and emergent transverse loop colostomy was performed. Postoperatively she developed hypotension and the colostomy appeared ischemic. Emergent reoperation showed ischemia from the ileum to the sigmoid colon. Despite resection, the patient died postoperatively of multiple organ system failure. DISCUSSION: The resulting delay in diagnosis of colonic ischemia likely contributed to the poor outcome. Imaging studies play a key role in the management of acute abdominal emergencies. However, imaging can be misleading because it is only a "radiological diagnosis". A radiological diagnosis makes sense when it is the same as the "clinical diagnosis". An emphasis must be placed on history taking and physical examinations. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to diagnose colonic ischemia in patients with suspected colonic obstruction due to colon cancer. The imaging studies in these patients may be misleading, resulting in adverse outcomes.

15.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 38: 69-72, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28738239

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pancreas transplantation is the best treatment option in selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Here we report a patient with a nonmarginal duodenal perforation five years after a simultaneous pancreas-living donor kidney transplantation (SPLKT). PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 31-year old male who underwent SPLKT five years previously presented with severe abdominal pain. He had a marginal duodenal perforation four years later, treated by primary closure and drainage. Biopsy of the pancreas and duodenum graft at that time showed chronic rejection in the pancreas and acute inflammation with an ulcer in the duodenum. At presentation, computerized tomography scan showed mesenteric pneumatosis with enteric leak and ileal dilatation proximal to the anastomotic site. We performed emergent laparotomy and found a 1.0cm perforation at the nonmarginal, posterior wall of the duodenum. Undigested fiber-rich food was extracted from the site and an omental patch placed over the perforation. An ileostomy was created proximal to the omega loop for decompression and a drain placed nearby. The postoperative course was unremarkable. DISCUSSION: There are only eight previous cases of graft duodenal perforation in the literature. Fiber-rich food residue passing through the anastomosis with impaction may have led to this perforation. CONCLUSION: When a patient is stable, even in the presence of delayed duodenal graft perforation, graft excision may not be necessary. Intraoperative exploration should include Doppler ultrasound examination of the vasculature to rule out thrombosis as a contributor to ischemia. Tissue biopsy should be performed to diagnose rejection.

16.
Case Rep Surg ; 2017: 2062157, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28255493

ABSTRACT

Background. Anal stenosis is a rare but serious complication of anorectal surgery. Severe anal stenosis is a challenging condition. Case Presentation. A 70-year-old Japanese man presented with a ten-hour history of continuous anal pain due to incarcerated hemorrhoids. He had a history of reducible internal hemorrhoids and was followed for 10 years. He had a fever and nonreducible internal hemorrhoids surrounding necrotic soft tissues. He was diagnosed as Fournier's gangrene and treated with debridement and diverting colostomy. He needed temporary continuous renal replacement therapy and was discharged on postoperative day 39. After four months, severe anal stenosis was found on physical examination, and total colonoscopy showed a complete anal stricture. The patient was brought to the operating room and underwent colostomy closure and anoplasty. He recovered without any complications. Conclusion. We present a first patient with a complete anal stricture after diverting colostomy treated with anoplasty and stoma closure. This case reminds us of the assessment of distal bowel conduit and might suggest that anoplasty might be considered in the success of the colostomy closure.

18.
BMC Med Educ ; 17(1): 57, 2017 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is increasingly used for postgraduate medical admissions and in undergraduate settings. MMIs use mostly Situational Questions (SQs) rather than Past-Behavioural Questions (PBQs). A previous study of MMIs in this setting, where PBQs and SQs were asked in the same order, reported that the reliability of PBQs was non-inferior to SQs and that SQs were more acceptable to candidates. The order in which the questions are asked may affect reliability and acceptability of an MMI. This study investigated the reliability of an MMI using both PBQs and SQs, minimising question order bias. Acceptability of PBQs and SQs was also assessed. METHODS: Forty candidates applying for a postgraduate medical admission for 2016-2017 were included; 24 examiners were used. The MMI consisted of six stations with one examiner per station; a PBQ and a SQ were asked at every station, and the order of questions was alternated between stations. Reliability was analysed for scores obtained for PBQs or SQs separately, and for both questions. A post-MMI survey was used to assess the acceptability of PBQs and SQs. RESULTS: The generalisability (G) coefficients for PBQs only, SQs only, and both questions were 0.87, 0.96, and 0.80, respectively. Decision studies suggested that a four-station MMI would also be sufficiently reliable (G-coefficients 0.82 and 0.94 for PBQs and SQs, respectively). In total, 83% of participants were satisfied with the MMI. In terms of face validity, PBQs were more acceptable than SQs for candidates (p = 0.01), but equally acceptable for examiners (88% vs. 83% positive responses for PBQs vs. SQs; p = 0.377). Candidates preferred PBQs to SQs when asked to choose one, though this difference was not significant (p = 0.081); examiners showed a clear preference for PBQs (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Reliability and acceptability of six-station MMI were good among 40 postgraduate candidates; modelling suggested that four stations would also be reliable. SQs were more reliable than PBQs. Candidates found PBQs more acceptable than SQs and examiners preferred PBQs when they had to choose between the two. Our findings suggest that it is better to ask both PBQs and SQs during an MMI to maximise acceptability.


Subject(s)
Interviews as Topic/standards , School Admission Criteria , Students, Medical , Adult , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Personnel Selection , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Students, Medical/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
19.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 28: 214-218, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27721201

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Omental hemorrhage results from rupture of the omental vessels. There are many causes of omental hemorrhage including trauma, aneurysm, and vasculitis. Idiopathic omental hemorrhage is a rare cause of an acute abdomen, which is potentially life-threatening. We report a patient with idiopathic omental hemorrhage, which may have been caused by overeating. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old man without a history of trauma, bleeding disorders, or other significant medical history, presented with left upper quadrant pain, which began after overeating the previous evening. The pain worsened and he presented to the emergency department. On physical examination, his BP was 111/69mmHg and pulse 71 and he reported tenderness and involuntary guarding in the left upper quadrant on palpation. Contrast enhanced computed tomography scan revealed intraperitoneal fluid collection with intra-omental extravasation. Significant intraperitoneal hemorrhage was suspected and emergency laparotomy was performed. On exploring the abdominal cavity, a hematoma was found in the greater omentum, adjacent to the right gastroepiploic artery. No active bleeding was seen, and partial omentectomy was performed. There were no obvious lesions suggestive of malignancy or aneurysm, supporting the diagnosis of idiopathic omental hemorrhage. On postoperative day six, the patient developed a wound dehiscence, which was surgically closed. The subsequent postoperative course was uneventful and he was discharged on fifth day after the second operation. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic omental hemorrhage is a rare cause of an acute abdomen, which may develop after eating. Omentectomy is preferred to ligation or transcatheter arterial embolization to rule out an underlying malignancy or aneurysm.

20.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 8(9): 651-655, 2016 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27721929

ABSTRACT

AIM: To review clinical experience with barium appendicitis at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis, from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 was performed. Age, gender, computed tomography (CT) scan findings if available, past history of barium studies, pathology, and the presence of perforation or the development of complications were reviewed. If the CT scan revealed high density material in the appendix, the maximum CT scan radiodensity of the material is measured in Hounsfield units (HU). Barium appendicitis is defined as: (1) patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis; (2) the patient has a history of a prior barium study; and (3) the CT scan shows high density material in the appendix. Patients who meet all three criteria are considered to have barium appendicitis. RESULTS: In total, 396 patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the study period. Of these, 12 patients (3.0%) met the definition of barium appendicitis. Of these 12 patients, the median CT scan radiodensity of material in the appendix was 10000.8 HU, ranging from 3066 to 23423 HU (± 6288.2). In contrast, the median CT scan radiodensity of fecaliths in the appendix, excluding patients with barium appendicitis, was 393.1 HU, ranging from 98 to 2151 HU (± 382.0). The CT scan radiodensity of material in the appendices of patients with barium appendicitis was significantly higher than in patients with nonbarium fecaliths (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Barium appendicitis is not rare in Japan. Measurement of the CT scan radiodensity of material in the appendix may differentiate barium appendicitis from routine appendicitis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...