Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 19(8): 571-576, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200611

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Parenteral nutrition (PN) has been shown to be a safe method of feeding in the intensive care unit with modern infection prevention practices, but similar analysis in the hematology-oncology setting is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1,617 patients with hematologic malignancies admitted and discharged from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania during 3,629 encounters from 2017 to 2019 was undertaken to evaluate the association of PN administration with risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Proportions of mucosal barrier injury (MBI)-CLABSI and non-MBI-CLABSI were also compared between groups. RESULTS: Risk of CLABSI was associated with cancer type and duration of neutropenia but not with PN administration (odds ratio, 1.015; 95% CI, 0.986 to 1.045; P = .305) in a multivariable analysis. MBI-CLABSI comprised 73% of CLABSI in patients exposed to and 70% in patients not exposed to PN, and there was no significant difference between groups (χ2 = 0.06, P = .800). CONCLUSION: PN was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI in a sample of patients with hematologic malignancy with central venous catheters when adjusting for cancer type, duration of neutropenia, and catheter days. The high proportion of MBI-CLABSI highlights the effect of gut permeability within this population.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Neutropenia , Sepsis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Neutropenia/etiology , Parenteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Sepsis/etiology
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(2): 997-1003, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556621

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Poor nutrition status in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. We aim to determine whether a malnutrition-driven nutritional support protocol can improve these outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed adults for malnutrition who were consecutively admitted for ASCT between October 2017 and March 2019 (n = 251), and provided enteral or parenteral nutrition (EN/PN) to patients who were malnourished early in the transplantation admission. We compared their clinical outcomes with those of a historical cohort admitted between May 2016 and October 2017 (n = 257) for whom nutrition assessment and initiation of EN/PN were not protocol-driven. RESULTS: Patients receiving ASCT during the intervention period experienced decreased odds of prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.023), central line-associated bloodstream infection (p = 0.015), mucosal barrier injury (p = 0.037), and high weight loss (p = 0.002), in a multivariate analysis as compared with those receiving ASCT during the control period. Outcomes for ICU transfer, deconditioning on discharge, time to platelet engraftment, and unplanned 30-day hospital readmission did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: A malnutrition-driven nutritional support protocol may improve outcomes for ASCT patients.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Malnutrition/therapy , Nutritional Support/methods , Parenteral Nutrition/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects , Aged , Cohort Studies , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/etiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Autologous/methods
3.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 19(7): e393-e398, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053549

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) patients are at risk for malnutrition before transplantation admission as well as malnutrition acquired during their transplantation admission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study we examined data related to consecutive adults (n = 330) admitted for ASCT between 2014 and 2016 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Malnutrition risk on admission (identified by the Malnutrition Screening Tool) and transplantation-associated weight loss were analyzed for independent associations with hospital length of stay, nosocomial infection, intensive care unit transfer, deconditioning, time to platelet and neutrophil engraftment, 30-day readmission, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Adults with high malnutrition risk (n = 60) had a longer median hospital stay (P = .004), longer median time to platelet engraftment (P = .022), increased nosocomial infections (P = .047), and increased 1-year mortality (P = .036). Adults with high transplantation-associated weight loss (n = 100) experienced longer hospital stays (P < .001) and more intensive care unit transfers (P = .001). Outcomes for deconditioning, time to neutrophil engraftment, and 30-day readmission did not differ significantly on the basis of nutrition risk or weight loss. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to determine whether early nutrition intervention would improve these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Nutritional Status , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/etiology , Nutrition Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 9(2): 189-200, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30588353

ABSTRACT

Inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are important treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations. Erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib are approved for use in NSCLC patients, and several other agents are in clinical development. The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacokinetic and known drug interaction data for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) available for use in NSCLC patients, as well as adverse events (AEs) commonly observed with EGFR-TKI treatment, and to discuss relevant management strategies. The importance of this information for patient care is explored from the perspective of advanced practitioners. Pharmacokinetic, drug-interaction, and safety data are included for EGFR inhibitors approved for NSCLC (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib). Relevant dose modifications and AE management strategies are also reviewed. The interdisciplinary health-care team plays an essential role in patient education, care planning, and medication administration. As such, it is essential that advanced practitioners understand the safety profiles and the potential for drug interactions with EGFR TKIs to ensure patients achieve the maximum benefit from these agents.

5.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(9): 1692-8, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028503

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a complex medical procedure for some patients with hematologic malignancies. Most ASCTs occur at academic centers where either medical residents (house staff [HS]) or advanced practice providers (APPs) provide daily care. As a result of increasing work-hour regulations, APPs have assumed greater responsibilities, including those traditionally held by HS. In this study we evaluate ASCT patient outcomes by inpatient provider service. A retrospective, single-center chart review of ASCT patients was performed. ASCT patients admitted to an HS service from May 2011 to May 2012 (N = 86) were compared with ASCT patients admitted to a newly formed APP service from October 2012 to October 2013 (N = 81). As part of a secondary sensitivity analysis, we compared ASCT patients on the APP service to a subset of ASCT patients admitted to the HS service also from October 2012 to October 2013 (n = 27). Our primary outcomes were 100-day survival and relapse-free survival rates. Additional outcomes included length of stay (LOS), inpatient complications, and ordering behavior. Our primary pre- and post-analyses found no differences in 100-day overall survival and 100-day relapse-free survival rate between the services. The rate of pneumonia was lower on the APP service (15% versus 28%, P = .04), with no significant differences in other infectious complications. HS ordered more blood cultures (6.7 versus 4.2, P = .03) per patient than the APP service. There was no difference in LOS, readmission rates, or inpatient mortality. With regards to our secondary sensitivity analysis, no differences were found in 100-day overall survival and 100-day relapse-free survival rates between the services. There was a decreased LOS on the APP service (29.4 versus 37.2 days, P = .01). HS ordered more blood cultures (9.3 versus 4.2, P < .01) and more radiological films (8.1 versus 5.2, P = .05) per patient than the APP service. This increased ordering and LOS was associated with an increase in mean hospital charges on the HS service (P = .04). ASCT patients on an APP service had similar 100-day outcomes as those on the HS service. In the setting of limited resources, APPs are potential alternative providers for complex transplant inpatients.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Health Personnel , Hematologic Neoplasms , Length of Stay , Stem Cell Transplantation , Aged , Allografts , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...