Transrectal osteopathic manipulation treatment for chronic coccydynia: feasibility, acceptability and patient-oriented outcomes in a quality improvement project.

CONTEXT: Pain of the coccyx, coccydynia, is a common condition with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Although most cases resolve with conservative care, 10 % become chronic and are more debilitating. Treatment for chronic coccydynia is limited; surgery is not definitive. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is the application of manually guided forces to areas of somatic dysfunction to improve physiologic function and support homeostasis including for coccydynia, but its use as a transrectal procedure for coccydynia in a primary care clinic setting is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to conduct a quality improvement (QI) study to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effects of transrectal OMT for chronic coccydynia in a primary care setting. METHODS: This QI project prospectively treated and assessed 16 patients with chronic coccydynia in a primary care outpatient clinic. The intervention was transrectal OMT as typically practiced in our clinic, and included myofascial release and balanced ligamentous tension in combination with active patient movement of the head and neck. The outcome measures included: acceptance, as assessed by the response rate (yes/no) to utilize OMT for coccydynia; acceptability, as assessed by satisfaction with treatment; and coccygeal pain, as assessed by self-report on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) for coccydynia while lying down, seated, standing, and walking. RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive patients with coccydynia were offered and accepted OMT; six patients also received other procedural care. Ten patients (two males, eight females) received only OMT intervention for their coccydynia and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Posttreatment scores immediately after one procedure (acute model) and in follow-up were significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores. Follow-up pain scores provided by five of the 10 patients demonstrated significant improvement. The study supports transrectal OMT as a feasible and acceptable treatment option for coccydynia. Patients were satisfied with the procedure and reported improvement. There were no side effects or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the use of transrectal OMT for chronic coccydynia is feasible and acceptable; self-reported improvement suggests utility in this clinic setting. Further evaluation in controlled studies is warranted.

Outpatient Osteopathic Single Organ System Musculoskeletal Exam Form series: validation of the Outpatient Osteopathic SOS Musculoskeletal Exam Form, a new standardized medical record.

The authors validate the Outpatient Osteopathic SOS (Single Organ System) Musculoskeletal Exam Form (SOS MSEF), a 1-page form contained within the 4-page Outpatient Osteopathic Single Organ System Musculoskeletal Exam Form Series (SOS-FS). Handwritten physician progress notes (PPNs) in the medical record (considered to be the "gold standard" for clinical records) were compared with information placed on the SOS MSEF for the same patient encounter. Data recorded by 14 trained and certified investigators on the standardized SOS MSEF-which was designed for use with the previously validated Outpatient Osteopathic SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) Note Form (SNF)-was compared with data recorded by the same investigators in PPNs. The authors compared the accuracy and efficiency of physicians recording musculoskeletal information in these two formats for 165 patient encounters. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to compare data recorded after patient encounters. Ninety-seven variables input from the PPNs or SOS MSEFs were significantly different at the P < or = .05 level, whereas 38 variables were not. Insufficient data was recorded for a determination of significance in 3 variables. For 121 variables, more data were recorded using the SOS MSEFs than PPNs; for 84 variables, the amount of data recorded exceeded twice that recorded using PPNs. For 10 variables, more data were recorded in PPNs; however, these differences were not significant. The authors conclude that the SOS MSEF is superior to PPNs for recording patient-encounter data in the osteopathic care setting. Moreover, they argue that the use of the validated SOS MSEF nationwide would ensure that osteopathic physicians would be recording data in a similar manner for uniform insurance claim coding, easy tracking of physicians-in-training and patient outcomes, and data collection for future research.

Outpatient osteopathic single organ system musculoskeletal exam form: training and certification.

The Outpatient Osteopathic Single Organ System Musculoskeletal Exam Form (SOS form) is a standardized examination data form. A standardized form is necessary to ensure that essential quality data are collected during osteopathic studies and that each submitted form is completed adequately and uniformly. Use of the standardized form permits reliable statistical computations from the collected data. The training process for the SOS form incorporated the following elements: (1) training investigators to use the form; (2) having trainees transcribe three clinical case examples onto SOS forms; (3) comparing each transcribed clinical case to a prepared key; (4) evaluating the trainees' work for accuracy; and (5) statistically evaluating the trainees' records for intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability. The success or failure of trainees to receive certification in their training process involved evaluating their ability to accurately and appropriately record data collected from three case examples. These cases were designed to evaluate recording accuracy and intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability. All trainees scored 80% or better for accuracy, and their work had good intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability. As a result, all trainees were awarded a numbered certificate for successful completion of the training process. Having a pool of well-trained, certified investigators available and ready to participate in the gathering of data through the use of the SOS form ensures that necessary data are collected and that the resulting databases are unified. It will also facilitate comparisons and statistical analysis of osteopathic research projects. Standardized forms and certified investigators will improve the quality of osteopathic research throughout the profession.