ABSTRACT
Background: Biologics are the important drugs for severe asthma, but clinical trials included few elderly patients. Data on the safety and efficacy of benralizumab in elderly asthma patients are limited. Methods: This clinical study was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study at two hospitals. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with severe asthma treated with benralizumab were included. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years or older. Efficacy and safety were then analyzed in elderly and non-elderly patients. The primary endpoints were the annual number of asthma exacerbations for efficacy and the discontinuation rate due to adverse events for safety. Results: Between August 2016 and October 2022, 61 patients were enrolled; 10 patients were excluded, and 51 (22 elderly, 29 non-elderly) patients were analyzed. In elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbations before treatment with benralizumab (pre-benralizumab) was 3.78, and the number during treatment with benralizumab was 1.26, a decrease of 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.74, p < 0.001). In non-elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbation in the pre-benralizumab period was 3.24, and during treatment with benralizumab it was 0.68, a decrease of 2.56 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.82, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (elderly vs non-elderly, 2 (9%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.18). Conclusion: Benralizumab reduced the annual number of asthma exacerbations and was well tolerated in elderly patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combination therapies including a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy or a PD-1 inhibitor, CTLA-4 inhibitor, and chemotherapy are standard first-line options. However, data directly comparing these regimens are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (CP) against nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy (CNI) in a real-world setting. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CP and CNI as first-line therapies in 182 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the response rate (RR) and safety profiles. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized for data analysis, adjusting for confounding factors such as age, gender, and PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: In this study, 160 patients received CP, while 22 received CNI. The CP group was associated with significantly better PFS than the CNI group (median 11.7 vs. 6.6 months, HR 0.56, p = 0.03). This PFS advantage persisted after propensity score matching to adjust for imbalances. No significant OS differences were observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred comparably, but immune-related adverse events were numerically more frequent in the CNI group. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, CP demonstrated superior PFS compared with CNI. These findings can inform treatment selection in advanced NSCLC.