CD4+ T cells with latent HIV-1 have reduced proliferative responses to T cell receptor stimulation.

The latent reservoir for HIV-1 in resting CD4+ T cells persists despite antiretroviral therapy as a barrier to cure. The antigen-driven proliferation of infected cells is a major mechanism of reservoir persistence. However, activation through the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) can induce latent proviruses, leading to viral cytopathic effects and immune clearance. In single-cell studies, we show that, relative to uninfected cells or cells with a defective provirus, CD4+ T cells with an intact provirus have a profound proliferative defect in response to TCR stimulation. Virion production was observed in only 16.5% of cultures with an intact provirus, but proliferation was reduced even when no virion production was detected. Proliferation was inversely correlated with in vivo clone size. These results may reflect the effects of previous in vivo proliferation and do not support attempts to reduce the reservoir with antiproliferative agents, which may have greater effects on normal T cell responses.

Measuring the latent reservoir for HIV-1: Quantification bias in near full-length genome sequencing methods.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectively inhibits HIV-1 replication but is not curative due to the persistence of a latent viral reservoir in resting CD4+ T cells. This reservoir is a major barrier to cure. Sequencing studies have revealed that the population of proviruses persisting in ART-treated individuals is dominated by defective proviruses that cannot give rise to viral rebound due to fatal defects including large deletions and APOBEC3-mediated hypermutation. Near full genome sequencing (nFGS) of individual proviruses is used in reservoir assays to provide an estimate of the fraction of proviruses that are intact. nFGS methods rely on a long-distance outer PCR capturing most (~9 kb) of the genome, followed by nested inner PCRs. The outer PCR is carried out at limit dilution, and interpretation of the results is based on the assumption that all proviruses are quantitatively captured. Here, we evaluate nFGS methods using the intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA), a multiplex digital droplet PCR assay that quantitates intact and defective proviruses with single molecule sensitivity using only short, highly efficient amplicons. We analyzed proviral templates of known sequence to avoid the additional complication of sequence polymorphism. With the IPDA, we quantitated molecular yields at each step of nFGS methods. We demonstrate that nFGS methods are inefficient and miss ~70% of full-length proviruses due to amplification failure at the initial outer PCR step. In contrast, proviruses with large internal deletions encompassing 70% of the genome can be quantitatively amplified under the same conditions. Accurate measurement of the latent reservoir of HIV-1 is essential for evaluating the efficacy of cure strategies, and the bias against full length proviruses in nFGS methods must be considered.

A quantitative approach for measuring the reservoir of latent HIV-1 proviruses.

A stable latent reservoir for HIV-1 in resting CD4+ T cells is the principal barrier to a cure1-3. Curative strategies that target the reservoir are being tested4,5 and require accurate, scalable reservoir assays. The reservoir was defined with quantitative viral outgrowth assays for cells that release infectious virus after one round of T cell activation1. However, these quantitative outgrowth assays and newer assays for cells that produce viral RNA after activation6 may underestimate the reservoir size because one round of activation does not induce all proviruses7. Many studies rely on simple assays based on polymerase chain reaction to detect proviral DNA regardless of transcriptional status, but the clinical relevance of these assays is unclear, as the vast majority of proviruses are defective7-9. Here we describe a more accurate method of measuring the HIV-1 reservoir that separately quantifies intact and defective proviruses. We show that the dynamics of cells that carry intact and defective proviruses are different in vitro and in vivo. These findings have implications for targeting the intact proviruses that are a barrier to curing HIV infection.