ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of bariatric surgery on diabetes and obesity have been widely demonstrated in the literature. The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of failure of laparoscopic gastric bypass both in terms of weight loss and metabolic remission after one follow-up year. METHODS: A longitudinal, multicenter prospective study was carried out on 771 patients affected by pathological obesity. The following parameters were recorded for each patient before surgery: anthropometric, metabolic, social, smoking habits and previous failure of other bariatric procedures. After 1 follow-up year, final weight, final Body Mass Index (BMI), final percentage of lost excess body weight and percentage of lost BMI were evaluated. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed a correlation between BMI>50 kg/m2, presence of metabolic syndrome, presence of diabetes, gastric pouch volume greater than 60 mL and failure of weight loss outcome. Statistical analysis of metabolic failure has recognized a high preoperative glycated hemoglobin percentage (HbA1c%) value as a statistically significant negative predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric Surgery is the most effective treatment for weight loss and metabolic improvement. However, in our study, surgery did not achieve the expected outcome in patients with specific metabolic, anthropometric and surgical characteristics (BMI>50 kg/m2, presence of metabolic syndrome, presence of T2DM with high preoperative HbA1c% level and gastric pouch volume greater than 60 mL).
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Gastric Bypass , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/urine , Body Mass Index , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/urine , Dyslipidemias/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Bypass/methods , Glycated Hemoglobin/urine , Humans , Italy , Laparoscopy/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/surgery , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The clinical and research debate on the peripheral intravascular (PIV) catheter length of stay in situ is ongoing. The principal aim of this study was to explore the factors behind a nurse's decision to leave a PIV in place for more than 96 hours. The study focused on 7 northern Italian hospitals in 2009. A consequent sample of 269 PIV catheters was included. Direct observation and interviews were adopted. The time of the expected PIV replacement was fixed at 96 hours after its positioning, in accordance with the international guideline. Several factors were taken into account in regard to replacement of the PIV catheters by nurses, ranging from analysis based on their own clinical experience with PIV complications and analysis of the patient's clinical situation to the critical analysis of their own work situation. This clinical decision-making process is valuable: leaving the PIV in place for more than 96 hours is a complex decision and not simply a guideline violation.