Proton pump inhibitors and risk of bloodstream infection without an identifiable source: a hospital-based case-control study.

The association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and systemic infections caused by bacterial translocation is unclear. This study aims to investigate whether patients receiving PPI therapy have a higher risk for bloodstream infections (BSI) without an identifiable source of infection, as an alternative indicator of BSI secondary to bacterial translocation. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study which enrolled all patients aged 20 years and older who developed BSI confirmed by two sets of positive blood culture and had inpatient care in Ichinomiya-Nishi Hospital in 2019. Patients' data were collected from medical records, and bacterial translocation type (BT-type) BSI group were defined as those who had BSI without an identifiable source of infection, whereas the others were classified control group based on the diagnostic criteria for each infectious disease. We analyzed data from 309 patients, including 66 cases and 243 controls. PPI users had a 2.4-fold higher risk of developing BT-type BSI compared to non-PPI-users after controlling for potential confounders (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.29-4.51, p=0.006). In conclusion, PPI use is associated with higher risk of BSI without an identifiable source and therefore, PPI use may increase the risk of septic morbidity secondary to bacterial translocation.

The safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a flexible three-dimensional endoscope for early gastric cancer and superficial esophageal cancer: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is performed as one of standard treatments for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and superficial esophageal squamous cancer (SESCC). A prototype of a flexible endoscope with a 3-D system has been recently developed. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of ESD using a 3-D flexible endoscope (3-D ESD) for EGC and SESCC. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent planned 3-D ESD. The clinical outcomes, including the incidence of adverse events and treatment results, were analyzed. Visibility and manipulation during 3-D ESD were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We also evaluated the effect of the 3-D system on the endoscopist using VAS and the critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF). RESULTS: We analyzed 47 EGC and 20 SESCC cases. There are no bleeding cases that required transfusion and perforation during 3-D ESD in both EGC and SESCC patients. However, the incidence of delayed bleeding and delayed perforation was 1.5% (one case) each. The mean VAS scores for recognizing the submucosal layer during the submucosal dissection, visual perception of blood vessel, and depth perception were 72.7 ± 22.2, 74.7 ± 21.8, and 78.2 ± 19.9, respectively. In contrast, the mean VAS score for manipulation was 25.4 ± 19.7. Among endoscopists, there was no significant difference in the VAS of eyestrain and headache before and after ESD, and there was no significant difference in the CFFF. CONCLUSION: The safety and feasibility of 3-D ESD for EGC and SESCC are acceptable in both patients and endoscopists.

Diagnostic ability of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification for colorectal lesions by magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging versus narrow-band imaging.

Background and study aims The Japan Narrow-band imaging (NBI) Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed for evaluating colorectal lesions. However, it remains unknown whether the JNET classification can be applied to magnifying endoscopy with image-enhanced endoscopies other than NBI. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of JNET classification by magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging (ME-BLI) and with ME-NBI. Patients and methods We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients diagnosed per the JNET classification by ME-BLI (BLI group) or ME-NBI (NBI group) between March 2014 and June 2017. We compared the diagnostic value of JNET classification between the groups with one-to-one propensity score matching. Results Four hundred and seventy-one propensity score-matched pairs of lesions were analyzed. In the BLI and NBI groups, the overall diagnostic accuracies were 92.1 % and 91.7 %, respectively, and those for differentiating between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps were 96.6 % and 96.8 %, respectively. The positive predictive value by each JNET classification in BLI vs. NBI group was 90.6 % vs. 96.2 % in Type 1, 94.3 % vs. 94.6 % in Type 2A, 57.7 % vs. 42.3 % in Type 2B, and 100 % vs. 91.7 % in Type 3. The negative predictive value was 97.0 % vs. 96.9 % in Type 1, 88.1 % vs. 82.8 % in Type 2A, 98.0 % vs. 98.2 % in Type 2B, and 98.5 % vs. 98.7 % in Type 3. No statistical difference in the diagnostic results was found between the groups. Conclusions The diagnostic ability of the JNET classification by ME-BLI and ME-NBI was comparable, with the former also applicable for diagnosis of colorectal lesions.

Objective evaluation of the visibility of colorectal lesions using eye tracking.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To assess the visibility of colorectal lesions using blue laser imaging (BLI)-bright and linked-color imaging (LCI) with an eye-tracking system. METHODS: Eleven endoscopists evaluated 90 images of 30 colorectal lesions. The lesions were randomly selected. Three images of each lesion comprised white light imaging (WLI), BLI-bright, and LCI in the same position. Participants gazed at the images, and their eye movements were tracked by the eye tracker. We analyzed whether the participants could detect the lesion and how long they took to detect the lesion. We assessed the miss rate and detection time among the imaging modalities. RESULTS: One endoscopist was excluded, and 10 endoscopists were assessed. Overall, 12.6% of lesions were missed with WLI, 6.0% with BLI-bright, and 4.3% with LCI; the miss rate of BLI-bright and LCI was significantly lower than that of WLI (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between the former modalities (P = 0.54). Mean (± SD) detection times were 1.58 ± 1.60 s for WLI, 1.01 ± 1.21 s for BLI-bright, and 1.10 ± 1.16 s for LCI. Detection time for BLI-bright and LCI was significantly shorter than that for WLI (P < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the former modalities (P = 0.34). Regarding the miss rate and detection time between the expert and the non-experts, there was a significant difference with WLI but not with BLI-bright and LCI. CONCLUSION: Blue laser imaging-bright and LCI improved the detection of colorectal lesions compared with WLI using an eye-tracking system.

Preeclampsia before 20 weeks of gestation: a case report and review of the literature.

The occurrence of preeclampsia before 20 weeks of gestation is rare and usually associated with trophoblastic diseases or antiphospholipid syndrome. Here, we report a case of preeclampsia before 20 weeks of gestation in the absence of the aforementioned disorders. A healthy 30-year-old nulliparous woman presented with new onset of hypertension and proteinuria at 18 weeks of gestation. Fetal ultrasound did not reveal any abnormalities. Empirical steroid treatment was initiated based on a tentative diagnosis of underlying renal disease. The clinical course of the disease was progressive despite steroid treatment and the fetus died in utero 8 days after the initiation of treatment. Following delivery, a renal biopsy was performed and provided a diagnosis of preeclampsia. All symptoms resolved postpartum. This report demonstrates that preeclampsia may occur before 20 weeks of gestation and should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of pregnant women with new onset of hypertension with proteinuria. Previous published cases are summarized briefly.