Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of bioabsorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: One million individuals in the USA die from acute myocardial infarction (MI), which currently affects 3 million people globally. The available data about the early and late outcomes of both biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) and durable polymer drug-eluting stents exhibit inconsistency. We performed a meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of BP-DES with DP-DES. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Clinical Trials.gov databases were used to find out studies comparing BP-DES to DP-DES. All the analyses used the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were incorporated in this meta-analysis that involved 28,874 patients, out of which 11,997 received the BP Stent, and the rest of 16,578 received the DP stent. Thorough analyses revealed that the risk of all-cause death was significantly higher in the BP-DES group (5.4% vs 2.7%) (RR 1.22, p 0.02) for two years or less than two-year follow-up. For studies with more than two years of follow-up, all-cause death was 9.07% (599/6603) in BP-DES and 9.47% (531/5602) in the DP-DES group but failed to achieve statistically significant levels (RR 0.97, p 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed no clinically significant (P value was > 0.05) differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), late stent thrombosis, device-oriented composite endpoint/target lesion failure (DOCE/TLF), myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel infarction (TVI) between BP-DES and DP-DES for more than two years of follow-up. Additionally, all-cause death was only outcomes which found to have a statistically significant difference for less than two years of follow-up, while remaining were statistically non-significant.

Assessing the efficacy of celecoxib after tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

OBJECTIVES: Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of celecoxib compared with a placebo for managing post-tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy pain and other adverse events. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from inception until July 2023. Dichotomous outcomes have been reported as risk ratios (RR) while continuous outcomes were reported using mean differences (MD). A funnel plot was drawn to investigate publication bias. RESULTS: From 1394 records identified, 6 randomised double-blind trials comprising 591 participants undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. A high dose (400 mg) of celecoxib was effective in decreasing the pain score for 'worst pain' after the procedure (MD: -10.98, [95% CI: -11.53, -10.42], p < .01, I2 = 0%) while a low dose (200 mg) was not significantly effective (p = 0.31). For managing other outcomes such as vomiting (RR: 1.37 [95% CI: 0.69, 2.68], p = 0.37, I2 = 67%), diarrhoea (RR: 1.41, [95% CI: 0.75, 2.64], p = .29, I2 = 42%), dizziness/drowsiness (RR: 0.90, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.15], p = .48, I2 = 0%), functional recovery time (p = .74), and headache (p = .91), there was no significant difference between the group on celecoxib and the placebo group regardless of dosage. Finally, there was no significant difference (RR: 1.02, [95% CI: 0.91, 1.15], p = .69, I2 = 0%) in the effect of the intervention on minimum bleeding, moderate bleeding, and profuse bleeding. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence pooled from high-quality trials and raises questions about the efficacy of celecoxib for tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, challenging existing perceptions.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Conventional Acupuncture and Pharmacological Approaches for Cardiac Arrhythmias: An Umbrella Review.

With a global incidence of approximately 3.4% and an annual mortality rate of 3.7 million, cardiac arrhythmias (CAs) are a pressing global health issue. Their increasing prevalence, especially among older people, is intensifying the challenge for health care systems worldwide. This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of acupuncture and pharmacological treatments for CAs, addressing critical gaps in understanding optimal therapeutic approaches. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews was performed to identify data compiled through September 2023 for this umbrella review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the foundation for meta-analyses and peer-reviewed systematic reviews were the primary focus of the literature search. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence, whereas AMSTAR 2 and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to evaluate the quality of the included reviews. Following a comprehensive review, three systematic analyses of 27 RCTs were integrated. Acupuncture led to a slightly greater reduction in the recurrence rate of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) compared to standard pharmaceutical therapy (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.27; I2 = 56%; P = .55), although the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, acupuncture significantly outperformed pharmacological treatment in the context of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) (RR, 1.16; 95 CI, 1.08-1.25; I2 = 0%; P < .0001). The reduction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter was increased with acupuncture, albeit without statistical significance (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.88-1.42; I2 = 0%; P = .36). Acupuncture also led to a greater reduction in heart rate (HR) compared to pharmaceutical treatment despite notable heterogeneity and a lack of statistical significance (mean difference, -1.55; 95% CI, -41.37 to 38.28; I2 = 99%; P = .94). Adverse events were effectively managed, affirming the favorable safety profile of acupuncture. Our study suggests that acupuncture leads to a greater reduction in the recurrence rates of VPBs, AF, and atrial flutter but not significantly so in paroxysmal SVT or post-treatment HR. While promising for specific arrhythmias, the varying effectiveness of acupuncture underscores the need for further research and clinical assessment to determine its precise role and suitability in managing particular cardiac conditions.

Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been the gold standard for anesthesia induction and maintenance due to its rapid onset and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. However, the search for alternative agents with improved safety and efficacy has led to the emergence of ciprofol (HSK3486), a structural analog of propofol. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared to propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgical procedures. METHODS: This study included only double-arm RCTs in which participants were aged eighteen or older undergoing surgery. For the statistical analysis of the extracted data, we employed RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: Ciprofol demonstrated a promising trend of higher anesthesiologists' satisfaction during the induction phase (MD 0.14, 95%, CI - 0.28 to 0.56, p = 0.51), whereas Propofol was favored during maintenance. Propofol also exhibited advantages with a shorter time to successful anesthesia induction (MD 0.08 min, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, p = 0.04), and quicker attainment of full alertness (MD 0.11 min, 95% CI - 1.29 to 1.52, p = 0.87), suggesting its efficiency in clinical practice. Importantly, there were no significant disparities in the success rate of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Both ciprofol and propofol demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgery. While propofol provides a faster onset of induction, ciprofol exhibits advantages in terms of pain management. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting anesthetic agents, and tailoring choices to individual patient needs and clinical scenarios.

Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on the 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially developed for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment, have shown potential benefits beyond glycemic control, including a positive impact on the blood pressure (BP). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate their effects on patients with type 2 DM and hypertension. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for relevant randomized controlled trials published until May 31, 2023. Ten randomized controlled trials involving participants with confirmed type 2 DM were selected. The intervention group received SGLT2i, whereas the control group received a placebo or standard care. The primary outcomes were the 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). RESULTS: The results showed a significant reduction in the 24-hour ambulatory SBP (weighted mean difference, -5.08 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -7.02 to -3.14; P <.00001) and DBP (weighted mean difference, -2.73 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -4.25 to -1.20; P =.0005) with the use of SGLT2i compared with that using the placebo. However, a high-heterogeneity level was observed in both analyses (SBP, I2 = 83%; DBP, I2 = 91%). Sensitivity analysis excluding specific studies reduced heterogeneity while maintaining statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in the BP. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this meta-analysis proves that SGLT2i significantly reduce the 24-hour ambulatory BP. SGLT2i may be considered an effective treatment option for lowering the BP in addition to standard care in patients with hypertension and type 2 DM.

Retraction: Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Bacterial Strains Isolated From Wound of Patients With Diabetes.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47681.].

Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for accurate diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases.

Electrocardiography (ECG), improved by artificial intelligence (AI), has become a potential technique for the precise diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. The conventional ECG is a frequently used, inexpensive, and easily accessible test that offers important information about the physiological and anatomical state of the heart. However, the ECG can be interpreted differently by humans depending on the interpreter's level of training and experience, which could make diagnosis more difficult. Using AI, especially deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to look at single, continuous, and intermittent ECG leads that has led to fully automated AI models that can interpret the ECG like a human, possibly more accurately and consistently. These AI algorithms are effective non-invasive biomarkers for cardiovascular illnesses because they can identify subtle patterns and signals in the ECG that may not be readily apparent to human interpreters. The use of AI in ECG analysis has several benefits, including the quick and precise detection of problems like arrhythmias, silent cardiac illnesses, and left ventricular failure. It has the potential to help doctors with interpretation, diagnosis, risk assessment, and illness management. Aside from that, AI-enhanced ECGs have been demonstrated to boost the identification of heart failure and other cardiovascular disorders, particularly in emergency department settings, allowing for quicker and more precise treatment options. The use of AI in cardiology, however, has several limitations and obstacles, despite its potential. The effective implementation of AI-powered ECG analysis is limited by issues such as systematic bias. Biases based on age, gender, and race result from unbalanced datasets. A model's performance is impacted when diverse demographics are inadequately represented. Potentially disregarded age-related ECG variations may result from skewed age data in training sets. ECG patterns are affected by physiological differences between the sexes; a dataset that is inclined toward one sex may compromise the accuracy of the others. Genetic variations influence ECG readings, so racial diversity in datasets is significant. Furthermore, issues such as inadequate generalization, regulatory barriers, and interpretability concerns contribute to deployment difficulties. The lack of robustness in models when applied to disparate populations frequently hinders their practical applicability. The exhaustive validation required by regulatory requirements causes a delay in deployment. Difficult models that are not interpretable erode the confidence of clinicians. Diverse dataset curation, bias mitigation strategies, continuous validation across populations, and collaborative efforts for regulatory approval are essential for the successful deployment of AI ECG in clinical settings and must be undertaken to address these issues. To guarantee a safe and successful deployment in clinical practice, the use of AI in cardiology must be done with a thorough understanding of the algorithms and their limits. In summary, AI-enhanced electrocardiography has enormous potential to improve the management of cardiovascular illness by delivering precise and timely diagnostic insights, aiding clinicians, and enhancing patient outcomes. Further study and development are required to fully realize AI's promise for improving cardiology practices and patient care as technology continues to advance.

Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Bridging the Gap Between Neurology and Psychiatry.

Given the ongoing difficulties faced by clinicians and researchers in dealing with neuropsychiatric illnesses, it is becoming more and more evident that there is a need to go beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. This research consolidates existing material, examining changes in history, the fundamental neurobiological aspects, and the shared clinical manifestations between neurology and psychiatry. This inquiry examines the historical development of neuropsychiatry, focusing on the relationship between early understandings of mental illness and the later division of neurology and psychiatry. The focus is on recent advancements in comprehending the common neurobiological pathways and genetic factors that highlight the merging of these fields. The research highlights the complexities of clinical presentations in neuropsychiatric illnesses by analyzing the overlapping cognitive, affective, and behavioral symptoms. The text critiques the diagnostic issues in traditional frameworks, emphasizing the limitations in differentiating between neurological and psychiatric origins. This has ramifications for achieving correct diagnosis and arranging appropriate treatment. The paper explores developing multidisciplinary care approaches, highlighting successful collaborations between neurologists and psychiatrists. This study examines the difficulties in carrying out a plan and the process of identifying obstacles to combining different elements. It also highlights the urgent need for improved instruction and learning for smooth cooperation. The paper examines the therapeutic implications by investigating pharmacological therapies focusing on shared pathways. It also discusses the difficulties involved in managing neurological and psychiatric diseases that occur together. The study also explores non-pharmacological therapies, such as psychotherapy and rehabilitation methods, as part of a comprehensive treatment approach. Anticipating the future, the report identifies areas where the study could be improved and forecasts the influence of technological improvements on the subject. Suggestions are put out to encourage additional exploration, cooperation, and originality to narrow the divide between neurology and psychiatry, ultimately augmenting our comprehension and treatment of neuropsychiatric illnesses. This real-time synthesis adds to the ongoing discussion, providing valuable insights that align with the ever-changing field of contemporary neuropsychiatric research and therapy.

Thyroid and Its Ripple Effect: Impact on Cardiac Structure, Function, and Outcomes.

Thyroid dysfunction is a widespread and complex issue in the field of endocrine disorders. It has a significant impact on multiple physiological systems, particularly on the heart. This review explores the complex interaction between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics, examining the detailed network of molecular, cellular, and systemic changes that underlie the close connection between these two physiological areas. Thyroid dysfunction, which includes both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, is a common endocrine condition that affects millions of people worldwide. The thyroid hormones thyroxine and triiodothyronine regulate various metabolic activities essential for maintaining cellular balance. Disruptions in thyroid function result in widespread consequences, affecting the cardiovascular system. Thyroid hormones directly impact cardiac muscle cells, controlling their ability to contract, their electrical properties, and their reaction to hypertrophy. Thyroid dysfunction goes beyond the level of individual cells and involves complex interactions among vascular dynamics, neurohormonal control, and endothelial function. These factors all contribute to the development of cardiovascular illness. The impact of thyroid dysfunction on cardiac structure, function, and outcomes is not limited to a one-way pattern. Instead, it involves a dynamic two-way interaction. The manifestations of this condition can vary from minor changes in the electrical activity of the heart to more obvious structural abnormalities, such as an increase in the size of the heart muscle and a decrease in its ability to relax during the filling phase. Furthermore, the correlation between thyroid dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart failure and arrhythmias, highlights the clinical importance of this connection. This review provides a complete overview of the relationship between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics by analyzing a wide range of research from clinical, molecular, and epidemiological perspectives. This study seeks to enhance our comprehension of the comprehensive effects of thyroid dysfunction on the anatomy and function of the heart by explaining the complex molecular mechanisms and systemic consequences. The goal is to establish a basis for informed clinical treatment and future research efforts.

Safety and efficacy revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of glue versus tack mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Background: This analysis addresses the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of glue mesh fixation (GMF) compared with tack mesh fixation (TMF) in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Our meta-analysis incorporates recently conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to enhance the reference for assessing the efficacy and safety of GMF. Methods: PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were extensively reviewed for articles in the English language performed from inception to May 2023 using the keywords "Glue mesh repair," "Tack mesh repair," "Inguinal Hernia," "Herniorrhaphy," "Laparoscopic," "Mesh Fixation," and "Randomized controlled trials." Results: In this meta-analysis, we incorporated a total of 20 randomized controlled trials, evaluating each article individually using quality ratings. Compared with TMF, GMF demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of chronic pain [RR: 0.40, (0.23, 0.68)] and pain scores on postoperative day 1 [MD: -1.07, (-1.90, -0.25)]. We also used funnel plots and Egger's regression to test for publication bias. Conclusion: In summary, this meta-analysis establishes the significance of GMF in reducing chronic pain and postoperative day 1 pain compared with TMF. However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the GMF and TMF groups concerning hematoma, seroma, operation time, recurrence rate, and total complications. Nonetheless, given the small number of cases in this study, the findings must be validated in the future by multicenter, large-sample, high-quality RCTs.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae versus serratus anterior plane block in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) are regional anesthesia techniques that have shown favorable results in pain management following thoracic surgeries; however, their relative superiority is unclear. This review (PROSPERO: CRD42023443018) aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and SAPB in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries through the pooled analysis of co-primary outcomes: postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h and pain scores (static) at 24 h. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to May 2023, comparing ESPB and SAPB in thoracic surgeries. Statistical pooling was done using Review Manager 5.4.1. Bias assessment employed the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool. The strength of evidence was assessed using the guidelines from the GRADE working group. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (485 patients) were included in the study. Postoperative pain scores (static) at 24 h (mean difference (MD) = - 0.31 [- 0.57, 0.05], p = 0.02) and postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h (MD = - 19.73 [- 25.65, - 13.80], p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ESBP group. However, the MDs did not exceed the set threshold for clinical importance. No significant differences were observed in the opioid-related adverse effects and block-related complications. CONCLUSION: Our statistically significant results imply that ESPB has superior analgesic efficacy compared to SAPB; however, this difference is clinically unimportant. The safety profile of the two blocks is comparable; hence, current evidence cannot define the relative superiority of one block over the other. Our findings warrant further research with standardized methodologies and a longer duration of analgesic efficacy assessment to yield robust evidence for better clinical applications.